Difference between revisions of "1993 IMO Problems/Problem 5"
(Created page with "==Problem== ==Solution== This is very beautiful problem. I should start with some observation, <math>f(f(1))=f(1)+1=3=f(2)</math>. <math>f(f(2))=f(2)+2=5=f(3)</math>. [c...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 03:07, 5 July 2020
Problem
Solution
This is very beautiful problem.
I should start with some observation,
.
.
[color=#f00][u]Claim(1):[/u][/color] .Here
is
th febonacchi number.
[i]Proof.[/i] we have seen this is true for assuming its true for
we can conclude,
.
it is very well know that .
so we can see that for large ,
.
To see why the above observation is true we have to look the given condition we have
now clearlycan be either
or
.here
so difference is not large .
From here we can guess can be a possible solution. where
.
\begin{tabular}{lllll}
\hline
\multicolumn{1}{|l|}{{\color{blue} n}} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{1} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{2} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{4} \ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|l|}{{\color{blue} }} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{1} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{4} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{6} \ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|l|}{{\color{blue} f(n)}} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{2} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{5} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{6,7} \ \hline
& & & &
\end{tabular}
If we put on that we must get value of
and it will same for
as well.
Now look into the following table,
\begin{tabular}{lllll}
\hline
\multicolumn{1}{|l|}{{\color{blue} n}} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{1} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{2} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{4} \ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|l|}{{\color{blue} }} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{2} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{5} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{6} \ \hline
\multicolumn{1}{|l|}{{\color{blue} f(n)}} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{2} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{3} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{5} & \multicolumn{1}{l|}{6or7} \ \hline
& & & &
\end{tabular}
From here I should my final claim which finish this problem.
[color=#960000][b][u]Claim(2):[/u][/b][/color] works.
[color=#000][i][b]proof.[/b][/i][/color] At first of all notice that .
Now assume that such that
. we hane
.
Now,
Now it is time to find out lower bound.
So only possibility is .
Again notice that .
So , can be a solution to
.
So, Yes there exists a function as defined in the question.