Difference between revisions of "2014 USAMO Problems/Problem 4"

(Created page with "==Problem== Let <math>k</math> be a positive integer. Two players <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> play a game on an infinite grid of regular hexagons. Initially all the grid ce...")
 
(Solution)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
==Solution==
 
==Solution==
 +
We claim that the minimum <math>k</math> such that A cannot create a <math>k</math> in a row is <math>\boxed{6}</math>.
 +
 +
It is easy to verify that player A can create a 5 in a row.
 +
 +
[Verification here]
 +
 +
Otherwise, tile the hexagon board in an A-B-C-A-B-C-A-B-C format. To prevent player A from obtaining a 6 in a row, all player B has to do is to remove counters placed on A by player A. Because no two A's are adjacent, player A can play at most one A at a time; thus, there can at most be one counter on an A tile at a time. Clearly, then, a 6 in a row, which requires A-B-C-A-B-C (or two A's), is then impossible, completing the proof.

Revision as of 18:13, 30 April 2014

Problem

Let $k$ be a positive integer. Two players $A$ and $B$ play a game on an infinite grid of regular hexagons. Initially all the grid cells are empty. Then the players alternately take turns with $A$ moving first. In his move, $A$ may choose two adjacent hexagons in the grid which are empty and place a counter in both of them. In his move, $B$ may choose any counter on the board and remove it. If at any time there are $k$ consecutive grid cells in a line all of which contain a counter, $A$ wins. Find the minimum value of $k$ for which $A$ cannot win in a finite number of moves, or prove that no such minimum value exists.

Solution

We claim that the minimum $k$ such that A cannot create a $k$ in a row is $\boxed{6}$.

It is easy to verify that player A can create a 5 in a row.

[Verification here]

Otherwise, tile the hexagon board in an A-B-C-A-B-C-A-B-C format. To prevent player A from obtaining a 6 in a row, all player B has to do is to remove counters placed on A by player A. Because no two A's are adjacent, player A can play at most one A at a time; thus, there can at most be one counter on an A tile at a time. Clearly, then, a 6 in a row, which requires A-B-C-A-B-C (or two A's), is then impossible, completing the proof.