Have a great winter break! Please note that AoPS Online will not have classes Dec 21, 2024 through Jan 3, 2025.

2016 AMC 10/12 A Discussion

Go back to the Math Jam Archive

A discussion of problems from the AMC 10/12 A, which is administered February 2. We will cover the last 5 problems on each test, as well as requested earlier problems on the tests.

Copyright © 2024 AoPS Incorporated. This page is copyrighted material. You can view and print this page for your own use, but you cannot share the contents of this file with others.

Facilitator: Jeremy Copeland

copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:00
Welcome to the 2016 AMC 10A/12A Math Jam!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:02
I'm Jeremy Copeland, and I'll be leading our discussion tonight.
leonlzg 2016-02-03 19:03:10
Hi jeremy
copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:12
Hi.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:13
I'm the school director here at AoPS. That means when something goes wrong, I either get yelled at or have to yell at someone else. Before AoPS, I was an instructor at MIT, and before that I got my Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. Before that I was an undergrad at Reed College and going back even further, I can't really remember. I used to have hobbies, but I'm a parent now, so those days are all over.
chessdude2015 2016-02-03 19:03:21
Wow! How do you type so fast?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:22
I have two keyboards.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:25
Before we get started I would like to take a moment to explain our virtual classroom procedures to those who have not previously participated in a Math Jam or one of our online classes.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:35
The classroom is moderated, meaning that students can type into the classroom, but these comments will not go directly into the room. These comments go to the instructors, who may choose to share your comments with the room.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:45
This helps keep the class organized and on track. This also means that only well-written comments will be dropped into the classroom, so please take time writing responses that are complete and easy to read.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:03:53
There are bunches and bunches of students here. As I said, only a fraction of the well-written comments will be passed to the entire group. Please do not take it personally if your comments do not get posted, and please do not complain about it. I expect this Math Jam to be much larger than our typical class, so please be patient with me---there are quite a few of you here tonight!!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:04:09
Also, we won't be going through the math quite as thoroughly as we do in our classes -- I can't teach all the prerequisite material for every problem as we go. Another difference between tonight and our regular online classes is that it is very unlikely that we'll be able to answer every single question you ask. We usually do in our classes, but we have a large number of students tonight! So, please go ahead and ask questions, but also please understand if we aren't able to answer them all!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:04:35
We plan to have 3 assistants tonight: Nicholas Yang (nackster), Ian Osborn (Frostwriter111), and Nick Bravo (nbravo).
copeland 2016-02-03 19:04:46
Right now Ian is the only one who did not get caught in traffic:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:04:48
Ian joined AoPS in 2015. He graduated from MIT in 2014 with a BS in Mathematics and Chemical Engineering. In high school, he was an active member of the math team. Ian's accomplishments include high individual rankings at competitions such as HMMT and PUMaC, and qualifying for the USAMO four times. His team also finished in 4th place in the 2010 Moody's Mega Math Challenge, a mathematical modeling competition. In his free time, Ian enjoys singing, logic puzzles, and board games.
AlanMTuring 2016-02-03 19:05:00
Mr. Copeland, how can you use two keyboards at once?
Frostwriter111 2016-02-03 19:05:00
Hello everyone!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:05:02
Very quickly.
christbow 2016-02-03 19:05:15
Who's levans?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:05:16
He doesn't exist. You imagined him.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:05:29
Assistants can answer questions by whispering to you or by opening a window with you to chat 1-on-1. However, due to the incredibly large size of the session tonight, they may not be able to get to you right away (or at all). Repeating your question over and over is more likely to annoy us than to get it answered faster, so please, just ask your question once and be patient, and please understand that we may not be able to answer all the questions tonight.
chessdude2015 2016-02-03 19:05:47
Who is markchen?
BAYMAX_HAMADA 2016-02-03 19:05:47
whos mark chen?
shivao 2016-02-03 19:05:47
who's markchen
copeland 2016-02-03 19:05:48
He's another of our awesome instructors, just hanging out.
markchen 2016-02-03 19:05:57
Hi!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:06:28
We will work the last 5 problems from the AMC 10A, then the last 5 problems from the AMC 12A. Two of these problems are the same, 10A Problems 24 and 25 are 12A Problems 21 and 22. We'll only solve these problems once.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:06:40
We usually promise to chat about other problems on the test, but honestly, I tend to meander and most of us will be exhausted by the end of these 8 problems.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:06:55
Who's ready to rock?
ImpossibleSphere 2016-02-03 19:07:10
ME!
Natsu_Dragneel 2016-02-03 19:07:10
ME
Lion7 2016-02-03 19:07:10
MathConquer2014 2016-02-03 19:07:10
ME!
song2sons 2016-02-03 19:07:10
me!
claserken 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me
overninethousand 2016-02-03 19:07:10
me!
Wh2002 2016-02-03 19:07:10
me
IceFireGold1 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me
jfurf 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me!
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:07:10
me
stan23456 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me!
TroyMathGuy 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Im so exited
happyribbon 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me!
amcwu 2016-02-03 19:07:10
me
leonlzg 2016-02-03 19:07:10
I am!
MaYang 2016-02-03 19:07:10
fatcat36 2016-02-03 19:07:10
ME
beanielove2 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Meeeee
Aspen 2016-02-03 19:07:10
not me
AoPSuser056 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me!
zardum 2016-02-03 19:07:10
space_space 2016-02-03 19:07:10
not me
lcalvert99 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Yeah!!!!
Luke Skywalker 2016-02-03 19:07:10
I am!
celestialphoenix3768 2016-02-03 19:07:10
me
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me!!!
shivao 2016-02-03 19:07:10
me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
noobynoob 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Teams
jasonmath 2016-02-03 19:07:10
mes
Nirnivna 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me!
goldypeng 2016-02-03 19:07:10
Me
CobbleHead 2016-02-03 19:07:10
me
copeland 2016-02-03 19:07:18
OK, let's get started!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:07:32
Oh, and there truly are a lot of people here tonight. I really don't like saying it, but we're probably going to miss some of the things that some of you say. Please forgive me in advance. That doesn't happen in our classes.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:07:38
And on with the AMC10:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:07:43
21. Circles with centers $P, Q,$ and $R,$ having radii 1, 2, and 3, respectively, lie on the same side of line $l$ and are tangent to $l$ at $P', Q',$ and $R'$, respectively, with $Q'$ between $P'$ and $R'$. The circle with center $Q$ is externally tangent to each of the other two circles. What is the area of $\triangle PQR$?
$\phantom{10A:21}$
(A) $0 \qquad$ (B) $\sqrt{\dfrac{2}{3}} \qquad$ (C) $1 \qquad$ (D) $\sqrt{6} - \sqrt{2} \qquad$ (E) $\sqrt{\dfrac{3}{2}}$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:07:52
Step one in a problem like this?
Alanshenkerman 2016-02-03 19:08:07
diagram
stan23456 2016-02-03 19:08:07
Diagram?
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 19:08:07
Picture!
akaashp11 2016-02-03 19:08:07
Diagram
jfurf 2016-02-03 19:08:07
Picture!
fractal161 2016-02-03 19:08:07
Diagram!!!!
thkim1011 2016-02-03 19:08:07
diagram
Radical_CC 2016-02-03 19:08:07
picture!
bigboss 2016-02-03 19:08:07
draw diagram
mathfan1256 2016-02-03 19:08:07
Draw a diagram
Ultimate_draco 2016-02-03 19:08:07
draw a picture
baseballcat 2016-02-03 19:08:07
draw a diagram
copeland 2016-02-03 19:08:10
Let's draw a diagram!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:08:13
copeland 2016-02-03 19:08:16
Now I don't yet know whether $PR$ passes above or below $Q$, but we can verify this in a second. It's important to start by drawing some diagram and we can always change it up when we get more information.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:08:27
What are $PQ$ and $QR$?
swagchicken 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3 and 5
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3,5
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3 and 5
Alacarter 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3 and 5
GeorgCantor 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3 and 5
duruphi 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3 and 5
ChickenOnRage 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3 and 5 respectively
arvind2002 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3 and 5
FlakeLCR 2016-02-03 19:08:58
3,5
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:08:58
pq is 3 and qr is 5
xiaodongxi 2016-02-03 19:08:58
PQ=3, QR=5
copeland 2016-02-03 19:09:00
Since $PQ$ and $QR$ are made from radii of the circles, $PQ=1+2=3$ and $QR=2+3=5$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:09:03
Now how should we compute the area of $\triangle PQR?$
arvind2002 2016-02-03 19:09:20
herons?
Alacarter 2016-02-03 19:09:20
heron's formula
awesomethree 2016-02-03 19:09:20
herons
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:09:20
herons?
lcalvert99 2016-02-03 19:09:20
Heron?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:09:23
Crazy.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:09:25
Anything simpler?
tipro 2016-02-03 19:09:50
subtaction
garyasho 2016-02-03 19:09:50
Subtract area of 2 trapezoids
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:09:50
subtract areas
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:09:50
add two trapezoids and subtract one
pedronr 2016-02-03 19:09:50
subtraction
akaashp11 2016-02-03 19:09:50
Subtracting areas
tipro 2016-02-03 19:09:50
find the area of the big figure and subtract triangles
copeland 2016-02-03 19:09:54
We can subtract! There are a number of figures we can easily compute the areas of that we can use to find $\triangle PQR$. Let's drop a couple of vertical and horizontal lines on the page:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:10:10
copeland 2016-02-03 19:10:12
Now what are these horizontal lengths?
spartan168 2016-02-03 19:10:33
Pythagorean Theorem!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:10:34
For sure!
Alacarter 2016-02-03 19:11:12
rad 8 and rad 24
vitriolhumor 2016-02-03 19:11:12
sqrt8 and sqrt24
MaYang 2016-02-03 19:11:12
P'Q'=2root(2), Q'R'=2root(6)
jclash 2016-02-03 19:11:12
2sqrt2 and 2sqrt6
MaYang 2016-02-03 19:11:12
P'Q'=2root(2), Q'R'=2root(6)
bigboss 2016-02-03 19:11:12
2\sqrt2 and 2\sqrt6
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:11:12
$2\sqrt{6}$ for qr and $2\sqrt2$ for pq
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:11:12
copeland 2016-02-03 19:11:25
The vertical lengths are 1, so the Pythagorean Theorem gives us horizontal lengths of $\sqrt{9-1}=\sqrt8=2\sqrt2$ and $\sqrt{25-1}=\sqrt24=2\sqrt6$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:11:32
copeland 2016-02-03 19:11:37
Incidentally, what's the slope of $PQ?$
pedronr 2016-02-03 19:12:18
1/(2sqrt2)
mathcool2009 2016-02-03 19:12:18
1/2\sqrt{2}
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:12:18
sqrt2/4
beanielove2 2016-02-03 19:12:18
1/2\sqrt{2}.
strategos21 2016-02-03 19:12:18
sqrt2/4
awesomethree 2016-02-03 19:12:18
sqrt(2)/4
myungsooglee 2016-02-03 19:12:18
sqrt2/4
PNPADU 2016-02-03 19:12:18
1/2root2
alexli2014 2016-02-03 19:12:18
sqrt(2)/4
ninjataco 2016-02-03 19:12:18
sqrt2 / 4
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:22
The slope of $PQ$ is $\dfrac1{2\sqrt2}$. Likewise the slope of $QR$ is $\dfrac1{2\sqrt{6}}$. Since $\dfrac1{2\sqrt2}>\dfrac1{2\sqrt{6}}$ we now know $Q$ lies above $PR$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:31
Finally we see that $\triangle PQR$ can be build by combining two triangles and a rectangle and then subtracting a triangle.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:32
We begin by adding the three regions:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:34
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:34
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:35
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:41
and then subtracting the triangle
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:44
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:54
What's the area of this region:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:12:56
Myst_Hawk 2016-02-03 19:13:19
sqrt2
leafshadow 2016-02-03 19:13:19
sqrt 2
bringerofawesomeness 2016-02-03 19:13:19
sqrt2
Natsu_Dragneel 2016-02-03 19:13:19
root2
ImpossibleSphere 2016-02-03 19:13:19
$\sqrt{2}$
Matthew2000 2016-02-03 19:13:19
sqrt2
Locust 2016-02-03 19:13:19
IceFireGold1 2016-02-03 19:13:19
\sqrt{2}
CobbleHead 2016-02-03 19:13:19
sqrt(2)
Wh2002 2016-02-03 19:13:19
root 2
copeland 2016-02-03 19:13:22
This region has area $\dfrac12\cdot2\sqrt2\cdot1=\sqrt2$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:13:22
What's the area of this region:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:13:23
amcwu 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2root6
shivao 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2sqrt(6)
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2√6
APR02 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2 rad 6
rocket13jg 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2rt6
axue 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2 sqrt6
RiverTam 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2 sqrt(6)
math1012 2016-02-03 19:13:51
$2\sqrt{6}$
PI.E_3.14 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2sqrt(6)
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2sqrt6
chessdude2015 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2 root 6
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2sqrt(6)
celestialphoenix3768 2016-02-03 19:13:51
2sqrt6
copeland 2016-02-03 19:13:55
This region has area $1\cdot2\sqrt6=2\sqrt6$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:13:56
What's the area of this region:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:13:58
jfurf 2016-02-03 19:14:22
$\sqrt{6}$
BAYMAX_HAMADA 2016-02-03 19:14:22
sqrt6
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 19:14:22
$\sqrt{6}$
space_space 2016-02-03 19:14:22
sqrt6
blueberry2 2016-02-03 19:14:22
sqrt6
BillytheChamp 2016-02-03 19:14:22
sqrt6
MathConquer2014 2016-02-03 19:14:22
sqrt6
buzhidao 2016-02-03 19:14:22
$\sqrt{6}$
claserken 2016-02-03 19:14:22
root(6)
TheRealDeal 2016-02-03 19:14:22
sqrt6
blizzard10 2016-02-03 19:14:22
$\sqrt{6}$
Peggy 2016-02-03 19:14:22
$\sqrt{6}$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:14:26
This region is half as large as the rectangle we just computed so it has area $\sqrt6$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:14:28
The total area of the green regions is $\sqrt2+2\sqrt6+\sqrt6=\sqrt2+3\sqrt6.$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:14:28
What's the area of the blue region:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:14:30
amcwu 2016-02-03 19:15:13
2root2 + 2 root 6
bigboss 2016-02-03 19:15:13
2\sqrt2 + 2\sqrt6
alexli2014 2016-02-03 19:15:13
2sqrt(2) + 2sqrt(6)
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 19:15:13
2root(6)+2root(2)
Shruige1 2016-02-03 19:15:13
2rt2 + 2rt6
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 19:15:13
2sqrt2+2sqrt6
Sophiarulz 2016-02-03 19:15:13
2sqrt2 + 2sqrt6
ethanproz 2016-02-03 19:15:13
$2\sqrt{2} + 2\sqrt{6}$
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:15:13
2√2+2√6
Anno 2016-02-03 19:15:17
2\sqrt2 + 2\sqrt6
copeland 2016-02-03 19:15:22
This region has area $\dfrac12\cdot(2\sqrt2+2\sqrt6)\cdot2=2\sqrt2+2\sqrt6$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:15:22
And what is the area of $\triangle PQR?$
dchen04 2016-02-03 19:16:13
rad(2)+2*rad(6)+rad(6)-2*rad(2)-2*rad(6)=rad(6)-rad(2)
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:16:13
$\sqrt{6}-\sqrt{2}$
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:16:13
sqrt(6)-sqrt(2)
happyribbon 2016-02-03 19:16:13
sqrt6 - sqrt2
yuvi18 2016-02-03 19:16:13
sqrt(6)- sqrt(2)
arvind2002 2016-02-03 19:16:13
root 6 -root2
garyasho 2016-02-03 19:16:13
root 6 - root 2
lasergazer 2016-02-03 19:16:13
sqrt6 - sqrt2
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:16:13
$\sqrt{6}-\sqrt{2}$
Derrick.Liang 2016-02-03 19:16:13
sqrt(6)-sqrt(2)
copeland 2016-02-03 19:16:16
Triangle $PQR$ has area
\[(\sqrt2+3\sqrt6)-(2\sqrt2+2\sqrt6)=\boxed{\sqrt6-\sqrt2}.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:16:20
The answer is $D$.
skimisgod 2016-02-03 19:17:14
Yay!
rocket13jg 2016-02-03 19:17:14
yay
Aspen 2016-02-03 19:17:14
YAY~
FarmGirl 2016-02-03 19:17:14
That is so cool! Thank you.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:17:20
Indeed. One down.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:17:36
What's next?
Nirnivna 2016-02-03 19:17:52
22
BillytheChamp 2016-02-03 19:17:52
22
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:17:52
question 22?
ImpossibleSphere 2016-02-03 19:17:52
22, right?
akaashp11 2016-02-03 19:17:52
{22}
copeland 2016-02-03 19:17:57
OK, great.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:18:01
22. For some positive integer $n$, the number $110n^3$ has 110 positive integer divisors, including 1 and the number $110n^3$. How many positive integer divisors does $81n^4$ have?
$\phantom{10A:22}$
(A) $110\qquad$ (B) $191 \qquad$ (C) $261 \qquad$ (D) $325 \qquad$ (E) $425$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:18:05
This problem is about counting divisors. We're probably going to need that formula so remind me. How many divisors does $3^87^{12}17^4$ have?
Ericaops 2016-02-03 19:18:43
9*13*5
mathcool2009 2016-02-03 19:18:43
(8+1)(12+1)(4+1)
ChickenOnRage 2016-02-03 19:18:43
9*13*5
coconut_force 2016-02-03 19:18:43
9 * 13 * 5
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:18:43
9*13*5
owm 2016-02-03 19:18:43
(8+1)(12+1)(4+1)
Alanshenkerman 2016-02-03 19:18:43
(8+1)(12+1)(4+1)
galaxy1234 2016-02-03 19:18:43
(9)(13)(5)
beanielove2 2016-02-03 19:18:43
$9\cdot 13\cdot 5.$
spartan168 2016-02-03 19:18:43
(8+1) * (12+1) * (4+1) = 585
Einsteinhead 2016-02-03 19:18:43
$(8+1)(12+1)(4+1)=595$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:18:45
In order to construct a divisor of $3^87^{12}17^4$ we need to pick some number of 3s between 0 and 8, we need to pick some number of 7s between 0 and 12 and we need to pick some number of 17s between 0 and 4.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:18:52
There are 9 ways to pick a number of threes, 13 ways to pick a number of 7s and 5 ways to pick a number of 17. The number of divisors of $3^87^{12}17^4$ is \[(8+1)(12+1)(4+1).\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:18:55
More generally, if we have a number factored into a product of prime powers, we can count its divisors by adding one to each exponent and multiplying all the results.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:19:05
(Assuming the bases are all distinct.)
copeland 2016-02-03 19:19:13
So here, when we add one to all the exponents of the prime powers in $110n^3$ and multiply those together we get 110.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:19:14
Does that tell us anything immediately about $n?$
eisirrational 2016-02-03 19:20:20
so n can only have 2,5,11 as prime factors
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:20:20
it only has prime factors 2,5,11
BitterGummy 2016-02-03 19:20:26
n has factors of 2, 5 or 11
Ericaops 2016-02-03 19:20:26
has prime powers of 2,5, and/or 11
copeland 2016-02-03 19:20:29
The number 110 is the product of three primes, $110=2\cdot5\cdot11.$ Therefore there are at most 3 nonzero prime powers in the factorization of $110n^3.$ Since we already know 2, 3, and 5 divide $110n^3$ there can be no other primes that divide $n$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:21:12
So we can write $n=2^a5^b11^c$ for nonnegative $a$, $b$, and $c$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:21:14
And what equation does $a$, $b$, and $c$ solve?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:22:03
Tough, question. Let's back it out a little. How do we factor $110n^3,$ first?
Natsu_Dragneel 2016-02-03 19:22:36
2*5*11*n^3
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 19:22:36
$2*5*11*n^3$
claserken 2016-02-03 19:22:36
2*5*11*n*n*n
copeland 2016-02-03 19:22:47
And we know the factorization of $n$. . .
ninjataco 2016-02-03 19:23:24
$2^{3a+1}5^{3b+1}11^{3c+1}$
coconut_force 2016-02-03 19:23:24
2 * 5 * 11 * (2^a * 5^b * 11^c) ^ 3
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:23:24
2^(3a+1)*5^(3b+1)*11^(3c+1)
copeland 2016-02-03 19:23:43
Great.
\[110n^3=(2\cdot5\cdot11)(2^a5^b11^c)^3=2^{3a+1}5^{3b+1}11^{3c+1}.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:23:49
What does our divisor formula say?
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:24:32
(3a+2)(3b+2)(3c+2)=110
ninjataco 2016-02-03 19:24:32
(3a + 2)(3b + 2)(3c + 2) = 110
Lion7 2016-02-03 19:24:32
(3a+2)(3b+2)(3c+2)=110
blizzard10 2016-02-03 19:24:32
So $(3a+2)(3b+2)(3c+2) = 110$
jfurf 2016-02-03 19:24:32
$(3a+2)\cdot{(3b+2)}\cdot{(3c+2)}=110$.
brisane 2016-02-03 19:24:32
(3a+2)(3b+2)(3c+2) = 110.
skimisgod 2016-02-03 19:24:32
(3a+2)(3b+2)(3c+2)=110
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:24:32
(3a+2)(3b+2)(3c+2)=110?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:24:35
Our divisor formula says\[(3a+2)(3b+2)(3c+2)=2\cdot5\cdot11.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:24:37
So what are $a$, $b$, and $c$?
fractal161 2016-02-03 19:25:36
0, 1, and 3, in some semi-random order
SHARKYBOY 2016-02-03 19:25:36
3, 1, 0 in some order
Peggy 2016-02-03 19:25:36
0, 1, 3 in some order
bigboss 2016-02-03 19:25:36
0,1,3
GeorgCantor 2016-02-03 19:25:36
0, 1, 3
leafshadow 2016-02-03 19:25:36
0, 1, 3
copeland 2016-02-03 19:25:40
We don't know what they are exactly, but in some order \[\{3a+2,3b+2,3c+2\}=\{2,5,11\}\]so \[\{a,b,c\}=\{0,1,3\}.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:25:43
Now how many positive divisors does $81n^4$ have?
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:26:54
325
ryanyz10 2016-02-03 19:26:54
5 * 5 * 13 = 325
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 19:26:54
325
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:26:54
5*5*13=325
Ericaops 2016-02-03 19:26:54
5*13*5
blueberry2 2016-02-03 19:26:54
5(5)(13)=325
SimonSun 2016-02-03 19:26:54
5(13)(5)
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:26:54
5*5*13
geogirl08 2016-02-03 19:26:54
5*13*5 = 325
mathproash2 2016-02-03 19:26:54
13*5*1*5 = D) 325
MaYang 2016-02-03 19:26:54
5(4a+1)(4b+1)(4c+1)
Alacarter 2016-02-03 19:26:57
(4+1)(4a+1)(4b+1)(4c+1)
copeland 2016-02-03 19:27:01
Well \[81n^4=(3^4)(2^a5^b11^c)^4=2^{4a}3^45^{4b}11^{4c}\] so it has \[(4a+1)(4+1)(4b+1)(4c+1)\] total divisors.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:27:08
We still don't know what $a$, $b$, and $c$ are, but they again appear symmetrically in this product so we know $4a+1,$ $4b+1,$ and $4c+1$ are equal to $4\cdot0+1=4,$ $4\cdot1+1=5,$ and $4\cdot3+1=13$ in some order.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:27:10
The total number of divisors is \[5\cdot1\cdot5\cdot13=\boxed{325}.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:27:12
The answer is $D$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:27:29
Great. Two down. Everybody warmed up now?
overninethousand 2016-02-03 19:27:50
yes
Nirnivna 2016-02-03 19:27:50
YES!!!
SmartYuRuo 2016-02-03 19:27:50
YEA
goldypeng 2016-02-03 19:27:50
yes
dchen04 2016-02-03 19:27:50
yes
mathmaniatoo 2016-02-03 19:27:50
yee
copeland 2016-02-03 19:27:55
OK, on to. . . .
copeland 2016-02-03 19:27:58
23. A binary operation $\diamondsuit$ has the properties that $a\diamondsuit (b \diamondsuit c) = (a \diamondsuit b) \cdot c$ and that $a \diamondsuit a = 1$ for all nonzero real numbers $a,b,$ and $c$. (Here the dot $\cdot$ represents the usual multiplication operation.) The solution to the equation $2016 \diamondsuit(6\diamondsuit x) = 100$ can be written as $\frac pq$, where $p$ and $q$ are relatively prime positive integers. What is $p+q$?
$\phantom{10A:23}$
(A) $109 \qquad$ (B) $201 \qquad$ (C) $301 \qquad$ (D) $3049 \qquad$ (E) $33,601$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:28:04
That's $\$$\diamondsuit$\$$ in TeX. Let's agree that you can use ":" to represent $\diamondsuit$, so the first identity is
a:(b:c)=(a:b)c
I'll keep using $\diamondsuit$ since it will be clearer.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:28:07
OK, do you see any binary operations that satisfy both of these properties?
ChickenOnRage 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division -_-
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:28:41
Diamond is /?
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
Zyanrhangca 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
spin8 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
beanielove2 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
ChickenOnRage 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:28:41
DIVISION
garyasho 2016-02-03 19:28:41
Division!!!
math1012 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
ChickenOnRage 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division ;-;
thequantumguy 2016-02-03 19:28:41
DIVISION
awesomethree 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
weilunsun28 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
Wh2002 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
Ultimate_draco 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division xd
alexli2014 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
Quinn 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division
baseballcat 2016-02-03 19:28:41
divison
spartan168 2016-02-03 19:28:41
division!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:28:47
Division!\[a\div(b\div c)=\frac{\phantom aa\phantom a}{\frac bc}=\frac ab\cdot c=(a\div b)\cdot c\]and \[a\div a=1.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:28:48
So what's $x$?
ythomashu 2016-02-03 19:29:47
100/2016*6
Quinn 2016-02-03 19:29:47
600/2016
Anno 2016-02-03 19:29:47
600/2016
lgbam 2016-02-03 19:29:47
25/84
Anno 2016-02-03 19:29:47
600/2016 = 25/84
vitriolhumor 2016-02-03 19:29:47
100/336 or 25/84
Wh2002 2016-02-03 19:29:47
which is 25/84
mathguy623 2016-02-03 19:29:47
25/84
beanielove2 2016-02-03 19:29:51
$\dfrac{2016}{\frac{6}{x}} = 100.$ $2016x = 600.$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:29:53
This is the classic cheat: there could be a lot of different operations that satisfy these two properties. However, the problem is asked in such a way that we know that whichever binary operation we pick we're going to get the same answer. Therefore we can solve the problem assuming $\diamondsuit$ is $\div$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:30:02
If \[2016\div(6\div x)=100\]then\[2016x=600.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:30:06
Let's factor that a little. I see at least a 4 on both sides:\[504x=150.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:30:09
Oh, there's another 2,\[252x=75,\]and also a 3,\[84x=25.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:30:15
This tells us $x=\dfrac{25}{84}.$ And what is the answer?
Tenthgrade2015 2016-02-03 19:30:36
A
jfurf 2016-02-03 19:30:36
109!
dyang 2016-02-03 19:30:36
$(A)$
smart99 2016-02-03 19:30:36
a
Lion7 2016-02-03 19:30:36
A: 109!
song2sons 2016-02-03 19:30:36
109
song2sons 2016-02-03 19:30:36
A
shivao 2016-02-03 19:30:36
A
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:30:36
109
A1012 2016-02-03 19:30:36
25+84=109
shivao 2016-02-03 19:30:36
A) 109
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 19:30:36
$109\implies A$
amplreneo 2016-02-03 19:30:36
109
copeland 2016-02-03 19:30:38
Since these are coprime, the answer is $25+84=\boxed{109},$ $A.$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:30:40
There's the answer, but it's pretty unsatisfying since we had to assume that every such binary operation gives the same value. Let's think a moment about that.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:30:45
We're faced with a couple of identities satisfied by our operation:
\begin{align*}
a\diamondsuit (b\diamondsuit c)&=(a\diamondsuit b)\cdot c\\
a\diamondsuit a&=1.
\end{align*}
copeland 2016-02-03 19:30:49
What are some standard tactics when we are faced with functional identities?
ninjataco 2016-02-03 19:31:26
substitute stuff
amplreneo 2016-02-03 19:31:26
Plug in values
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:31:26
Sub in different stuff .
copeland 2016-02-03 19:31:37
Sure, like what? What are usually good choices. Speaking generally now.
MathWhizzz 2016-02-03 19:32:20
plug x in for a,b,c
reddymathcounts 2016-02-03 19:32:20
0 or 1
shivao 2016-02-03 19:32:20
-1,0,1
TigerLily14 2016-02-03 19:32:20
1 and 0 maybe
ninjataco 2016-02-03 19:32:20
substitute 1 or a
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:32:20
Like x,x,x
ChickenOnRage 2016-02-03 19:32:20
a = b or b = c
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:32:20
1 and 0
copeland 2016-02-03 19:32:22
Some common tactics are:
$\bullet$ Set some variables in the identity to 1
$\bullet$ Set some variables in the identity to 0
$\bullet$ Set some variables in the identity equal each other
$\bullet$ Set some pair of variables to add to 0 or 1
$\bullet$ Set some pair of variables to multiply to 1
copeland 2016-02-03 19:32:37
Now we're omitting zero and we're only working with multiplication/division (not addition/subtraction) here so we should ditch several of these ideas, but we still have
$\bullet$ Set some variables in the identity to 1
$\bullet$ Set some variables in the identity equal each other
$\bullet$ Set some pair of variables in the identity to multiply to 1
copeland 2016-02-03 19:32:42
Let's try setting some variables equal to each other. What should we try?
ninjataco 2016-02-03 19:33:24
set them all equal to a
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 19:33:24
$a,a,a$?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:33:29
If we set $a=b=c$ in the first identity what do we get?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:34:14
It's an identity, so if you didn't type "=" in your response, maybe go back and check.
maxplanck 2016-02-03 19:34:29
a : 1 = a
shivao 2016-02-03 19:34:29
a:1=1:a
fractal161 2016-02-03 19:34:29
a : 1 = a
math1012 2016-02-03 19:34:29
a:1=a
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:34:29
a:1 = a
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:34:29
a:1 = a
reddymathcounts 2016-02-03 19:34:29
a:1=a
brian22 2016-02-03 19:34:29
$a \Diamond 1 = a$
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:34:29
$a\diamondsuit 1 = a$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:34:33
If we set $a=b=c$ in the first identity then we get\[a\diamondsuit(a\diamondsuit a)=(a\diamondsuit a)\cdot a.\]Applying the second identity on each side gives
\[a\diamondsuit1=1\cdot a=a.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:34:34
(Formally, this says that 1 is a right identity for $\diamondsuit$.)
copeland 2016-02-03 19:35:06
Others suggested this substitution:
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:35:08
b and c
mathguy623 2016-02-03 19:35:08
b=c
alexli2014 2016-02-03 19:35:08
b and c
Mathfun01 2016-02-03 19:35:08
b=c
MaYang 2016-02-03 19:35:08
b=c
maxplanck 2016-02-03 19:35:08
b = c
copeland 2016-02-03 19:35:17
What happens if we just set $b=c$, since that will still let us use the second identity?
ninjataco 2016-02-03 19:36:15
a = (a:b) * b
math1012 2016-02-03 19:36:15
a:1= (a:c)c
reddymathcounts 2016-02-03 19:36:15
a:1=(a:b)*b
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:36:15
a:1=(a:x)*x
TigerLily14 2016-02-03 19:36:15
a:1=a=a:b * c
happyribbon 2016-02-03 19:36:15
a:1 = (a:b):b
copeland 2016-02-03 19:36:18
If we set $b=c$ then the first identity reads\[a\diamondsuit(b\diamondsuit b)=(a\diamondsuit b)\cdot b.\]The left side simplifies to $a\diamondsuit1.$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:36:20
What does that say?
garyasho 2016-02-03 19:37:14
a/b = a:b
brian22 2016-02-03 19:37:14
$\frac{a}{b} = a \Diamond b$, after dividing by $b$
maxplanck 2016-02-03 19:37:14
a : b = a/b
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:37:14
a:b = a/b
Wh2002 2016-02-03 19:37:14
a=ab/b
geogirl08 2016-02-03 19:37:14
a : b = a / b
copeland 2016-02-03 19:37:18
We just saw that $a\diamondsuit 1=a$, so we get \[a=(a\diamondsuit b)\cdot b.\]We can divide this by $b$ to get \[\frac ab=a\diamondsuit b.\]So what?
elpers21 2016-02-03 19:37:52
division
amcwu 2016-02-03 19:37:52
diamond equals division
ThorJames 2016-02-03 19:37:52
it is division
SimonSun 2016-02-03 19:37:52
it is division
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:37:52
the operation is division
snapdragon1 2016-02-03 19:37:52
diamond is division
thequantumguy 2016-02-03 19:37:52
it is division
baseballcat 2016-02-03 19:37:52
so the operation is division?
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 19:37:52
It is divison.
BobThePotato 2016-02-03 19:37:52
the operation is equivalent to division
Ericaops 2016-02-03 19:37:52
the operation is indeed division
blueberry2 2016-02-03 19:37:55
the binary operation is division
copeland 2016-02-03 19:37:57
This tells us that the only possible thing that $\diamondsuit$ can be is division! These two properties completely define division.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:38:08
You learn something every day, huh?
happyribbon 2016-02-03 19:38:23
Yes.
SimonSun 2016-02-03 19:38:23
YUP!!
goldypeng 2016-02-03 19:38:23
yes
BitterGummy 2016-02-03 19:38:23
WHOA
vijaym 2016-02-03 19:38:23
yup!
claserken 2016-02-03 19:38:43
We wouldn't do this part of the test, right?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:38:44
I sure wouldn't have unless I'd given up on (or finished) the rest.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:38:57
OK, who wants to go on to the AMC12 and who wants to stick with the AMC10?
haradica 2016-02-03 19:39:21
AMC 12 pls
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 19:39:21
AMC10!
Ishaan 2016-02-03 19:39:21
AMC 10
dhuang26 2016-02-03 19:39:21
Stick with Amc 10
aryastark 2016-02-03 19:39:21
amc10
duruphi 2016-02-03 19:39:21
AMC10!!!
yuunderstand168 2016-02-03 19:39:21
AMC12
Radical_CC 2016-02-03 19:39:21
12!
GeorgCantor 2016-02-03 19:39:21
AMC10
hliu70 2016-02-03 19:39:21
AMC 10
brisane 2016-02-03 19:39:21
Stick with AMC10.
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 19:39:21
AMC 12
copeland 2016-02-03 19:39:27
Actually everyone wins.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:39:28
Problems 24 and 25 of the AMC10 were also Problems 21 and 22 on the AMC12, so if you're here for the AMC10, there are two more problems to go, but if you're here for the 12 then we're about to begin!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:40:03
24.A quadrilateral is inscribed in a circle of radius $200\sqrt{2}$. Three of the sides of this quadrilateral have length 200. What is the length of its fourth side?
$\phantom{10A:24}$
(A) $200 \qquad$ (B) $200\sqrt{2} \qquad$ (C) $200\sqrt{3} \qquad$ (D) $300\sqrt{2} \qquad$ (E) $500$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:40:06
[Also AMC12, Problem 21]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:40:22
I don't know what's going on with these giant numbers in this problem. I'm just going to divide every length in sight by 100 and start over:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:40:24
24.A quadrilateral is inscribed in a circle of radius $2\sqrt{2}$. Three of the sides of this quadrilateral have length 2. What is the length of its fourth side?
$\phantom{10A:24}$
(A) $2 \qquad$ (B) $2\sqrt{2} \qquad$ (C) $2\sqrt{3} \qquad$ (D) $3\sqrt{2} \qquad$ (E) $5$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:40:43
Does everyone agree those are the same problem?
APR02 2016-02-03 19:40:58
that's better
lithium123 2016-02-03 19:40:58
yep
Peggy 2016-02-03 19:40:58
yes
beanielove2 2016-02-03 19:40:58
Yeah
TheRealDeal 2016-02-03 19:40:58
yes
spin8 2016-02-03 19:40:58
yes
space_space 2016-02-03 19:40:58
yes
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:40:58
Yes
bigboss 2016-02-03 19:40:58
yes
yangyifei 2016-02-03 19:40:58
yes
copeland 2016-02-03 19:41:00
Good.
coconut_force 2016-02-03 19:41:17
diagram
MathConquer2014 2016-02-03 19:41:17
diagram!
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:41:17
Start with drawing a diagram
space_space 2016-02-03 19:41:17
diagram
patatoe 2016-02-03 19:41:17
it helps to visualize
copeland 2016-02-03 19:41:23
Diagrams are awesome.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:41:27
Notice that throughout I'm going to write $\sqrt8$ on my diagrams instead of $2\sqrt2$ since it will make the diagrams easier to read. These are the same number.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:41:31
So we're given some quadrilateral in a circle. What kind of quadrilateral is it?
akaashp11 2016-02-03 19:41:47
$Cyclical Quadrilaterals$
Luke Skywalker 2016-02-03 19:41:47
cyclic!
SHARKYBOY 2016-02-03 19:41:47
cyclic
axue 2016-02-03 19:41:47
cyclic
Mathfun01 2016-02-03 19:41:47
cyclic
leeandrew1029gmail.com 2016-02-03 19:41:47
cyclic
copeland 2016-02-03 19:41:53
Yup. What else?
ryanyz10 2016-02-03 19:42:22
isosceles trapezoid
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:42:22
isosceles trapezoid
AlcumusGuy 2016-02-03 19:42:22
isosceles trapezoid
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:42:22
isosceles trapezoid
goldypeng 2016-02-03 19:42:22
isosceles
hliu70 2016-02-03 19:42:22
isoceles trapezoid
math1012 2016-02-03 19:42:22
isosceles trapezoid
FTW 2016-02-03 19:42:22
isosceles trapezoid
brian22 2016-02-03 19:42:22
Isosceles trapezoid!
mathlete478 2016-02-03 19:42:24
Isosceles trapezoid
copeland 2016-02-03 19:42:26
It must be an isosceles trapezoid. Any cyclic quadrilateral with two opposite edges of the same length is an isosceles trapezoid.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:42:29
I don't know quite how to draw it yet. It's either
copeland 2016-02-03 19:42:30
copeland 2016-02-03 19:42:30
or
copeland 2016-02-03 19:42:32
copeland 2016-02-03 19:42:35
What distance can we throw on there to help us figure it out?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:43:22
(All I want now is to know which picture we have. . .)
copeland 2016-02-03 19:43:52
What will help us determine which is which?
spartan168 2016-02-03 19:44:09
root 7 height of each isosceles triangle
Locust 2016-02-03 19:44:09
Heights?
ThorJames 2016-02-03 19:44:10
perpendicular to the base?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:44:14
We have three of these $2-2-2\sqrt2$ triangles lying around. By the Pythagorean Theorem, these have altitude $\sqrt{8-1}=\sqrt7$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:44:14
Can this next picture be right?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:44:15
copeland 2016-02-03 19:44:30
And why or why not?
mathwhiz16 2016-02-03 19:45:24
No! $2<\sqrt{7}$
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:45:24
No, since the hypo.>then leg.
exhonourated 2016-02-03 19:45:24
sqrt 7 >2 so no
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:45:24
Triangle Inequality?
owm 2016-02-03 19:45:24
no because \sqrt{7}>2
toper2 2016-02-03 19:45:24
it cannot since sqrt(7) > 2
bigboss 2016-02-03 19:45:24
because the sides of the triangle can for a right triangle with the altitude. However, \sqrt7>2
A1012 2016-02-03 19:45:24
No, because root 7 is greater than 2
jfurf 2016-02-03 19:45:24
No. $\sqrt{7}$ is greater than $2$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:45:27
No, that's a bit absurd. Notice that $\sqrt7>2$. However, the altitude of a trapezoid is always less than or equal to the lengths of a leg. Therefore the configuration is actually:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:45:31
copeland 2016-02-03 19:45:32
I've thrown away the circle. We can resurrect if later if we need to.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:45:50
Now what do you see in this diagram? (I've labeled points for you.)
copeland 2016-02-03 19:45:51
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:46:31
Similar triagles
Einsteinhead 2016-02-03 19:46:31
similar triangles!
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 19:46:31
similar triangles
akaashp11 2016-02-03 19:46:31
Similar Triangles!!
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:46:31
Similar triangles
blizzard10 2016-02-03 19:46:31
Similar/congruent triangles
alexli2014 2016-02-03 19:46:31
similar triangles
blueberry2 2016-02-03 19:46:31
similar triangles
lychnis3 2016-02-03 19:46:31
similar triangles
strategos21 2016-02-03 19:46:31
similar triangles
copeland 2016-02-03 19:46:40
Which triangles are similar?
GeorgCantor 2016-02-03 19:47:13
PQO ~ YZO
Einsteinhead 2016-02-03 19:47:13
PQO~YZO
A1012 2016-02-03 19:47:13
POQ and YOZ
MaYang 2016-02-03 19:47:13
OPQ~OYZ
reddymathcounts 2016-02-03 19:47:13
POQ and YOZ
smart99 2016-02-03 19:47:13
OPQ and OYZ
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 19:47:13
YOZ and POQ
copeland 2016-02-03 19:47:16
Great, that's a useful pair.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:47:18
Since $XW$ is parallel to $YZ$, we have similar triangles $\triangle OYZ\sim\triangle OPQ$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:47:19
Let's call the angle $\angle OYZ=\theta$ for simplicity and mark these equalities:
copeland 2016-02-03 19:47:20
copeland 2016-02-03 19:47:23
Now what do you see?
dchen04 2016-02-03 19:48:13
xyp and opq
lcalvert99 2016-02-03 19:48:13
XYP and OPX
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 19:48:13
$\triangle YXP$ is also similiar!
memc38123 2016-02-03 19:48:13
XYP is isosceles
kunsun 2016-02-03 19:48:13
ZQW ~ POQ and PXY ~ POQ
copeland 2016-02-03 19:48:16
Ooh! Ooh! $\angle XPY=\theta$ by vertical angles, so $\triangle XYP\sim\triangle OYZ!$ What are the side lengths of $\triangle XYP?$
geogirl08 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2, 2, sqrt(2)
FTW 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2,2,$\sqrt{2}$
Interest 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2,2,sqrt(2)
TheRealDeal 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2 2 sqrt2
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2,2,sqrt(2)
ryanyz10 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2, 2, sqrt(2)
math1012 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2,2,sqrt2
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2,2,sqrt{2}
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2, 2,√2
hliu70 2016-02-03 19:49:10
2-2-sqrt(2)
copeland 2016-02-03 19:49:13
Since $\dfrac{XY}{OY}=\dfrac{2}{\sqrt8}=\dfrac1{\sqrt2}$, we get that $\triangle XYP$ is $2-2-\sqrt2$ isosceles triangle. In particular $XP=2$ and $YP=\sqrt2$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:49:16
What does knowing $YP$ tell us?
memc38123 2016-02-03 19:50:02
OP
cinamon 2016-02-03 19:50:02
PO
memc38123 2016-02-03 19:50:02
length of OP
strategos21 2016-02-03 19:50:02
OP
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:50:02
its half of YO
Einsteinhead 2016-02-03 19:50:02
PO
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:50:02
P is midpoint of YO
ssy899 2016-02-03 19:50:02
we know op
patatoe 2016-02-03 19:50:02
the length of PO
Mathfun01 2016-02-03 19:50:02
you know OP
copeland 2016-02-03 19:50:05
Now we know $OP=OY-YP=2\sqrt2-\sqrt2=\sqrt2$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:50:06
What can we determine from there?
leafshadow 2016-02-03 19:50:33
PQ
mjoshi 2016-02-03 19:50:33
gives us PQ
memc38123 2016-02-03 19:50:33
QP
Interest 2016-02-03 19:50:33
PQ
Einsteinhead 2016-02-03 19:50:33
PQ
buzhidao 2016-02-03 19:50:33
PQ
blizzard10 2016-02-03 19:50:33
PQ
TigerLily14 2016-02-03 19:50:33
PQ
copeland 2016-02-03 19:50:34
Great. What is $PQ$?
eswa2000 2016-02-03 19:50:54
PQ is 1
FTW 2016-02-03 19:50:54
$PQ=1$ from sim triangles
Alacarter 2016-02-03 19:50:54
PQ = 1
mjoshi 2016-02-03 19:50:54
1
SimonSun 2016-02-03 19:50:54
1
owm 2016-02-03 19:50:54
1
thatmathgeek 2016-02-03 19:50:54
1
goldypeng 2016-02-03 19:50:54
1
Locust 2016-02-03 19:50:54
1
brian22 2016-02-03 19:50:54
$1$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:51:01
Since $\triangle OYZ\sim\triangle OPQ$ and $\dfrac{OY}{OP}=\dfrac{2\sqrt2}{\sqrt2}=2$, we know $2=\dfrac{YZ}{PQ}=\dfrac2{PQ}$, so $PQ=1$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:51:02
Now what?
owm 2016-02-03 19:51:44
so XW=5
blizzard10 2016-02-03 19:51:44
Thus XW is 5
Mathfun01 2016-02-03 19:51:44
1 + 2 + 2
amcwu 2016-02-03 19:51:44
2+2+1=5
Arginine 2016-02-03 19:51:44
add them up
blueberry2 2016-02-03 19:51:44
add them together
spartan168 2016-02-03 19:51:44
XP + PQ + QW = 2 + 1 + 2 = 5
thatmathgeek 2016-02-03 19:51:44
add XW up to get 5
Locust 2016-02-03 19:51:44
We know the total length is 2+1+2=5
buzhidao 2016-02-03 19:51:44
Add together, get XW
FTW 2016-02-03 19:51:44
just add the lengths
goldypeng 2016-02-03 19:51:44
xw is 5
claserken 2016-02-03 19:51:44
the answer is 5
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 19:51:44
$XW=5$
TigerLily14 2016-02-03 19:51:44
add up the parts of XW
happyribbon 2016-02-03 19:51:44
XW is 5.
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:51:44
XW is 5, so the answer is (E)
memc38123 2016-02-03 19:51:44
XP + PQ + QW = 5
copeland 2016-02-03 19:51:48
Now we're done! $XW=XP+PQ+QW=2+1+2=\boxed{5}.$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:51:51
The answer to the original problem is $\boxed{500},$ $E.$
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 19:52:05
Wow that was super neat!
copeland 2016-02-03 19:52:08
Thanks.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:52:15
There are a lot of really fancy solutions, too.
MathWhizzz 2016-02-03 19:52:23
why do you think they made the numbers so big?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:52:26
I have no idea.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:52:49
My best guess is that it lets them use different numbers than appeared in 21, but that's kinda weird.
stevenrgao 2016-02-03 19:53:13
I think they did it to confuse you
copeland 2016-02-03 19:53:15
Were you confused?
thomas0115 2016-02-03 19:53:31
no
lychnis3 2016-02-03 19:53:31
yes
awesomethree 2016-02-03 19:53:31
No
amplreneo 2016-02-03 19:53:31
nope just annoyed
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 19:53:31
no
ThorJames 2016-02-03 19:53:31
yes
mathwhiz16 2016-02-03 19:53:31
Not at all
chewbacca2 2016-02-03 19:53:31
a littel
Shruige1 2016-02-03 19:53:31
not really
Sophiarulz 2016-02-03 19:53:31
very
copeland 2016-02-03 19:53:42
Alright, ready to move on?
jfurf 2016-02-03 19:54:05
YEP!!
fatcat36 2016-02-03 19:54:05
yes
xiaodongxi 2016-02-03 19:54:05
yes
spin8 2016-02-03 19:54:05
yes
leeandrew1029gmail.com 2016-02-03 19:54:05
yes
pcptc 2016-02-03 19:54:05
yeah!
leeandrew1029gmail.com 2016-02-03 19:54:05
lets go
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 19:54:05
Yes!!!
lasergazer 2016-02-03 19:54:05
yes
copeland 2016-02-03 19:54:07
25. How many ordered triples $(x,y,z)$ of positive integers satisfy $\operatorname{lcm}(x,y) = 72$, $\operatorname{lcm}(x,z) = 600$, and $\operatorname{lcm}(y,z) = 900$?
$\phantom{10A:25}$
(A) $15 \qquad$ (B) $16 \qquad$ (C) $24 \qquad$ (D) $27 \qquad$ (E) $64$
copeland 2016-02-03 19:54:09
[Also AMC12, Problem 22]
copeland 2016-02-03 19:54:16
We have three numbers and we have information about pairs of numbers. This implies a nice organizational structure for this problem. Does anyone see it?
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:54:48
We set up a table.
memc38123 2016-02-03 19:54:48
A chart!
idomath12345 2016-02-03 19:54:48
Table for powers of 2,3,5 with respect to x,y,z
brian22 2016-02-03 19:54:51
A graph?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:54:56
I imagine a lot of people used tables and everything worked out fine, but I found it a lot easier to see what is going on by creating a graph with vertices $x$, $y$, and $z$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:55:00
copeland 2016-02-03 19:55:04
Throwing our data on here gives us
copeland 2016-02-03 19:55:04
copeland 2016-02-03 19:55:17
What does $\text{lcm}(y,z)=900$ tell us about $y$ and $z$?
jrexmo 2016-02-03 19:56:04
they are both factors of 900
goodbear 2016-02-03 19:56:04
divide 900
akaashp11 2016-02-03 19:56:04
Divisors of 900
ninjataco 2016-02-03 19:56:29
prime factorization is 2^a 3^b 5^c
SimonSun 2016-02-03 19:56:29
The highest in both must be $3^3*2^2*5^2$
spartan168 2016-02-03 19:56:29
One of y and z has 2^2, one of them has 3^2 and one of them has 5^2
Locust 2016-02-03 19:56:29
the maximum prime powers are 3^2, 2^2, and 5^2
brisane 2016-02-03 19:56:29
At least one is divisible by 9, at least one is divisible by 4, and at least one is divisible by 25.
Mathaddict11 2016-02-03 19:56:29
The max exponents for each of y and z is 3^2, 2^2, and 5^2
ryanyz10 2016-02-03 19:56:29
at most 2 factors of 2, 3, and 5
copeland 2016-02-03 19:56:32
Since $900=2^23^25^2,$ it tells us
$\bullet$ Either $y$ or $z$ has a largest power of 2 equal to 2
$\bullet$ Either $y$ or $z$ has a largest power of 3 equal to 2
$\bullet$ Either $y$ or $z$ has a largest power of 5 equal to 2
$\bullet$ $y$ and $z$ are not divisible by any primes other than $2$, $3$, and $5$.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:56:43
copeland 2016-02-03 19:56:51
These are a lot of different constraints that we need to satisfy all at once. Is there some easy simplification that we can make?
ThorJames 2016-02-03 19:57:28
use cases
copeland 2016-02-03 19:57:43
Casework is viable. Anybody have a different approach?
beanielove2 2016-02-03 19:58:29
Just pick the powers for one number
copeland 2016-02-03 19:58:33
Huh. What's that mean?
Math_Magicians 2016-02-03 19:58:56
constructive counting
copeland 2016-02-03 19:59:04
Cool. How can we "construct"?
leeandrew1029gmail.com 2016-02-03 19:59:28
do one prime at at time
akaashp11 2016-02-03 19:59:28
Limit to the 2s first
alexli2014 2016-02-03 19:59:28
chose where 5 goes to start
copeland 2016-02-03 19:59:34
The powers of 2 in each of the numbers don't actually care about the powers of 3 and 5. We can figure out the ways to distribute 2s, 3s, and 5s separately and then multiply.
copeland 2016-02-03 19:59:39
How do we start with filling out this triangle?
copeland 2016-02-03 19:59:40
idomath12345 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x NEEDS the 8.
Math1331Math 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x must be 2^3
elpers21 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x must have 2^3
eswa2000 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x must have 2^3
bigboss 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x is 2^3
baseballcat 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x has 2^3
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 20:00:08
$x$ must have a factor of $2^3$
vijaym 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x = 2^3
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x is $2^3$
cinamon 2016-02-03 20:00:08
top is 2^3
Mathfun01 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x = 2^3
geogirl08 2016-02-03 20:00:08
x corner 2^3
copeland 2016-02-03 20:00:11
$y$ and $z$ both have at most 2 factors of 2. In order to satisfy the left and right edges, $x$ must have a factor of $2^3$:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:00:14
copeland 2016-02-03 20:00:18
How many possible values are there for the number of twos in the pair $(y,z)?$
hliu70 2016-02-03 20:01:07
5
memc38123 2016-02-03 20:01:07
5
memc38123 2016-02-03 20:01:07
5 pairs
SimonSun 2016-02-03 20:01:07
5
Metal_Bender19 2016-02-03 20:01:07
5
rahulkk 2016-02-03 20:01:07
5
cinamon 2016-02-03 20:01:07
5?
beanielove2 2016-02-03 20:01:07
$(2, 1), (2, 0), (0, 1), (0, 2), (2, 2)$
Mudkipswims42 2016-02-03 20:01:07
wait $5$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:01:11
Remember that one of them must have a factor of $2^2$, so there are 5 pairs:\[(0,2)\quad(1,2)\quad(2,2)\quad(2,1)\quad(2,0).\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:01:13
Incidentally, what do you notice in the original problem?
thomas0115 2016-02-03 20:01:56
only one multiple of 5
AlcumusGuy 2016-02-03 20:01:56
Only (A) is divisible by 5
Ericaops 2016-02-03 20:01:56
A is the only answer that is a multiple of 5
mjoshi 2016-02-03 20:01:56
only one is a multiply of 5
memc38123 2016-02-03 20:01:56
Only 1 answer has a multiple of 5
coconut_force 2016-02-03 20:01:56
only A is divisible by 5
leeandrew1029gmail.com 2016-02-03 20:01:56
one multiple of 5
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:01:56
A
Shruige1 2016-02-03 20:01:56
only one is a multiple of 5
ssy899 2016-02-03 20:01:56
that the only answer choice divisible by 5 is a?
ninjataco 2016-02-03 20:01:56
only 1 choice is divisible by 5
brian22 2016-02-03 20:01:56
Only one answer is divisible by $5$
dchen04 2016-02-03 20:01:56
A) 15 is divisible by 5
claserken 2016-02-03 20:01:56
There is a multiple of five.
kyleliu 2016-02-03 20:01:56
only (a) divisible by 5
copeland 2016-02-03 20:02:02
There is only one answer that is a multiple of 5. Since there are 5 ways to distribute the powers of 2, the answer must be a multiple of 5 so the answer is $\boxed{15}$, $A$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:02:03
Let's keep going just as a check. What do we learn from this diagram?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:02:07
mjoshi 2016-02-03 20:02:40
Y = 3^2
TigerLily14 2016-02-03 20:02:40
y is 2
amcwu 2016-02-03 20:02:40
y has to be 9
bringerofawesomeness 2016-02-03 20:02:40
y = 3^2
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 20:02:40
y=3^2
blueberry2 2016-02-03 20:02:40
y is 9
spartan168 2016-02-03 20:02:40
y is 3^2
ryanyz10 2016-02-03 20:02:40
y has 2 3's
annasun19 2016-02-03 20:02:40
y = 9
copeland 2016-02-03 20:02:43
We see that $y$ must have $3^2$ as its power of 3:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:02:43
copeland 2016-02-03 20:02:46
How many ways are there to distribute the threes?
cinamon 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3 possibilities
rahulkk 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3
Mathfun01 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3
snapdragon1 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3
owm 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3
ThorJames 2016-02-03 20:03:26
$3$
space_space 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3
danusv 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3 ways
leonlzg 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3
space_space 2016-02-03 20:03:26
3
copeland 2016-02-03 20:03:28
For the powers of 3 in the pair $(y,z),$ we must have one equal to 1 and the other is either 0 or 1. There are 3 ways to distribute the threes:\[(0,1)\quad(1,1)\quad(1,0).\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:03:34
And for the fives. How many ways are there to finish this triangle?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:03:39
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 20:04:13
1
Mathaddict11 2016-02-03 20:04:13
1 way
FrostBlitz 2016-02-03 20:04:13
1
Metal_Bender19 2016-02-03 20:04:13
1
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:04:13
0,0,2
geogirl08 2016-02-03 20:04:13
Only 1 ( 0, 0, 2 )
space_space 2016-02-03 20:04:13
1
Alanshenkerman 2016-02-03 20:04:13
1
stevenrgao 2016-02-03 20:04:13
1 way
akaashp11 2016-02-03 20:04:13
1 way (x,y,z) = (0,0,2)
axue 2016-02-03 20:04:13
one way: z gets 5^2
copeland 2016-02-03 20:04:15
Since $\text{lcm}(x,y)$ contains no fives, $x$ and $y$ both contain no factors of 5. That also means $z$ must have $5^2$ as a prime power factor:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:04:20
copeland 2016-02-03 20:04:23
This is unique, so there is 1 way to distribute the fives.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:04:24
And was our guess right?
snapdragon1 2016-02-03 20:04:46
yes
Peggy 2016-02-03 20:04:46
yes it was
MasterSnipes 2016-02-03 20:04:46
Yes
happyribbon 2016-02-03 20:04:46
Yes
FrostBlitz 2016-02-03 20:04:46
yes, because 3x5=15
thomas0115 2016-02-03 20:04:46
of course
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:04:46
yes
lkarhat 2016-02-03 20:04:46
yes
brisane 2016-02-03 20:04:46
Yes.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:04:56
Yes. In all, there are $5\cdot3\cdot1=\boxed{15}$ ways to construct $(x,y,z).$ The answer is $A.$
yiqun 2016-02-03 20:05:13
ANOTHER ONE PLZ
copeland 2016-02-03 20:05:17
Are you sure?
ciao_potter 2016-02-03 20:05:27
yeah mann
MasterSnipes 2016-02-03 20:05:27
Another one please!
usharaj99 2016-02-03 20:05:27
yes
copeland 2016-02-03 20:05:30
OK.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:05:32
As I said, Problems 24 and 25 on the AMC10 were also Problems 21 and 22 on the AMC12, so the next problem is. . .
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:05:51
23
Aspen 2016-02-03 20:05:51
23!
owm 2016-02-03 20:05:51
23
lasergazer 2016-02-03 20:05:51
12-23
blizzard10 2016-02-03 20:05:51
Problem 23 of the AMC 12?
reddymathcounts 2016-02-03 20:05:51
23 on AMC12!
copeland 2016-02-03 20:05:53
23. Three numbers in the interval $[0,1]$ are chosen independently and at random. What is the probability that the chosen numbers are the side lengths of a triangle with positive area?
$\phantom{12A:23}$
(A) $\dfrac{1}{6} \qquad$ (B) $\dfrac{1}{3} \qquad$ (C) $\dfrac{1}{2} \qquad$ (D) $\dfrac{2}{3} \qquad$ (E) $\dfrac{5}{6}$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:06:03
What kind of problem is this?
Locust 2016-02-03 20:06:24
3D Geometric Probability?
amplreneo 2016-02-03 20:06:24
Geometric Probability?
Math1331Math 2016-02-03 20:06:24
geometric probability
bigboss 2016-02-03 20:06:24
geometric prob
_--__--_ 2016-02-03 20:06:24
Geometric probability
strategos21 2016-02-03 20:06:24
geometry probability
alexli2014 2016-02-03 20:06:24
geometric probability
TheStrangeCharm 2016-02-03 20:06:24
geometric probability
muti66 2016-02-03 20:06:27
Geo probability
copeland 2016-02-03 20:06:29
This is a geometric probability problem. Arguably, it's one of the quintessential geometric probability problems. It is a very valuable problem to see if you haven't seen it before.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:06:33
In geometric probability, we compute probabilities as $\dfrac{\text{success}}{\text{total}},$ however the success and total values are computed as sizes (lengths, areas, volumes, etc.) of geometric regions.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:06:40
You can get more info about geometric probability from Chapter 10 of our Introduction to Counting and Probability book:
https://artofproblemsolving.com/store/item/intro-counting
copeland 2016-02-03 20:06:42
What does the set of all possible choices for $x$, $y$, and $z$ look like?
geogirl08 2016-02-03 20:07:07
Unit cube
Alanshenkerman 2016-02-03 20:07:07
a unit cube
eswa2000 2016-02-03 20:07:07
unit cube
thomas0115 2016-02-03 20:07:07
a cube with side length 1
idomath12345 2016-02-03 20:07:07
Cube.
wjq8g6 2016-02-03 20:07:07
unit cube
MathDog0809 2016-02-03 20:07:07
cube
TheStrangeCharm 2016-02-03 20:07:07
a unit cube
math1012 2016-02-03 20:07:07
a cube
ethanproz 2016-02-03 20:07:07
a cube
copeland 2016-02-03 20:07:10
I can pick any value between 0 and 1 for each of my variables. The set of all possibilities is a unit cube in space:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:07:11
copeland 2016-02-03 20:07:12
The "total" region has volume 1.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:07:13
Now when do I actually get a triangle?
A1012 2016-02-03 20:08:05
x+y>z, x+z>y, y+z>x
mjoshi 2016-02-03 20:08:05
x+y>z, x+z>y, y+z>x
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:08:05
a+b>c, b+c>a, a+c>b
A1012 2016-02-03 20:08:05
x+y>z, x+z>y, y+z>x
dchen04 2016-02-03 20:08:05
z+x>y x+y>z z+y>x
ninjataco 2016-02-03 20:08:05
x+y > z, x+z > y, y+z > x
copeland 2016-02-03 20:08:09
I get a triangle when the point $(x,y,z)$ satisfies the three triangle inequalities:
\begin{align*}
x+y> z\\
y+z> x\\
z+x> y.\\
\end{align*}
copeland 2016-02-03 20:08:13
Qualitatively, how do we compute the probability we seek?
memc38123 2016-02-03 20:08:59
Draw a shape within the cube
TheStrangeCharm 2016-02-03 20:08:59
we want to find the volume of the region(s) of all points that satisfy these three inequalities
eswa2000 2016-02-03 20:08:59
find the volume corresponding to the intersection of these inequalities
AlcumusGuy 2016-02-03 20:08:59
successful volume divided by total volume
mathguy623 2016-02-03 20:08:59
find the volume of the region satisfying these inequalities
ExuberantGPACN 2016-02-03 20:08:59
successful volume over total cube volume
copeland 2016-02-03 20:09:02
We need to find the subset of the unit cube where all of these inequalities hold and compute its volume. Then we divide by the total volume of the cube (which we saw is 1) and that is our probability.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:09:05
Let's focus on just one of these inequalities. How do we find where $x+y> z$?
toper2 2016-02-03 20:10:10
graph it?
claserken 2016-02-03 20:10:10
Graph
copeland 2016-02-03 20:10:13
Wait, how?
TheStrangeCharm 2016-02-03 20:10:52
draw in the plane z = x+ y
amplreneo 2016-02-03 20:10:52
$x +y = z$ is a plane D:
eswa2000 2016-02-03 20:10:52
graph x+y=z
brian22 2016-02-03 20:10:52
Graph $x+y=z$, and figure out which side we're bounding
MasterSnipes 2016-02-03 20:10:52
When x+y = z
Arginine 2016-02-03 20:10:52
graph z = x + y
copeland 2016-02-03 20:11:05
We begin by graphing $x+y=z$. Can you name 3 quick points on this plane?
MathDog0809 2016-02-03 20:11:44
1,0,1
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:11:44
0,0,0
spartan168 2016-02-03 20:11:44
0,0,0 and 0,1,1 and 1,0,1
eswa2000 2016-02-03 20:11:44
(0,0,0), (1,0,1), (0,1,1)
thomas0115 2016-02-03 20:11:44
(0,0,0), (0,1,1),(1,0,1)
Locust 2016-02-03 20:11:44
(1,0,1) (0,0,0) (0,1,1)
TigerLily14 2016-02-03 20:11:44
(0,0,0)(1,0,1)(0,1,1)
axue 2016-02-03 20:11:44
(0,0,0)
jfurf 2016-02-03 20:11:44
$(1,0,1)$ $(0,0,0)$ and $(0,1,1)$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:11:47
First off we have $0+0=0$ so $(0,0,0)$ is on the plane.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:11:48
We also have $1+0=1$ and $0+1=1$ so $(1,0,1)$ and $(0,1,1)$ are on the plane:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:11:50
copeland 2016-02-03 20:11:51
We can connect those to define the intersection of the plane with the cube:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:11:52
copeland 2016-02-03 20:12:01
What is the volume of the region where we don't get a triangle: when $x+y\leq z$?
alexli2014 2016-02-03 20:12:38
1/6
brian22 2016-02-03 20:12:38
$\frac{1}{6}$
wjq8g6 2016-02-03 20:12:38
1/6
mjoshi 2016-02-03 20:12:38
The left pyramid: 1/6
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 20:12:38
$\dfrac16$
loserboy 2016-02-03 20:12:38
1/6
spartan168 2016-02-03 20:12:38
since 0,0,1 works, it is the left side which is a tetrahedron of volume 1/6
ThorJames 2016-02-03 20:12:38
1/6
garyasho 2016-02-03 20:12:38
1/6
_--__--_ 2016-02-03 20:12:38
1/6
strategos21 2016-02-03 20:12:38
1/6
Metal_Bender19 2016-02-03 20:12:38
1/6
copeland 2016-02-03 20:12:41
This is the region containing $(0,0,1)$ which is a tetrahedron:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:12:44
copeland 2016-02-03 20:12:49
It is a pyramid with base of area $\dfrac12$ and height 1 so has total volume of $\dfrac{Bh}3=\dfrac16$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:12:50
What does this $\dfrac16$ mean probabilistically?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:13:12
Gosh, that's a confusing question, huh?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:13:24
What happens 1/6 of the time?
Locust 2016-02-03 20:13:56
Any x,y,z between [0,1] have a 1/6 chance of not satisfying x+y>z
ryanyz10 2016-02-03 20:13:56
1/6 chance of getting a triangle that doesn't satisfy x + y > z
spartan168 2016-02-03 20:13:56
Probability of 1/6 that it satisfies the first equation of the sum of x and y is less than z
wjq8g6 2016-02-03 20:13:56
x+y<z
blizzard10 2016-02-03 20:13:56
$x+y<=z$
alexli2014 2016-02-03 20:13:56
x+y <= z
akaashp11 2016-02-03 20:13:56
x + y < z
copeland 2016-02-03 20:13:59
The probability that a randomly chosen triple $(x,y,z)$ satisfies $x+y\leq z$ is equal to $\dfrac16$. Therefore a random triple will fail this particular triangle inequality $\dfrac16$ of the time.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:14:10
There are other ways to fail, of course. 1/6 of the time we fail IN THIS WAY.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:14:14
What is the probability that $z+x\leq y$?
PNPADU 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6
fishy15 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6
BobThePotato 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6 again
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6
dchen04 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6
owm 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6
Peggy 2016-02-03 20:14:31
also 1/6?
XturtleX 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6
danusv 2016-02-03 20:14:31
1/6 as well
copeland 2016-02-03 20:14:34
By symmetry, the probability that $z+x\leq y$ must also be $\dfrac16$. This is the volume of the tetrahedron below this plane:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:14:36
copeland 2016-02-03 20:14:37
Likewise, the probability that $y+z\leq x$ is also $\dfrac16$. This is the volume of the tetrahedron below this plane:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:14:44
copeland 2016-02-03 20:14:49
What do we need to do in order to find the probability we are not in any one of these regions?
idomath12345 2016-02-03 20:15:14
Add.
fishy15 2016-02-03 20:15:14
add and then subtract from one
duruphi 2016-02-03 20:15:14
So add the probablities together and get 1/2?
idomath12345 2016-02-03 20:15:14
And subtract from 1.
math1012 2016-02-03 20:15:14
subtract from 1
garyasho 2016-02-03 20:15:14
Add: 1/6 * 3 = 1/2
copeland 2016-02-03 20:15:21
That doesn't sound like enough to me. . .
copeland 2016-02-03 20:15:32
We certainly need to chop off all 3 tetrahedra and compute the volume of the remaining region. However, what do we need to worry about?
ThorJames 2016-02-03 20:16:06
find the intersection of them
BobThePotato 2016-02-03 20:16:06
overlapping areas
Locust 2016-02-03 20:16:06
If they overlap anywhere
claserken 2016-02-03 20:16:06
intersection
spin8 2016-02-03 20:16:06
intersections
amcwu 2016-02-03 20:16:06
overlap
XturtleX 2016-02-03 20:16:06
overlap
A1012 2016-02-03 20:16:06
overcounting
coconut_force 2016-02-03 20:16:06
if they overlap
Math99 2016-02-03 20:16:06
overlap
yiqun 2016-02-03 20:16:06
overlapping
copeland 2016-02-03 20:16:10
We will be in trouble if the regions overlap since that would make it easy to over- or undercount the regions of overlap. Is that a problem here?
thomas0115 2016-02-03 20:16:39
the 3 tetrahedrons are disjoint, so we can just subtract
TheStrangeCharm 2016-02-03 20:16:39
these three bad events are all disjoint clearly
brian22 2016-02-03 20:16:39
Well they don't intersect, so we can just add and complement
geogirl08 2016-02-03 20:16:39
they don't intersect
MathWhizzz 2016-02-03 20:16:39
wait htey obviously dont overlap
copeland 2016-02-03 20:16:53
No! If $x+y\leq z$ then $z$ is the longest edge. Likewise if $y+z\leq x$ then $x$ is longest and if $z+x\leq y$ then $y$ is longest. The only places these regions can possibly overlap is when 2 of the edges are equal and the third is zero. The overlapping regions are lines so they have volume 0 and we can ignore them.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:17:16
So they actually DO overlap, but only trivially so.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:17:46
What is the probability that we don't form a triangle when we pick a triple $(x,y,z)?$
A1012 2016-02-03 20:18:13
So the answer is 1/2?
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1-1/6-1/6-1/6=1/2 (C)
amplreneo 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
MasterSnipes 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
happyribbon 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
cinamon 2016-02-03 20:18:13
(C) 1/2
Hydrahead 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1-(1/6*3)
mathguy623 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
FrostBlitz 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
MathDog0809 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
picoo 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
mathproash2 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
Interest 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
Locust2 2016-02-03 20:18:13
1/2
copeland 2016-02-03 20:18:18
Since the overlaps have volume 0, the probability that our $(x,y,z)$ lands in one of the invalid tetrahedra is $\dfrac16+\dfrac16+\dfrac16=\dfrac12$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:18:19
The probability we can't construct a triangle is complementary to the probability we do pick a triangle so the final probability is $1-\dfrac12=\boxed{\dfrac12}.$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:18:43
Note that the answer is somehow not $\dfrac12$, but instead it is $1-\dfrac12$. This is one thing I don't like about this problem.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:18:49
So I should admit that I wanted to solve the problem that way first and led you along the harder path.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:18:57
I know for sure that (at least) one of the numbers is largest. Let's say it is $z.$ Then what are the possible values for $x$ and $y?$
ninjataco 2016-02-03 20:19:47
0 through z
fishy15 2016-02-03 20:19:47
z>x, z>y
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:19:47
0<x<z
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:19:47
0<y<z
copeland 2016-02-03 20:19:51
For any $z,$ if $z$ is the largest value then $(x,y)$ must be chosen in a square of size $z\times z$:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:19:52
copeland 2016-02-03 20:19:57
And which values of $(x,y)$ form a triangle with our $z$?
thomas0115 2016-02-03 20:20:36
x+y>=z
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 20:20:36
Top right half
jfurf 2016-02-03 20:20:36
$x+y>z$
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:20:36
x+y>z
A1012 2016-02-03 20:20:36
x+y>z
mjoshi 2016-02-03 20:20:36
x+y>z
copeland 2016-02-03 20:20:39
If we know $z$ is the longest edge then $(x,y,z)$ forms a triangle whenever $x+y\geq z.$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:20:40
copeland 2016-02-03 20:20:43
So if $z$ is the biggest number, what is the probability that we can form a triangle?
strategos21 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
mathwizard888 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
blizzard10 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
duruphi 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
spin8 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
dchen04 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
bigboss 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
happyribbon 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
toper2 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
aq1048576 2016-02-03 20:21:05
1/2
copeland 2016-02-03 20:21:08
For each $z$, if $z$ is the biggest number this probability is 1/2. Therefore the probability that we can form a triangle assuming $z$ is biggest is 1/2.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:21:09
If $x$ is biggest, what is the probability we can form a triangle?
baseballcat 2016-02-03 20:21:26
1/2
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:21:26
1/2
Metal_Bender19 2016-02-03 20:21:26
1/2
MathDog0809 2016-02-03 20:21:26
1/2 too
math1012 2016-02-03 20:21:26
1/2
geogirl08 2016-02-03 20:21:26
still 1/2
spartan168 2016-02-03 20:21:26
1/2
ThorJames 2016-02-03 20:21:26
1/2
cinamon 2016-02-03 20:21:26
ditto
copeland 2016-02-03 20:21:29
If $x$ is biggest, the probability is still 1/2. Likewise if $y$ is biggest. So what?
math1012 2016-02-03 20:21:47
the answer is 1/2 !
alexli2014 2016-02-03 20:21:47
its always 1/2
thomas0115 2016-02-03 20:21:47
the overall probability is also 1/2
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 20:21:47
The answer is 1/2
mssmath 2016-02-03 20:21:47
1/2
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:21:47
The answer is 1/2?
lkarhat 2016-02-03 20:21:47
the total proboality is 1/2
goldypeng 2016-02-03 20:21:47
still 1/2
copeland 2016-02-03 20:21:49
Those are all the cases! No matter which variable is biggest, the probability we can form a triangle is 1/2.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:21:50
We can look back on our pictures and see this argument in action. The set of points where $z$ is biggest is a square pyramid:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:21:54
copeland 2016-02-03 20:22:02
Picking a particular $z$ gives us a square cross-section:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:22:03
copeland 2016-02-03 20:22:17
And we get a red and green triangular pyramid with base area 1/2 and height 1, so we're equally likely to be in the red or green pyramid.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:22:23
copeland 2016-02-03 20:22:29
The whole cube breaks into three such pairs of equally likely pyramids to half the time we are in a "success" region and half the time we are in a "fail" region. The answer is again $\dfrac12.$
duruphi 2016-02-03 20:22:55
So the answer is C!
goldypeng 2016-02-03 20:22:55
So the answer is 1/2 (C)?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:22:59
The answer is very much $C$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:23:01
Are we having fun yet?
XturtleX 2016-02-03 20:23:14
yes
owm 2016-02-03 20:23:14
yep!!!
PNPADU 2016-02-03 20:23:14
yes
spin8 2016-02-03 20:23:14
YES
awesomethree 2016-02-03 20:23:14
YES
Locust 2016-02-03 20:23:14
YEAH
GrilledOnions 2016-02-03 20:23:14
Yes!
akaashp11 2016-02-03 20:23:14
Next one please!!
copeland 2016-02-03 20:23:17
Next up is. . .
akaashp11 2016-02-03 20:23:39
24!!!
lcalvert99 2016-02-03 20:23:39
24
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:23:39
24!
awesomethree 2016-02-03 20:23:39
24
owm 2016-02-03 20:23:39
24
Math99 2016-02-03 20:24:24
why don't you have to divide by three based on whether x is the biggest, y is the biggest, or z is the biggest?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:24:32
Here's a good question. You don't want to divide by 3. You want to take some sort of (weighted) average of the halves. Since they're all 1/2, it doesn't even matter that the weights are equal.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:24:36
Alright, Problem 24:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:24:38
24. There is a smallest positive real number $a$ such that there exists a positive number $b$ such that all the roots of the polynomial $x^3 - ax^2 + bx - a$ are real. In fact, for this value of $a$ the value of $b$ is unique. What is the value of $b$?
$\phantom{12A:24}$
(A) $8 \qquad$ (B) $9 \qquad$ (C) $10 \qquad$ (D) $11 \qquad$ (E) 12
copeland 2016-02-03 20:24:46
First, does having $a$ and $b$ positive tell us anything about the roots?
brian22 2016-02-03 20:25:29
all positive
ThorJames 2016-02-03 20:25:29
the roots are positive
math1012 2016-02-03 20:25:29
all roots are positive
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:25:29
roots are positive
ninjataco 2016-02-03 20:25:29
all positive
mathwizard888 2016-02-03 20:25:29
all positive
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:25:29
All of the roots are positive?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:25:30
Since $a$ and $b$ are positive, Descartes Rule of Signs tells us that all the roots must be positive. You can also see this directly since if you substitute any negative value for $x$ you get the sum of four negative real numbers (and substituting 0 gives $-a\neq0$).
copeland 2016-02-03 20:25:36
Now how should we approach this problem?
Locust 2016-02-03 20:26:02
Use Vietas
jfurf 2016-02-03 20:26:02
VIETA'S!!
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:26:02
Vietas
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:26:02
vieta's formula
SimonSun 2016-02-03 20:26:02
vietas
akaashp11 2016-02-03 20:26:02
Vieta??
mssmath 2016-02-03 20:26:02
Let u,v,w be the roots and then use vieat's formulas
ryanyz10 2016-02-03 20:26:02
vietas?
owm 2016-02-03 20:26:02
Vieta
math1012 2016-02-03 20:26:02
viete's
fishy15 2016-02-03 20:26:02
vieta
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 20:26:02
Vieta's?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:26:06
Since we have 3 real roots we can give them names and use Vieta. Let the roots be $r,$ $s,$ and $t.$ Then \begin{align*}x^3-ax^2+bx-a&=(x-r)(x-s)(x-t)\\&=x^3-(r+s+t)x^2+(rs+st+tr)x-(rst)x.\end{align*}
copeland 2016-02-03 20:26:08
Therefore \begin{align*}
a&=r+s+t,\\
b&=rs+st+tr,\\
a&=rst.
\end{align*}
copeland 2016-02-03 20:26:09
What can we do with the two expressions that are equal to $a$?
mssmath 2016-02-03 20:27:25
r+s+t=rst
Interest 2016-02-03 20:27:25
set them equal
amcwu 2016-02-03 20:27:25
set them equal
fractal161 2016-02-03 20:27:25
equate them?
owm 2016-02-03 20:27:25
rst=r+s+t
yiqun 2016-02-03 20:27:25
rst=r+s+t
Natsu_Dragneel 2016-02-03 20:27:25
set them equal
MasterSnipes 2016-02-03 20:27:25
MAKE EM EQUAL
copeland 2016-02-03 20:27:26
We could do that. That would give us some way to eliminate variables, but it really kills the symmetry.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:27:30
Any other ideas?
ychen 2016-02-03 20:28:16
amgm
bharatputra 2016-02-03 20:28:16
am-gm
mssmath 2016-02-03 20:28:16
Use AM-GM, in particular $xyz=x+y+z\ge3(xyz)^{\frac{1}{3}}$
brian22 2016-02-03 20:28:16
AM-GM FTW
copeland 2016-02-03 20:28:22
Those values are reminiscent of the AM-GM inequality. The AM-GM inequality states that the arithmetic mean of a set of nonnegative numbers is greater than or equal to the set's geometric mean. See our Wiki for more details:
https://www.artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=Arithmetic_Mean-Geometric_Mean_Inequality
copeland 2016-02-03 20:28:26
What do we get from AM-GM?
ninjataco 2016-02-03 20:29:34
a/3 >= a^(1/3)
fractal161 2016-02-03 20:29:34
a >= 3sqrt3
ychen 2016-02-03 20:29:34
a = 3 root 3
blizzard10 2016-02-03 20:29:34
$r+s+t>=3\sqrt[3]{rst}$
mjoshi 2016-02-03 20:29:34
a>=3a^{1/3}
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:29:34
xyz≥3xyz^(1/3)
scfliu5 2016-02-03 20:29:34
a/3>=a^(1/3)
claserken 2016-02-03 20:29:34
(x+y+z)/3 = cube root of xyz
copeland 2016-02-03 20:29:38
Since all three roots are positive, AM-GM tells us that \[\sqrt[3]{rst}\leq\frac{r+s+t}3.\](The left side is the geometric mean and the right side is the arithmetic mean.)
copeland 2016-02-03 20:29:44
In this case we have \[\sqrt[3]a\leq \frac a3.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:29:51
Cubing gives $a\leq \dfrac{a^3}{27}$ or $27\leq a^2$. Taking the square root gives $a\geq 3\sqrt3$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:30:15
What does that tell us?
Alanshenkerman 2016-02-03 20:31:06
smallest value of a = 3sqrt3
wjq8g6 2016-02-03 20:31:06
a = 3sqrt3 since we want the smallest a
Locust 2016-02-03 20:31:06
the smallest value of a is $3\sqrt{3}$
ethanproz 2016-02-03 20:31:06
Since $a$ must be minimum, $a=3\sqrt{3}$
blizzard10 2016-02-03 20:31:06
$3\sqrt{3}$ is the smallest possible value for a
copeland 2016-02-03 20:31:08
Close! We do want the smallest value, but we're not quiet home yet, right?
akaashp11 2016-02-03 20:31:38
We need to make b unique
mssmath 2016-02-03 20:31:38
We now have to find b
blizzard10 2016-02-03 20:31:38
The value of b must be unique
psolver1 2016-02-03 20:31:38
We need to find b
shark0416 2016-02-03 20:31:38
we need to see when b is positive?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:31:44
Since we're looking for the minimum value of $a$ with some certain properties, we know the target value for $a$ is at least $3\sqrt3$. Specifically, we know that if there are to be 3 real roots to any such equation, we must have $a$ at least this large. We still have not looked into $b$ so we still do not know whether such a $b$ exists.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:31:55
Assuming that $a=3\sqrt3$, what are the roots?
brian22 2016-02-03 20:32:37
ALSO, we have the equality case of AM-GM if we want minimum value, so $r=s=t$ to get $a=3\sqrt{3}$
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:32:37
$x=y=z=\sqrt{3},P(x)=(x-\sqrt{3})^3$
math1012 2016-02-03 20:32:37
$\sqrt{3}$
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 20:32:37
All of them are $\sqrt3$
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:32:37
triple root at x-root(3)
Peggy 2016-02-03 20:32:37
all roots are $\sqrt{3}$
eswa2000 2016-02-03 20:32:37
all sqrt{3}
fractal161 2016-02-03 20:32:37
all sqrt3
copeland 2016-02-03 20:32:44
Since $a=3\sqrt3$ is the "equality case" of AM-GM, the only possible values of the roots are $r=s=t=\sqrt3$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:32:45
And what is $b$?
SimonSun 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
spartan168 2016-02-03 20:33:28
3 + 3 + 3 = 9
aq1048576 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
MasterSnipes 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
shark0416 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
wjq8g6 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
Peggy 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
fishy15 2016-02-03 20:33:28
rs + rt +st =9
mjoshi 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
TigerLily14 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9 (B)
aq1048576 2016-02-03 20:33:28
BBBB
loserboy 2016-02-03 20:33:28
9
dchen04 2016-02-03 20:33:32
9
Sophiarulz 2016-02-03 20:33:32
9
MathDog0809 2016-02-03 20:33:32
rs+st+rt=9
ThorJames 2016-02-03 20:33:32
$9$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:33:34
The value of $b$ is \
copeland 2016-02-03 20:33:37
Is this the answer?
lkarhat 2016-02-03 20:34:11
Yes
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 20:34:11
Yes!!!
TheBlackBeltGuy 2016-02-03 20:34:11
yes
copeland 2016-02-03 20:34:13
This is the answer. We know that $a$ must be at least $3\sqrt3$ in order for $b$ to exist. If $a=3\sqrt3$, this value of $b$ exists and indeed is unique. The answer is $\boxed{9},$ $B$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:34:24
Alright, now what?
MaYang 2016-02-03 20:34:53
25
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:34:53
25
spartan168 2016-02-03 20:34:53
The final question
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 20:34:53
Last question?
goldypeng 2016-02-03 20:34:53
Last Problem!!!!!!!
Quinn 2016-02-03 20:34:53
25!
duruphi 2016-02-03 20:34:53
NUMBER 25!!! THE FINALE!!!
claserken 2016-02-03 20:34:53
Number 25!!!
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:34:53
25!
copeland 2016-02-03 20:34:58
25. Let $k$ be a positive integer. Bernardo and Silvia take turns writing and erasing numbers on a blackboard as follows: Bernardo starts by writing the smallest perfect square with $k + 1$ digits. Every time Bernardo writes a number, Silvia erases the last $k$ digits of it. Bernardo then writes the next perfect square, Silvia erases the last $k$ digits of it, and this process continues until the last two numbers that remain on the board differ by at least 2. Let $f(k)$ be the smallest positive integer not written on the board. For example, if $k = 1$, then the numbers that Bernardo writes are 16, 25, 36, 49, and 64, and the numbers showing on the board after Silvia erases are 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, and thus $f(1) = 5$. What is the sum of the digits of $f(2) + f(4) + f(6) + \cdots + f(2016)$?
$\phantom{12A:25}$
(A) $7986 \qquad$ (B) $8002 \qquad$ (C) $8030 \qquad$ (D) $8048 \qquad$ (E) 8064
copeland 2016-02-03 20:35:04
OK, so it took me a lot of failing at this problem before I figured out exactly what was wanted here. First of all, Bernardo is making a list of squares, such as, for $k=2$:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:35:10
\begin{array}{c|ccccccccccccccc}
\text{Bernardo}&
100&
121&
144&
169&
196&
225&
256&
289&
324&
361&
400&
441&
484&
529&
576&
625&
676&
729&
785&
841&
900&
961
\end{array}
copeland 2016-02-03 20:35:17
(Scroll right. . . )
copeland 2016-02-03 20:35:21
As he's doing this, Silvia is changing his list by striking off the last 2 digits:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:35:22
\begin{array}{c|ccccccccccccccc}
\text{Bernardo}&
100&
121&
144&
169&
196&
225&
256&
289&
324&
361&
400&
441&
484&
529&
576&
625&
676&
729&
784&
841&
900&
961&
\cdots\\
\hline
\text{Silvia}&
1\phantom{00}&
1\phantom{21}&
1\phantom{44}&
1\phantom{69}&
1\phantom{96}&
2\phantom{25}&
2\phantom{56}&
2\phantom{89}&
3\phantom{24}&
3\phantom{61}&
4\phantom{00}&
4\phantom{41}&
4\phantom{84}&
5\phantom{29}&
5\phantom{76}&
6\phantom{25}&
6\phantom{76}&
7\phantom{29}&
7\phantom{84}&
8\phantom{41}&
9\phantom{00}&
9\phantom{61}&
\cdots\\
\end{array}
copeland 2016-02-03 20:35:38
The next square 1024. What does Silvia end up with?
axue 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
amcwu 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
celestialphoenix3768 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
scfliu5 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
SimonSun 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
Math99 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
blizzard10 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
ryanyz10 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
stevenrgao 2016-02-03 20:36:24
10
copeland 2016-02-03 20:36:27
Killing the last 2 digits of 1024 leaves just 10 on the board. With $k=2$ still, the sequence continues as
copeland 2016-02-03 20:36:28
\begin{array}{c|cccccccccccccccc}
\text{Bernardo}&
\cdots&
1024&
1089&
1156&
1225&
1369&
1444&
1521&
1600&
1681&
1764&
1849&
1936&
2025&
2116&
2209&
2304&
2401\\
\hline
\text{Silvia}&
\cdots&
10\phantom{24}&
10\phantom{89}&
11\phantom{56}&
12\phantom{25}&
13\phantom{69}&
14\phantom{44}&
15\phantom{21}&
16\phantom{00}&
16\phantom{81}&
17\phantom{64}&
18\phantom{49}&
19\phantom{36}&
20\phantom{25}&
21\phantom{16}&
22\phantom{09}&
23\phantom{04}&
24\phantom{01}\\
\end{array}
copeland 2016-02-03 20:36:29
When are they supposed to stop writing?
maxplanck 2016-02-03 20:37:08
when a first digit is skipped
PNPADU 2016-02-03 20:37:08
smallest positive integer
Emathmaster 2016-02-03 20:37:08
When it differs by 2
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:37:08
differ by 2
Peggy 2016-02-03 20:37:08
when silvia skips a number
fishy15 2016-02-03 20:37:08
until numbers differ by 2
math1012 2016-02-03 20:37:08
when Silvia's differ by at least 2
hexagram 2016-02-03 20:37:08
When Silvia's numbers get >=2 apart
copeland 2016-02-03 20:37:12
So far, the neighboring numbers in Silvia's list are all either equal or one greater. They stop writing the first time two consecutive numbers in Silvia's list jump by more than 1.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:37:16
That is, they stop writing when neighboring numbers are $n$ and $m$ with $m>n+1$. And what does that make $f(k)?$
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:38:21
n+1
blizzard10 2016-02-03 20:38:21
f(k)=n+1
eswa2000 2016-02-03 20:38:21
n+1
Peggy 2016-02-03 20:38:21
n+1
baseballcat 2016-02-03 20:38:21
n+1?
akaashp11 2016-02-03 20:38:21
n + 1
ImpossibleSphere 2016-02-03 20:38:21
n + 2
copeland 2016-02-03 20:38:24
When they stop writing, the first number skipped is $f(k)$. (So $n+1$ in our example.)
copeland 2016-02-03 20:38:26
OK, now we have the setup. Let's do some math!
copeland 2016-02-03 20:38:27
First, let's agree to talk about a specific $k$ so for now $k$ is fixed.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:38:35
Let us start by setting up some variable. What is a nice thing to look at?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:39:13
What should our variable represent?
aq1048576 2016-02-03 20:40:07
the root of the square?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:40:13
Bernardo is writing a bunch of numbers.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:40:22
We want to be able to talk about those numbers.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:40:27
It would be nice to talk about the terms of this sequence so let's let the number Bernardo writes $b^2.$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:40:32
We should be able to figure out what number Silvia creates. If Bernardo writes $b^2$ and Silvia erases the last $k$ digits of $b^2$ then what number is left?
ninjataco 2016-02-03 20:41:57
floor(b^2 / 10^k) ?
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:41:57
floor of b^2/10^k
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:41:57
floor(b^2/10^k)
atmchallenge 2016-02-03 20:41:57
$\left \lfloor \frac{b^2}{10^k} \right \rfloor$
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:41:57
$\left\lfloor \frac{b^2}{10^k} \right\rfloor$
_--__--_ 2016-02-03 20:41:57
If // means integer division, b^2 // 10^k
loserboy 2016-02-03 20:41:57
floor(b^2/10^k)
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:00
We can find Silvia's number by rounding $b^2$ down to the nearest multiple of $10^k$ and then dividing by $10^k$. That is the same as dividing by $10^k$ and then rounding down to the nearest integer. Mathematically, this is written
\[s(b)=\left\lfloor
\frac{b^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:09
Now, as we increment $b$, the value of $s$ increases. Since it is quadratic in $b$, the value of $s(b)$ increases slowly at first and then grows faster.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:18
For our $k=2$ example above, we had to start at $b=10$ and $s(10)=1$. Here are $s(b)$ for $b$ between 10 and 50 when $k=2$:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:26
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:32
Incidentally, this is the floor of the graph of $f(b)=\dfrac{b^2}{100}$:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:33
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:41
We care about the first point $b$ where $s(b+1)-s(b)>1$. Let's write that down:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:43
\[
\left\lfloor
\frac{(b+1)^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor
-\left\lfloor
\frac{b^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor>1.
\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:42:55
When $b$ is little, this doesn't grow very much. Roughly when is the first chance we get for $s$ to skip an integer?
mssmath 2016-02-03 20:44:22
$b=\sqrt{10^k}$
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:44:22
s approx. 50
copeland 2016-02-03 20:44:27
OK, why? What are we doing here?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:46:04
Let's make this more abstract. What must be true in order for $\lfloor x\rfloor-\lfloor y\rfloor > 1?$
aq1048576 2016-02-03 20:46:42
x must be at least 1 greater then y
looyee2001 2016-02-03 20:46:42
X>=Y+1
aq1048576 2016-02-03 20:46:42
x must be 1+ more than y
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:46:42
$x-y>1 and x,y\in\Bbb{Z}$
ychen 2016-02-03 20:46:42
x - y > 1
copeland 2016-02-03 20:46:47
For that to be true, $x$ and $y$ must certainly be at least 1 apart.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:46:56
That holds here as well.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:46:58
If
\[
\frac{(b+1)^2}{10^{k}}
-
\frac{b^2}{10^{k}}
\leq1
\]
then there is no chance for $s$ to skip an integer. That is, if two real numbers differ by less than 1, their floors must differ by 1 or 0.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:47:07
So what do we know about $b$?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:48:25
I asked you for too many steps at once, sorry.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:48:41
First, we just argued that we need that difference to be at least 1:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:48:55
\[
\frac{(b+1)^2}{10^{k}}
-
\frac{b^2}{10^{k}}
>1
\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:49:02
What does that tell us?
mathbeida 2016-02-03 20:49:50
2b >= 10^k
mjoshi 2016-02-03 20:49:50
2b+1>10^k
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:49:50
$2b+1>10^k$
ychen 2016-02-03 20:49:50
2b + 1 > 10^ k
macandcheese 2016-02-03 20:49:50
2b+1>10^k
mathbeida 2016-02-03 20:49:50
(2b+1)/10^k >1
Peggy 2016-02-03 20:49:50
b > (10^k - 1)/2
lkarhat 2016-02-03 20:49:50
2b + 1 > 10^k
subarudl87 2016-02-03 20:49:50
2b+1 > 10^k
geogirl08 2016-02-03 20:49:50
2b+1 > 10^k
copeland 2016-02-03 20:50:03
\[
\frac{b^2+2b+1-b^2}{10^{k}}
>1
\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:50:06
That simplifies to
\[
2b+1> 10^{k}
\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:50:10
In fact, $2b$ is even so we really have
\[2b\geq10^k.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:50:15
The first $b$ for which $s$ skips an integer satisfies the ineqality\[b\geq5\cdot10^{k-1}\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:50:25
However, let's think a little about this. When $k=6$, say, we have $b\geq 500{,}000$. The square of $500{,}000$ is $250{,}000{,}000{,}000$. Silvia is going to drop the last 6 zeroes from this and get $250{,}000$. We didn't round down at all!
copeland 2016-02-03 20:50:57
Will we skip an integer going to $s(500{,}001)?$
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:51:27
no
mathwizard888 2016-02-03 20:51:27
no
ychen 2016-02-03 20:51:27
no?
owm 2016-02-03 20:51:27
no
copeland 2016-02-03 20:51:29
Why not?
ychen 2016-02-03 20:52:37
because you start with 0 mod 1000000
geogirl08 2016-02-03 20:52:37
no. 250001000001 => 250001.
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:52:37
all 0's
owm 2016-02-03 20:52:37
because 500001^=250001000001
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:52:37
250001000001
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 20:52:37
it is 250001000001
copeland 2016-02-03 20:52:50
No. We actually don't even have to compute this, though. We know that we are just now passing the point where $\dfrac{b^2}{10^6}$ increases by 1. Since $\dfrac{500{,}000^2}{10^6}$ is an integer and $\dfrac{500{,}001^2}{10^6}$ is very, very close to 1 more than it, we know $s(500{,}001)$ must be $250{,}001$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:53:30
Those of you who did compute noticed that we only lost 0.000001 when we rounded down. Plenty of wiggle room left.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:53:35
In order for two numbers that differ by about 1 to "round down" to numbers that differ by two, the smaller number must be just under an integer and the larger number must be just past the next integer:
copeland 2016-02-03 20:53:44
copeland 2016-02-03 20:53:48
So we're looking for a number that may even be a lot bigger than $5\cdot10^{k-1}$.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:54:02
Any ideas what to do now?
mssmath 2016-02-03 20:54:48
try 500000+x
copeland 2016-02-03 20:54:55
This is the point in the problem where I gave up on actually thinking and just threw more arithmetic/variables/machinery at the problem.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:54:57
Let's write $b=5\cdot10^{k-1}+c.$ Then
\[
s(b)=\left\lfloor
\frac{(5\cdot10^{k-1}+c)^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:55:06
There's a nice theoretical underpinning to writing $b$ like this. We should think of $5\cdot10^{k-1}$ as a "first-order approximation" to $b$. That is, we expect this to be a pretty good approximation for $b$, especially when $k$ is really large. But we also know it's not right, so we "correct" our approximation. We call $c$ the "second order correction" for our approximation. If all our guesses are right, $c$ should be a lot smaller than $b$, but it should be able to fix any of the problems with our approximation.
mathguy5041 2016-02-03 20:55:31
expand
copeland 2016-02-03 20:55:35
What happens when we expand that?
copeland 2016-02-03 20:55:43
I'll give you a few moments.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:56:04
And remember that we care about $k\geq2$.
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 20:58:06
$s(b)=\left\lfloor\frac{25\cdot10^{2k-2}+10^k*c+c^2}{10^k}\right\rfloor$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:58:53
\begin{align*}
s(5\cdot10^{k-1}+c)&=\left\lfloor
\frac{(5\cdot10^{k-1}+c)^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor\\
&=
\left\lfloor
\frac{25\cdot10^{2k-2}+10\cdot10^{k-1}c+c^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor\\
&=
\left\lfloor
25\cdot10^{k-2}+c+\frac{c^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor
\end{align*}
copeland 2016-02-03 20:58:55
That's easier to read.
copeland 2016-02-03 20:59:28
Now what?
Alanshenkerman 2016-02-03 20:59:39
take out the 25*10^k-2 and c as they are integers
owm 2016-02-03 20:59:39
the part with no fraction can be taken out of the floor function
goodbear 2016-02-03 20:59:41
$25\cdot10^{k-2}+c+\left\lfloor \frac{c^2}{10^{k}} \right\rfloor$
copeland 2016-02-03 20:59:47
Now $k\geq2$ for all the terms in the sum we care about so the first two numbers are integers:
\[
s(5\cdot10^{k-1}+c)
=
\left\lfloor
25\cdot10^{k-2}+c+\frac{c^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor
=
25\cdot10^{k-2}+c+
\left\lfloor
\frac{c^2}{10^{k}}
\right\rfloor.
\]
copeland 2016-02-03 20:59:48
Now tell me what happens to $s$ as we increase $c$ starting at 0.
mathwizard888 2016-02-03 21:01:26
keeps going up by 1 until the last term hits 1
mssmath 2016-02-03 21:01:26
We just need $\floor{c^2/10^k}=1$ instead of 0 now
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 21:01:26
It stays 0 until it goes over $10^{\frac k2}$
eswa2000 2016-02-03 21:01:26
s stays the same until c reaches sqrt{10^k}
ychen 2016-02-03 21:01:26
it increases by 1 until c^2 >= 10^k
copeland 2016-02-03 21:01:31
When $c$ is small, that last floor is zero, and incrementing $c$ only increases the "$+c$" part, so $s$ increases by 1.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:01:35
When does it skip an integer?
eswa2000 2016-02-03 21:02:30
c reaches sqrt{10^k}
jfurf 2016-02-03 21:02:30
When $c^2=10^k$
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 21:02:30
$c^2\geq 10^k$
TigerLily14 2016-02-03 21:02:30
when the last part is greater than 1 (rounds down to 1)
mssmath 2016-02-03 21:02:30
$c\ge10^{\frac{k}{2}}$
aq1048576 2016-02-03 21:02:30
when the last term reaches 1?
mathwizard888 2016-02-03 21:02:30
at $c=10^{k/2}$
copeland 2016-02-03 21:02:34
It skips an integer when the floor goes from 0 to 1. That means we skip an integer the first time $\left\lfloor\dfrac{c^2}{10^k}\right\rfloor=1$.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:02:36
Great. Now we just need to think about when $\sqrt{\dfrac{c^2}{10^k}}\approx1$. What's going to help us a lot in finishing the problem?
copeland 2016-02-03 21:02:41
Look back at the problem statement. . .
SimonSun 2016-02-03 21:03:14
sum up from 2.. 2016
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 21:03:14
sum of digits
copeland 2016-02-03 21:03:16
What's particularly useful about that sum?
mssmath 2016-02-03 21:04:23
k=2l
mathwizard888 2016-02-03 21:04:23
k is even
akaashp11 2016-02-03 21:04:23
sum of even integers in x^2
geogirl08 2016-02-03 21:04:23
Sum of evens n(n+1)
copeland 2016-02-03 21:04:26
We only care when $k$ is even!
copeland 2016-02-03 21:04:27
So what is $c$?
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 21:05:18
$10^{\frac k2}$
aq1048576 2016-02-03 21:05:18
10^{k/2}
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 21:05:18
10^(k/2)
owm 2016-02-03 21:05:18
c=10^{k/2}
copeland 2016-02-03 21:05:21
The value of $c$ where we skip our first integer is $c=\sqrt{10^k}=10^{k/2}.$
copeland 2016-02-03 21:05:28
When we plug this value of $c$ in we get
\[s(5\cdot10^{k-1}+10^{k/2})=25\cdot10^{k-2}+10^{k/2}+1.\]
copeland 2016-02-03 21:05:32
What number did we skip?
copeland 2016-02-03 21:07:21
So. . . we determined that this particular value of $c$ is the place where the floor flips from 0 to 1. This is the value at that $c$. What happened with Silvia's sequence?
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 21:07:51
1 less than that number
ThorJames 2016-02-03 21:07:51
it skipped a number
copeland 2016-02-03 21:08:11
We finally skipped a number.
aq1048576 2016-02-03 21:08:20
25*10^{k-2}+10^{k/2}
copeland 2016-02-03 21:08:22
We skipped $25\cdot10^{k-2}+10^{k/2}$.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:08:29
Now we finish by adding these up, starting at $k=2$ and finishing at $k=2016$.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:08:31
That looks a bit like:
\begin{array}{rr}
&25\cdot10^0+10^1\\
&25\cdot10^2+10^2\\
&25\cdot10^4+10^3\\
&25\cdot10^6+10^4\\
&25\cdot10^8+10^5\\
+&25\cdot10^{10}+10^6\\
\hline
\end{array}
copeland 2016-02-03 21:08:32
This problem never ends, huh. . . .
copeland 2016-02-03 21:08:41
I can make those into for-real numbers, though:
\begin{array}{rr}
&35\\
&2600\\
&251000\\
&25010000\\
&2500100000\\
+&250001000000\\
\hline
\end{array}
copeland 2016-02-03 21:08:44
And when we write this super-big number out and add its digits, what happens?
mssmath 2016-02-03 21:09:56
Their is no carrying so just add the digits for the win
geogirl08 2016-02-03 21:09:56
8+8+8+8+...... (1008 8's in all)
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 21:09:56
8n
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 21:09:56
1008*8
SmallKid 2016-02-03 21:09:56
It becomes 8064?
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 21:09:56
8064
ychen 2016-02-03 21:09:56
each row sum up to 8
copeland 2016-02-03 21:10:01
In that expression, the 25s move to the left very fast and the ones also move to the left. The 1s always appear in subsequently larger places. Likewise for the 2s and 5s.
Specifically, no place value will ever get more than $1+2+5$, so there will never be any carrying. Therefore each term contributes $1+2+5=8$ to the final digit sum.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:10:13
And the answer?
goldypeng 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E is the answer
yiqun 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E
geogirl08 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E
SimonSun 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E
jfurf 2016-02-03 21:10:49
$\large{\boxed{8064}}$
ychen 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E 8064
akaashp11 2016-02-03 21:10:49
$E$
happyribbon 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E
SimonSun 2016-02-03 21:10:49
8064
owm 2016-02-03 21:10:49
8*1008
deltaepsilon6 2016-02-03 21:10:49
$\boxed{E}$
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E
yiqun 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E
owm 2016-02-03 21:10:49
E
copeland 2016-02-03 21:10:52
There are 1008 total terms so the final digit sum is $8\cdot1008=\boxed{8064}$. $E$.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:11:10
Incidentally, at the end there Bernardo was squaring thousands of thousand-digit numbers.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:11:21
I imagine the time it would take just to erase everything would be substantial.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:11:53
Cool, we're done. We've gone a bit over 2 hours so I think I'm going to call it. There are a lot of really good discussions of all the problems on the forums.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:11:58
Please go join them!
copeland 2016-02-03 21:12:15
That's all for tonight's Math Jam!
copeland 2016-02-03 21:12:16
Please join us again on Thursday, February 18, when we will discuss the AMC 10B/12B contests and also again on March 5 and 18 when we will be discussing the AIME I and II contests.
copeland 2016-02-03 21:12:22
Oh, and soon you will be able to find videos for the last 5 problems of each exam on the videos page:
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Videos/index.php?type=amc
I believe that Deven and Kyle might have chosen some different tactics in their videos than we used today, so it might be worth checking them out.
yrnsmurf 2016-02-03 21:13:37
Wait should the amc 10 be discussed in the middle school or high school forum?
copeland 2016-02-03 21:13:39
In the contests forum:
http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/community/c3158_usa_contests

Copyright © 2024 AoPS Incorporated. This page is copyrighted material. You can view and print this page for your own use, but you cannot share the contents of this file with others.