Difference between revisions of "2013 Mock AIME I Problems/Problem 11"
(→Solution) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Let <math>a,b,</math> and <math>c</math> be the roots of the equation <math>x^3+2x-1=0</math>, and let <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> be the two possible values of <math>\dfrac{a}{b}+\dfrac{b}{c}+\dfrac{c}{a}.</math> Find <math>(X+1)(Y+1)</math>. | Let <math>a,b,</math> and <math>c</math> be the roots of the equation <math>x^3+2x-1=0</math>, and let <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math> be the two possible values of <math>\dfrac{a}{b}+\dfrac{b}{c}+\dfrac{c}{a}.</math> Find <math>(X+1)(Y+1)</math>. | ||
− | == Solution == | + | == Solution 1 == |
For some integer <math>n</math>, let <math>s_n</math> be <math>a^n+b^n+c^n</math>. | For some integer <math>n</math>, let <math>s_n</math> be <math>a^n+b^n+c^n</math>. | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
&= \boxed{015}. | &= \boxed{015}. | ||
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 2(Sketch) == | ||
+ | |||
+ | This solution can also be solved by using Vieta's and getting <math>a+b+c=0</math>, <math>ab+bc+ac=2</math>, <math>abc=1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then you can directly expand <math>(a^2c+b^2a+c^2b+1)(a^2b+ac^2+b^2c+1)</math>. And solve for the seperate parts. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A key step in the solution from there is realizing that <math>x^3=-2x+1</math>, which can be used to simplify by a great deal. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Bigbrain_2009 | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Latest revision as of 12:59, 31 December 2024
Contents
[hide]Problem
Let and
be the roots of the equation
, and let
and
be the two possible values of
Find
.
Solution 1
For some integer , let
be
.
Note that , so, to answer the problem, it suffices to know
and
.
Let . First, note the arbitrary decision in the expression
. Why must
be over
, but not
over
? From this observation, we can deduce that the aforementioned two possible values of this sum are
(WLOG let this be
) and
(WLOG let this be
). From these definitions and the knowledge from Vieta's Formulas that
, we can now combine fractions to get the following:
, so we look for a way to get a value for
. Fortunately, we can use Vieta again to see that
. Thus,
, and so
, or, by substitution and recalling that
,
. To get
, we think Newton Sums, which give us the following:
becomes
, so
.
Now that we have , we desire to find
. Note that Vieta gives us
, so, because
, by substitution
. By substituting our values for
and
into
, we see the following:
. To do this, we try to think of a function
whose roots are
and
.
will work. Using Newton Sums again and recalling that
, we see that:
and
, we have that
.
Thus, we can now find our desired answer:
Solution 2(Sketch)
This solution can also be solved by using Vieta's and getting ,
,
.
Then you can directly expand . And solve for the seperate parts.
A key step in the solution from there is realizing that , which can be used to simplify by a great deal.
~Bigbrain_2009