# Difference between revisions of "2001 AMC 8 Problems/Problem 23"

## Problem

Points $R$, $S$ and $T$ are vertices of an equilateral triangle, and points $X$, $Y$ and $Z$ are midpoints of its sides. How many noncongruent triangles can be drawn using any three of these six points as vertices?

$[asy] pair SS,R,T,X,Y,Z; SS = (2,2*sqrt(3)); R = (0,0); T = (4,0); X = (2,0); Y = (1,sqrt(3)); Z = (3,sqrt(3)); dot(SS); dot(R); dot(T); dot(X); dot(Y); dot(Z); label("S",SS,N); label("R",R,SW); label("T",T,SE); label("X",X,S); label("Y",Y,NW); label("Z",Z,NE); [/asy]$

$\text{(A)}\ 1 \qquad \text{(B)}\ 2 \qquad \text{(C)}\ 3 \qquad \text{(D)}\ 4 \qquad \text{(E)}\ 20$

## Solution #1

There are $6$ points in the figure, and $3$ of them are needed to form a triangle, so there are ${6\choose{3}} =20$ possible triples of $3$ of the $6$ points. However, some of these created congruent triangles, and some don't even make triangles at all.

Case 1: Triangles congruent to $\triangle RST$ There is obviously only $1$ of these: $\triangle RST$ itself.

Case 2: Triangles congruent to $\triangle SYZ$ There are $4$ of these: $\triangle SYZ, \triangle RXY, \triangle TXZ,$ and $\triangle XYZ$.

Case 3: Triangles congruent to $\triangle RSX$ There are $6$ of these: $\triangle RSX, \triangle TSX, \triangle STY, \triangle RTY, \triangle RSZ,$ and $\triangle RTZ$.

Case 4: Triangles congruent to $\triangle SYX$ There are again $6$ of these: $\triangle SYX, \triangle SZX, \triangle TYZ, \triangle TYX, \triangle RXZ,$ and $\triangle RYZ$.

However, if we add these up, we accounted for only $1+4+6+6=17$ of the $20$ possible triplets. We see that the remaining triplets don't even form triangles; they are $SYR, RXT,$ and $TZS$. Adding these $3$ into the total yields for all of the possible triplets, so we see that there are only $4$ possible non-congruent, non-degenerate triangles, $\boxed{\text{D}}$

## Solution #2

We can do casework in this problem like the solution above, but that would take too much time. Instead, we see that we can split this equilateral dot triangle to two halves by dropping an altitude from the top vertex of the big triangle. Using the smaller triangle we won't have to worry about extra unneeded cases. We can see that there are three distinct triangles in the half, and combining this with the larger equilateral triangle our answer is $3+1 = \boxed{4}$, which is $\boxed{\text{D}}$

-FIREDRAGONMATH16