Difference between revisions of "2017 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 6"

m (Solution)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Problem==
 
==Problem==
  
What is the largest number of solid <math>2\text{in}</math> by <math>2\text{in}</math> by <math>1\text{in}</math> blocks that can fit in a <math>3\text{in}</math> by <math>2\text{in}</math> by <math>3\text{in}</math> box?
+
What is the largest number of solid <math>2\text{-in} \times 2\text{-in} \times 1\text{-in}</math> blocks that can fit in a <math>3\text{-in} \times 2\text{-in}\times3\text{-in}</math> box?
  
 
<math>\textbf{(A)}\ 3\qquad\textbf{(B)}\ 4\qquad\textbf{(C)}\ 5\qquad\textbf{(D)}\ 6\qquad\textbf{(E)}\ 7</math>
 
<math>\textbf{(A)}\ 3\qquad\textbf{(B)}\ 4\qquad\textbf{(C)}\ 5\qquad\textbf{(D)}\ 6\qquad\textbf{(E)}\ 7</math>
  
 
==Solution==
 
==Solution==
We find that the volume of the larger block is <math>18</math>, and the volume of the smaller block is <math>4</math>. Dividing the two, we see that only a maximum of <math>4</math> <math>2</math>x<math>2</math>x<math>1</math> blocks can fit inside the <math>3</math>x<math>3</math>x<math>2</math> block. <math>\boxed{\textbf{(B) }4}</math>
+
We find that the volume of the larger block is <math>18</math>, and the volume of the smaller block is <math>4</math>. Dividing the two, we see that only a maximum of four <math>2</math> by <math>2</math> by <math>1</math> blocks can fit inside the <math>3</math> by <math>3</math> by <math>2</math> block. Drawing it out, we see that such a configuration is indeed possible. Therefore, the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(B) }4}</math>.
  
 +
==Video Solution==
 +
https://youtu.be/lgdWiCz6M3c
 +
 +
~savannahsolver
 +
 +
==Video Solution by TheBeautyofMath==
 +
https://youtu.be/XRfOULUmWbY
 +
 +
~IceMatrix
 +
 +
==See Also==
  
 
{{AMC10 box|year=2017|ab=B|num-b=5|num-a=7}}
 
{{AMC10 box|year=2017|ab=B|num-b=5|num-a=7}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}

Latest revision as of 19:04, 1 May 2021

Problem

What is the largest number of solid $2\text{-in} \times 2\text{-in} \times 1\text{-in}$ blocks that can fit in a $3\text{-in} \times 2\text{-in}\times3\text{-in}$ box?

$\textbf{(A)}\ 3\qquad\textbf{(B)}\ 4\qquad\textbf{(C)}\ 5\qquad\textbf{(D)}\ 6\qquad\textbf{(E)}\ 7$

Solution

We find that the volume of the larger block is $18$, and the volume of the smaller block is $4$. Dividing the two, we see that only a maximum of four $2$ by $2$ by $1$ blocks can fit inside the $3$ by $3$ by $2$ block. Drawing it out, we see that such a configuration is indeed possible. Therefore, the answer is $\boxed{\textbf{(B) }4}$.

Video Solution

https://youtu.be/lgdWiCz6M3c

~savannahsolver

Video Solution by TheBeautyofMath

https://youtu.be/XRfOULUmWbY

~IceMatrix

See Also

2017 AMC 10B (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 5
Followed by
Problem 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png