Difference between revisions of "2011 USAJMO Problems/Problem 3"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Note that all the points <math>P=(a,a^2)</math> belong to the parabola <math>y=x^2</math> which we will denote <math>p</math>. This parabola has a focus <math>F=\left(0,\frac{1}{4}\right)</math> and directrix <math>y=-\frac{1}{4}</math> which we will denote <math>d</math>. We will prove that the desired locus is <math>d</math>. | Note that all the points <math>P=(a,a^2)</math> belong to the parabola <math>y=x^2</math> which we will denote <math>p</math>. This parabola has a focus <math>F=\left(0,\frac{1}{4}\right)</math> and directrix <math>y=-\frac{1}{4}</math> which we will denote <math>d</math>. We will prove that the desired locus is <math>d</math>. | ||
− | First note that for any point <math>P</math> on <math>p</math>, the line <math>\ell(P)</math> is the tangent line to <math>p</math> at <math>P</math>. This is because <math>\ell(P)</math> contains <math>P</math> and because <math>d | + | First note that for any point <math>P</math> on <math>p</math>, the line <math>\ell(P)</math> is the tangent line to <math>p</math> at <math>P</math>. This is because <math>\ell(P)</math> contains <math>P</math> and because <math>\frac{d}{dx} x^2=2x</math>. If you don't like calculus, you can also verify that <math>\ell(P)</math> has equation <math>y=2a(x-a)+a^2</math> and does not intersect <math>y=x^2</math> at any point besides <math>P</math>. Now for any point <math>P</math> on <math>p</math> let <math>P'</math> be the foot of the perpendicular from <math>P</math> onto <math>d</math>. Then by the definition of parabolas, <math>PP'=PF</math>. Let <math>q</math> be the perpendicular bisector of <math>\oveline{P'F}</math>. Since <math>PP'=PF</math>, <math>q</math> passes through <math>P</math>. Suppose <math>K</math> is any other point on <math>q</math> and let <math>K'</math> be the foot of the perpendicular from <math>K</math> to <math>d</math>. Then in right <math>\Delta KK'P'</math>, <math>KK'</math> is a leg and so <math>KK'<KP'=KF</math>. Therefore <math>K</math> cannot be on <math>p</math>. This implies that <math>q</math> is exactly the tangent line to <math>p</math> at <math>P</math>, that is <math>q=\ell(P)</math>. So we have proved Lemma 1: If <math>P</math> is a point on <math>p</math> then <math>\ell(P)</math> is the perpendicular bisector of <math>\overline{P'F}</math>. |
We need another lemma before we proceed. Lemma 2: If <math>F</math> is on the circumcircle of <math>\Delta XYZ</math> with orthocenter <math>H</math>, then the reflections of <math>F</math> across <math>\overleftrightarrow{XY}</math>, <math>\overleftrightarrow{XZ}</math>, and <math>\overleftrightarrow{YZ}</math> are collinear with <math>H</math>. | We need another lemma before we proceed. Lemma 2: If <math>F</math> is on the circumcircle of <math>\Delta XYZ</math> with orthocenter <math>H</math>, then the reflections of <math>F</math> across <math>\overleftrightarrow{XY}</math>, <math>\overleftrightarrow{XZ}</math>, and <math>\overleftrightarrow{YZ}</math> are collinear with <math>H</math>. |
Revision as of 09:27, 2 June 2013
Problem
For a point in the coordinate plane, let
denote the line passing through
with slope
. Consider the set of triangles with vertices of the form
,
,
, such that the intersections of the lines
,
,
form an equilateral triangle
. Find the locus of the center of
as
ranges over all such triangles.
Solution
Note that all the points belong to the parabola
which we will denote
. This parabola has a focus
and directrix
which we will denote
. We will prove that the desired locus is
.
First note that for any point on
, the line
is the tangent line to
at
. This is because
contains
and because
. If you don't like calculus, you can also verify that
has equation
and does not intersect
at any point besides
. Now for any point
on
let
be the foot of the perpendicular from
onto
. Then by the definition of parabolas,
. Let
be the perpendicular bisector of $\oveline{P'F}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg). Since
,
passes through
. Suppose
is any other point on
and let
be the foot of the perpendicular from
to
. Then in right
,
is a leg and so
. Therefore
cannot be on
. This implies that
is exactly the tangent line to
at
, that is
. So we have proved Lemma 1: If
is a point on
then
is the perpendicular bisector of
.
We need another lemma before we proceed. Lemma 2: If is on the circumcircle of
with orthocenter
, then the reflections of
across
,
, and
are collinear with
.
Proof of Lemma 2: Say the reflections of and
across
are
and
, and the reflections of
and
across
are
and
. Then we angle chase
where
is the measure of minor arc
on the circumcircle of
. This implies that
is on the circumcircle of
, and similarly
is on the circumcircle of
. Therefore
, and
. So
. Since
,
, and
are collinear it follows that
,
and
are collinear. Similarly, the reflection of
over
also lies on this line, and so the claim is proved.
Now suppose ,
, and
are three points of
and let
,
, and
. Also let
,
, and
be the midpoints of
,
, and
respectively. Then since
and
, it follows that
,
, and
are collinear. By Lemma 1, we know that
,
, and
are the feet of the altitudes from
to
,
, and
. Therefore by the Simson Line Theorem,
is on the circumcircle of
. If
is the orthocenter of
, then by Lemma 2, it follows that
is on
. It follows that the locus described in the problem is a subset of
.
Since we claim that the locus described in the problem is , we still need to show that for any choice of
on
there exists an equilateral triangle with center
such that the lines containing the sides of the triangle are tangent to
. So suppose
is any point on
and let the circle centered at
through
be
. Then suppose
is one of the intersections of
with
. Let
, and construct the ray through
on the same halfplane of
as
that makes an angle of
with
. Say this ray intersects
in a point
besides
, and let
be the perpendicular bisector of
. Since
and
, we have
. By the inscribed angles theorem, it follows that
. Also since
and
are both radii,
is isosceles and
. Let
be the reflection of
across
. Then
, and so
. It follows that
is on
, which means
is the perpendicular bisector of
.
Let intersect
in points
and
and let
be the point diametrically opposite to
on
. Also let
intersect
at
. Then
. Therefore
is a
right triangle and so
. So
and by the inscribed angles theorem,
. Since
it follows that
is and equilateral triangle with center
.
By Lemma 2, it follows that the reflections of across
and
, call them
and
, lie on
. Let the intersection of
and the perpendicular to
through
be
, the intersection of $\overleftrightarriw{XY}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg) and the perpendicular to
through
be
, and the intersection of
and the perpendicular to
through
be
. Then by the definitions of
,
, and
it follows that
for
and so
,
, and
are on
. By lemma 1,
,
, and
. Therefore the intersections of
,
, and
form an equilateral triangle with center
, which finishes the proof.
--Killbilledtoucan