Difference between revisions of "2019 AMC 12B Problems/Problem 16"

m (Solution 3 (Recursion))
m (Solution 1)
(15 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Problem==
 
==Problem==
Lily pads numbered from <math>0</math> to <math>11</math> lie in a row on a pond. Fiona the frog sits on pad <math>0</math>, a morsel of food sits on pad <math>10</math>, and predators sit on pads <math>3</math> and <math>6</math>. At each unit of time the frog jumps either to the next higher numbered pad or to the pad after that, each with probability <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>, independently from previous jumps. What is the probability that Fiona skips over pads <math>3</math> and <math>6</math> and lands on pad <math>10</math>?
+
There are lily pads in a row numbered <math>0</math> to <math>11</math>, in that order. There are predators on lily pads <math>3</math> and <math>6</math>, and a morsel of food on lily pad <math>10</math>. Fiona the frog starts on pad <math>0</math>, and from any given lily pad, has a <math>\frac{1}{2}</math> chance to hop to the next pad, and an equal chance to jump <math>2</math> pads. What is the probability that Fiona reaches pad <math>10</math> without landing on either pad <math>3</math> or pad <math>6</math>?
  
<math>\textbf{(A) }\frac{15}{256}\qquad\textbf{(B) }\frac{1}{16}\qquad\textbf{(C) }\frac{15}{128}\qquad\textbf{(D) }\frac{1}{8}\qquad\textbf{(E) }\frac{1}{4}</math>
+
<math>\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256} \qquad \textbf{(B) } \frac{1}{16} \qquad \textbf{(C) } \frac{15}{128}\qquad \textbf{(D) } \frac{1}{8} \qquad \textbf{(E) } \frac14</math>
  
 
==Solution 1==
 
==Solution 1==
First, notice that Fiona, if she jumps over the predator on pad <math>3</math>, must land on pad <math>4</math>. Similarly, she must land on <math>7</math> if she makes it past <math>6</math>. Thus, we can split it into <math>3</math> smaller problems counting the probability Fiona skips <math>3</math>, Fiona skips <math>6</math> (starting at <math>4</math>) and <math>\textit{doesn't}</math> skip <math>10</math> (starting at <math>7</math>). Incidentally, the last one is equivalent to the first one minus <math>1</math>.
+
Firstly, notice that if Fiona jumps over the predator on pad <math>3</math>, she must land on pad <math>4</math>. Similarly, she must land on <math>7</math> if she makes it past <math>6</math>. Thus, we can split the problem into <math>3</math> smaller sub-problems, separately finding the probability Fiona skips <math>3</math>, the probability she skips <math>6</math> (starting at <math>4</math>) and the probability she ''doesn't'' skip <math>10</math> (starting at <math>7</math>). Notice that by symmetry, the last of these three sub-problems is the complement of the first sub-problem, so the probability will be <math>1 - \text{the probability obtained in the first sub-problem}</math>.
  
Let's call the larger jump a <math>2</math>-jump, and the smaller a <math>1</math>-jump.  
+
In the analysis below, we call the larger jump a <math>2</math>-jump, and the smaller a <math>1</math>-jump.  
  
For the first mini-problem, let's see our options. Fiona can either go <math>1, 1, 2</math> (probability of <math>\frac{1}{8}</math>), or she can go <math>2, 2</math> (probability of <math>\frac{1}{4}</math>). These are the only two options, so they together make the answer <math>\frac{3}{8}</math>. We now also know the answer to the last mini-problem (<math>\frac{5}{8}</math>).
+
For the first sub-problem, consider Fiona's options. She can either go <math>1</math>-jump, <math>1</math>-jump, <math>2</math>-jump, with probability <math>\frac{1}{8}</math>, or she can go <math>2</math>-jump, <math>2</math>-jump, with probability <math>\frac{1}{4}</math>. These are the only two options, so they together make the answer <math>\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{3}{8}</math>. We now also know the answer to the last sub-problem is <math>1-\frac{3}{8}=\frac{5}{8}</math>.
  
For the second mini-problem, Fiona <math>\textit{must}</math> go <math>1, 2</math> (probability of <math>\frac{1}{4}</math>). Any other option results in her death to a predator.
+
For the second sub-problem, Fiona ''must'' go <math>1</math>-jump, <math>2</math>-jump, with probability <math>\frac{1}{4}</math>, since any other option would result in her death to a predator.
  
Thus, the final answer is <math>\frac{3}{8} \cdot \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{5}{8} = \frac{15}{256} = \boxed{\textbf{(A) }\frac{15}{256}}</math>.
+
Thus, since the three sub-problems are independent, the final answer is <math>\frac{3}{8} \cdot \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{5}{8} = \boxed{\textbf{(A) }\frac{15}{256}}</math>.
  
 
==Solution 2==
 
==Solution 2==
  
Consider – independently – every spot that the frog could attain.
+
Observe that since Fiona can only jump at most <math>2</math> places per move, and still wishes to avoid pads <math>3</math> and <math>6</math>, she must also land on numbers <math>2</math>, <math>4</math>, <math>5</math>, and <math>7</math>.
  
Given that it can only jump at most <math>2</math> places per move, and still wishes to avoid pads <math>3</math> and <math>6</math>, it must also land on numbers <math>2</math>, <math>4</math>, <math>5</math>, and <math>7</math>.
+
There are two ways to reach lily pad <math>2</math>, namely <math>1</math>-jump, <math>1</math>-jump, with probability <math>\frac{1}{4}</math>, or just a <math>2</math>-jump, with probability <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>. The total is thus <math>\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{4}</math>. Fiona must now make a <math>2</math>-jump to lily pad <math>4</math>, again with probability <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>, giving <math>\frac{3}{4} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8}</math>.
  
There are two ways to get to that point – one would be <math>(1,2)</math> on the first move, and the other is just <math>(2)</math>. The total sum is then <math>\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{4}</math>, which put into our first column and move on. The frog must subsequently go to space <math>4</math>, again with probability <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>. Thus, be sure to multiply by <math>\frac{1}{2}</math> again, yielding the result of <math>\frac{3}{8}</math>.
+
Similarly, Fiona must now make a <math>1</math>-jump to reach lily pad <math>5</math>, again with probability <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>, giving <math>\frac{3}{8} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{16}</math>. Then she must make a <math>2</math>-jump to reach lily pad <math>7</math>, with probability <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>, yielding <math>\frac{3}{16} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{32}</math>.
  
Similarly, multiply your product by <math>\frac{1}{2}</math> once more, to arrive at spot <math>5</math>: <math>\frac{3}{8} \times {1}{2} = \frac{3}{16}</math>. For number <math>7</math>, take another <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>, giving us <math>\frac{3}{16} \times \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{32}</math>.
+
Finally, to reach lily pad <math>10</math>, Fiona has a few options - she can make <math>3</math> consecutive <math>1</math>-jumps, with probability <math>\frac{1}{8}</math>, or <math>1</math>-jump, <math>2</math>-jump, with probability <math>\frac{1}{4}</math>, or <math>2</math>-jump, <math>1</math>-jump, again with probability <math>\frac{1}{4}</math>. The final answer is thus <math>\frac{3}{32} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}\right) = \frac{3}{32} \cdot \frac{5}{8} = \boxed{\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256}}</math>.
  
Next, we must look at a number of options. For a fuller picture, it would be best to break down the choices. The only possibilities here are <math>(8,9,10)</math>, <math>(8,10)</math>, and <math>(9,10)</math>, as the path straight to point <math>10</math> is not available. That leaves us with a partial count of <math>\frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4} = frac{5}{8}</math>. Multiply, to find that <math>\frac{3}{32} \times \frac{5}{8} = \boxed{\textbf{(A)} \frac{15}{256}}</math>. <math>\square</math>
+
==Solution 3 (recursion)==
  
--anna0kear.
+
Let <math>p_n</math> be the probability of landing on lily pad <math>n</math>. Observe that if there are no restrictions, we would have
 
 
==Solution 3 (Recursion)==
 
 
 
Let <math>p_n</math> be the probability of landing on lily pad <math>n</math>. We immediately notice that, if there are no restrictions:
 
 
<cmath>p_n = \frac{1}{2} \cdot p_{n-1} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot p_{n-2}</cmath>
 
<cmath>p_n = \frac{1}{2} \cdot p_{n-1} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot p_{n-2}</cmath>
  
This is because, given that we are at lily pad <math>n-2</math>, there is a 50% chance that we will go to lily pad <math>n</math>, and the same applies for lily pad <math>n-1</math>. We will now compute the values of <math>p_n</math> recursively, but we will skip over <math>3</math> and <math>6</math>. That is, we will not consider any jumps from lily pads 3 or 6 when considering the probabilities. We obtain the following chart:
+
This is because, given that Fiona is at lily pad <math>n-2</math>, there is a <math>\frac{1}{2}</math> probability that she will make a <math>2</math>-jump to reach lily pad <math>n</math>, and the same applies for a <math>1</math>-jump to reach lily pad <math>n-1</math>. We will now compute the values of <math>p_n</math> recursively, but we will skip over <math>3</math> and <math>6</math>. That is, we will not consider any jumps from lily pads <math>3</math> or <math>6</math> when considering the probabilities. We obtain the following chart, where an X represents an unused/uncomputed value:
  
 
<asy>
 
<asy>
  
 
unitsize(40);
 
unitsize(40);
string[] vals = {"1", "$1/2$", "$3/4$", "$X$", "$3/8$", "$3/26$", "$X$", "$3/32$", "$3/64$", "$9/128$", "$15/256$", "$X$"};
+
string[] vals = {"1", "$1/2$", "$3/4$", "X", "$3/8$", "$3/16$", "X", "$3/32$", "$3/64$", "$9/128$", "$15/256$", "X"};
 
for(int i =0; i<= 11; ++i) {
 
for(int i =0; i<= 11; ++i) {
 
draw((i,0)--(i+1,0)--(i+1,1)--(i,1)--cycle);
 
draw((i,0)--(i+1,0)--(i+1,1)--(i,1)--cycle);
Line 47: Line 43:
 
</asy>
 
</asy>
  
As we can see, the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256}}</math>
+
Hence the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256}}</math>.
 +
 
 +
Note: If we let <math>p_n</math> be the probability of surviving if the frog is on lily pad <math>n</math>, using <math>p_{10}</math> = 1, we can solve backwards and obtain the following chart:
 +
 
 +
<asy>
 +
 
 +
unitsize(40);
 +
string[] vals = {"$15/256$", "$5/128$", "$5/64$", "X", "$5/32$", "$5/16$", "X", "$5/8$", "$3/4$", "$1/2$", "1", "X"};
 +
for(int i =0; i<= 11; ++i) {
 +
draw((i,0)--(i+1,0)--(i+1,1)--(i,1)--cycle);
 +
label((string) (11-i), (i+0.5,0), S);
 +
label(vals[(11-i)], (i+0.5, 0.5));
 +
}
 +
</asy>
 +
 
 +
==Solution 4 (simple casework bash)==
 +
This is equivalent to finding the probability for each of the valid ways of tiling a <math>1</math>-by-<math>11</math> rectangular grid (with one end being lilypad <math>0</math> and the other being lilypad <math>11</math>) with tiles of size <math>1 \cdot 1</math> and <math>1 \cdot 2</math> that satisfies the conditions mentioned in the problem. Obviously, for Fiona to skip pads <math>3</math> and <math>6</math>, a <math>1 \cdot 2</math> tile must be placed with one end at lilypad <math>2</math> and the other at lilypad <math>4</math>, and another <math>1 \cdot 2</math> must be placed with one end at lilypad <math>5</math> and the other at lilypad <math>7</math>. Thus, since only a <math>1 \cdot 1</math> tile can fit between the two aforementioned <math>1 \cdot 2</math> tiles, we will place it there. Now, we can solve this problem with simple casework.
 +
 
 +
Case 1: Two <math>1 \cdot 1</math> tiles fill the space between lilypads <math>0</math> and <math>2</math>.
 +
 
 +
There are two ways to permute a placement of a <math>1 \cdot 1</math> tile and a <math>1 \cdot 2</math> tile between lilypads <math>7</math> and <math>10</math>, so our probability for this sub-case is <math>\frac{2}{2^7} = \frac{1}{64}</math>. In the other subcase where the space between lilypads <math>7</math> and <math>10</math> is completely filled with <math>1 \cdot 1</math> tiles, there is trivially only one tiling, thus the probability for this sub-case is <math>\frac{1}{2^8} = \frac{1}{256}.</math> The total probability for this case is <math>\frac{1}{64} + \frac{1}{256} = \frac{5}{256}.</math>
 +
 
 +
Case 2: A single <math>1 \cdot 2</math> tile fills the space between lilypads <math>0</math> and <math>2</math>.
 +
 
 +
Note that the combined probability for this case will be double that of Case <math>1</math>, since a single <math>1 \cdot 2</math> tile takes up one less tile than two <math>1 \cdot 1</math> tiles. Thus, the probability for this case is <math>2 \cdot \frac{5}{256} = \frac{10}{256}.</math>
 +
 
 +
Summing our cases up, we obtain <math>\boxed{\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256}}</math>.
  
(Solution by vedadehhc)
+
-fidgetboss_4000
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
{{AMC12 box|year=2019|ab=B|num-b=15|num-a=17}}
 
{{AMC12 box|year=2019|ab=B|num-b=15|num-a=17}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}

Revision as of 13:12, 13 August 2021

Problem

There are lily pads in a row numbered $0$ to $11$, in that order. There are predators on lily pads $3$ and $6$, and a morsel of food on lily pad $10$. Fiona the frog starts on pad $0$, and from any given lily pad, has a $\frac{1}{2}$ chance to hop to the next pad, and an equal chance to jump $2$ pads. What is the probability that Fiona reaches pad $10$ without landing on either pad $3$ or pad $6$?

$\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256} \qquad \textbf{(B) } \frac{1}{16} \qquad \textbf{(C) } \frac{15}{128}\qquad \textbf{(D) } \frac{1}{8} \qquad \textbf{(E) } \frac14$

Solution 1

Firstly, notice that if Fiona jumps over the predator on pad $3$, she must land on pad $4$. Similarly, she must land on $7$ if she makes it past $6$. Thus, we can split the problem into $3$ smaller sub-problems, separately finding the probability Fiona skips $3$, the probability she skips $6$ (starting at $4$) and the probability she doesn't skip $10$ (starting at $7$). Notice that by symmetry, the last of these three sub-problems is the complement of the first sub-problem, so the probability will be $1 - \text{the probability obtained in the first sub-problem}$.

In the analysis below, we call the larger jump a $2$-jump, and the smaller a $1$-jump.

For the first sub-problem, consider Fiona's options. She can either go $1$-jump, $1$-jump, $2$-jump, with probability $\frac{1}{8}$, or she can go $2$-jump, $2$-jump, with probability $\frac{1}{4}$. These are the only two options, so they together make the answer $\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{3}{8}$. We now also know the answer to the last sub-problem is $1-\frac{3}{8}=\frac{5}{8}$.

For the second sub-problem, Fiona must go $1$-jump, $2$-jump, with probability $\frac{1}{4}$, since any other option would result in her death to a predator.

Thus, since the three sub-problems are independent, the final answer is $\frac{3}{8} \cdot \frac{1}{4} \cdot \frac{5}{8} = \boxed{\textbf{(A) }\frac{15}{256}}$.

Solution 2

Observe that since Fiona can only jump at most $2$ places per move, and still wishes to avoid pads $3$ and $6$, she must also land on numbers $2$, $4$, $5$, and $7$.

There are two ways to reach lily pad $2$, namely $1$-jump, $1$-jump, with probability $\frac{1}{4}$, or just a $2$-jump, with probability $\frac{1}{2}$. The total is thus $\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{4}$. Fiona must now make a $2$-jump to lily pad $4$, again with probability $\frac{1}{2}$, giving $\frac{3}{4} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{8}$.

Similarly, Fiona must now make a $1$-jump to reach lily pad $5$, again with probability $\frac{1}{2}$, giving $\frac{3}{8} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{16}$. Then she must make a $2$-jump to reach lily pad $7$, with probability $\frac{1}{2}$, yielding $\frac{3}{16} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{3}{32}$.

Finally, to reach lily pad $10$, Fiona has a few options - she can make $3$ consecutive $1$-jumps, with probability $\frac{1}{8}$, or $1$-jump, $2$-jump, with probability $\frac{1}{4}$, or $2$-jump, $1$-jump, again with probability $\frac{1}{4}$. The final answer is thus $\frac{3}{32} \cdot \left(\frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}\right) = \frac{3}{32} \cdot \frac{5}{8} = \boxed{\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256}}$.

Solution 3 (recursion)

Let $p_n$ be the probability of landing on lily pad $n$. Observe that if there are no restrictions, we would have \[p_n = \frac{1}{2} \cdot p_{n-1} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot p_{n-2}\]

This is because, given that Fiona is at lily pad $n-2$, there is a $\frac{1}{2}$ probability that she will make a $2$-jump to reach lily pad $n$, and the same applies for a $1$-jump to reach lily pad $n-1$. We will now compute the values of $p_n$ recursively, but we will skip over $3$ and $6$. That is, we will not consider any jumps from lily pads $3$ or $6$ when considering the probabilities. We obtain the following chart, where an X represents an unused/uncomputed value:

[asy]  unitsize(40); string[] vals = {"1", "$1/2$", "$3/4$", "X", "$3/8$", "$3/16$", "X", "$3/32$", "$3/64$", "$9/128$", "$15/256$", "X"}; for(int i =0; i<= 11; ++i) { draw((i,0)--(i+1,0)--(i+1,1)--(i,1)--cycle); label((string) i, (i+0.5,0), S); label(vals[i], (i+0.5, 0.5)); } [/asy]

Hence the answer is $\boxed{\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256}}$.

Note: If we let $p_n$ be the probability of surviving if the frog is on lily pad $n$, using $p_{10}$ = 1, we can solve backwards and obtain the following chart:

[asy]  unitsize(40); string[] vals = {"$15/256$", "$5/128$", "$5/64$", "X", "$5/32$", "$5/16$", "X", "$5/8$", "$3/4$", "$1/2$", "1", "X"}; for(int i =0; i<= 11; ++i) { draw((i,0)--(i+1,0)--(i+1,1)--(i,1)--cycle); label((string) (11-i), (i+0.5,0), S); label(vals[(11-i)], (i+0.5, 0.5)); } [/asy]

Solution 4 (simple casework bash)

This is equivalent to finding the probability for each of the valid ways of tiling a $1$-by-$11$ rectangular grid (with one end being lilypad $0$ and the other being lilypad $11$) with tiles of size $1 \cdot 1$ and $1 \cdot 2$ that satisfies the conditions mentioned in the problem. Obviously, for Fiona to skip pads $3$ and $6$, a $1 \cdot 2$ tile must be placed with one end at lilypad $2$ and the other at lilypad $4$, and another $1 \cdot 2$ must be placed with one end at lilypad $5$ and the other at lilypad $7$. Thus, since only a $1 \cdot 1$ tile can fit between the two aforementioned $1 \cdot 2$ tiles, we will place it there. Now, we can solve this problem with simple casework.

Case 1: Two $1 \cdot 1$ tiles fill the space between lilypads $0$ and $2$.

There are two ways to permute a placement of a $1 \cdot 1$ tile and a $1 \cdot 2$ tile between lilypads $7$ and $10$, so our probability for this sub-case is $\frac{2}{2^7} = \frac{1}{64}$. In the other subcase where the space between lilypads $7$ and $10$ is completely filled with $1 \cdot 1$ tiles, there is trivially only one tiling, thus the probability for this sub-case is $\frac{1}{2^8} = \frac{1}{256}.$ The total probability for this case is $\frac{1}{64} + \frac{1}{256} = \frac{5}{256}.$

Case 2: A single $1 \cdot 2$ tile fills the space between lilypads $0$ and $2$.

Note that the combined probability for this case will be double that of Case $1$, since a single $1 \cdot 2$ tile takes up one less tile than two $1 \cdot 1$ tiles. Thus, the probability for this case is $2 \cdot \frac{5}{256} = \frac{10}{256}.$

Summing our cases up, we obtain $\boxed{\textbf{(A) } \frac{15}{256}}$.

-fidgetboss_4000

See Also

2019 AMC 12B (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 15
Followed by
Problem 17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png