Difference between revisions of "1971 IMO Problems/Problem 4"
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The solution above is incomplete and/or incorrect. The first part | The solution above is incomplete and/or incorrect. The first part | ||
(which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best, | (which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best, | ||
− | since it is not clear how it leads to the result. Very likely it is | + | since it is not clear how it leads to the result. (Very likely it is |
− | incorrect. The second part, which claims to prove part (b) of the | + | incorrect.) The second part, which claims to prove part (b) of the |
− | problem skips too many steps. Some of the arguments in the proof | + | problem, skips too many steps. Some of the arguments in the proof |
− | (e.g. the fact that <math>AB \parallel A'B'</math> are true but need proof. | + | (e.g. the fact that <math>AB \parallel A'B'</math>) are true but need proof. |
− | I could make | + | I could not make any sense of other arguments in the proof, so I |
− | not judge whether they are correct or not (I suspect not). | + | can not judge whether they are correct or not (I suspect not). |
− | I will give a solution along the same basic idea. | + | I will give a robust solution below. It goes along the same basic |
+ | idea. | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
[[File:prob_1971_4_1.png|600px]] | [[File:prob_1971_4_1.png|600px]] | ||
− | Specifically, we rotate three faces around <math>BC</math> so <math>\triangle BCD</math> is | + | Specifically, we rotate the solid consisting of three faces around |
− | in the same plane as <math>\triangle ABC</math>. | + | <math>BC</math> so <math>\triangle BCD</math> is in the same plane as <math>\triangle ABC</math>. |
− | <math>CD</math> so that <math>\triangle CDA</math> is in the same plane with the previous | + | Then we rotate the solid consisting of two faces around <math>CD</math> so |
− | triangles. Finally, we rotate <math>\triangle | + | that <math>\triangle CDA'</math> is in the same plane with the previous |
− | it is in the same plane with the other triangles. We denote | + | triangles. (We denoted <math>A'</math> the new "copy" of <math>A</math>, since the |
− | <math> | + | original <math>A</math> is being used in the picture.) Finally, we rotate |
− | + | <math>\triangle A'BD</math> around <math>A'D</math>, so that it is in the same plane | |
+ | with the other triangles. (We denote <math>B'</math> the new "copy" of <math>B</math>, | ||
+ | and <math>X'</math> the new copy of <math>X</math>.) | ||
The polygonal path <math>XYZTX</math> becomes <math>XYZTX'</math>. It is clear that in order | The polygonal path <math>XYZTX</math> becomes <math>XYZTX'</math>. It is clear that in order |
Revision as of 04:04, 28 December 2024
Contents
[hide]Problem
All the faces of tetrahedron are acute-angled triangles. We consider all closed polygonal paths of the form
defined as follows:
is a point on edge
distinct from
and
; similarly,
are interior points of edges
, respectively. Prove:
(a) If , then among the polygonal paths, there is none of minimal length.
(b) If , then there are infinitely many shortest polygonal paths, their common length being
, where
.
Solution
Rotate the triangle around the edge
until
are in one plane. It is clear that in a shortest path, the point Y lies on the line connecting
and
. Therefore,
.
Summing the four equations like this, we get exactly
.
Now, draw all four faces in the plane, so that is constructed on the exterior of the edge
of
and so on with edges
and
.
The final new edge (or rather
) is parallel to the original one (because of the angle equation). Call the direction on
towards
"right" and towards
"left". If we choose a vertex
on
and connect it to the corresponding vertex
on A'B'. This works for a whole interval of vertices
if
lies to the left of
and
and
lies to the right of
. It is not hard to see that these conditions correspond to the fact that various angles are acute by assumption.
Finally, regard the sine in half the isosceles triangle which gives the result with the angles around
instead of
, but the role of the vertices is symmetric.
Remarks (added by pf02, December 2024)
The solution above is incomplete and/or incorrect. The first part
(which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best,
since it is not clear how it leads to the result. (Very likely it is
incorrect.) The second part, which claims to prove part (b) of the
problem, skips too many steps. Some of the arguments in the proof
(e.g. the fact that ) are true but need proof.
I could not make any sense of other arguments in the proof, so I
can not judge whether they are correct or not (I suspect not).
I will give a robust solution below. It goes along the same basic idea.
Solution 2
The basic idea is to "fold out" the tetrahedron into a polygon in
the plane. The path becomes a collection of connected
segments
with the unconnected ends
on
the two line segments
.
Specifically, we rotate the solid consisting of three faces around
so
is in the same plane as
.
Then we rotate the solid consisting of two faces around
so
that
is in the same plane with the previous
triangles. (We denoted
the new "copy" of
, since the
original
is being used in the picture.) Finally, we rotate
around
, so that it is in the same plane
with the other triangles. (We denote
the new "copy" of
,
and
the new copy of
.)
The polygonal path becomes
. It is clear that in order
to minimize
, we should make
be a segment on a straight
line. Furthermore, to minimize the segment
, we want to choose
so that when we draw the line segment to its corresponding
image
, the length of
is as short as possible.
[TO BE CONTINUED. SAVING MID WAY SO I DON"T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.]
See Also
1971 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |