# Ball-and-urn

The **ball-and-urn** technique, also known as **stars-and-bars**, **sticks-and-stones**, or **dots-and-dividers**, is a commonly used technique in combinatorics.

It is used to solve problems of the form: how many ways can one distribute indistinguishable objects into distinguishable bins? We can imagine this as finding the number of ways to drop balls into urns, or equivalently to arrange balls and dividers. For example, represent the ways to put objects in bins. The number of ways to do such is , or .

## Reasoning (One of Two)

Arranging *'s and |'s is the same as saying there are positions: and you want to fill of them with *'s and the rest of them with |'s. Thus you are choosing positions out of total positions, resulting in a total of ways.

## Reasoning (Two of Two)

If you could only put one ball in each urn, then there would be possibilities; the problem is that you can repeat urns, so this does not work. You can, however, reframe the problem as so: imagine that you have the urns (numbered 1 through ) and then you also have urns labeled "repeat 1st", "repeat 2nd", ..., and "repeat -th". After the balls are in urns you can imagine that any balls in the "repeat" urns are moved on top of the correct balls in the first urns, moving from left to right. There is a one-to-one correspondence between the non-repeating arrangements in these new urns and the repeats-allowed arrangements in the original urns.

For a simple example, consider balls and urns. The one to one correspondence between several of the possibilities and the "repeated urns" version is shown. Since there are 4 balls, these examples will have three possible "repeat" urns. For simplicity, I am listing the numbers of the urns with balls in them, so "1,1,2,4" means balls in urn in urn and in urn The same is true for the "repeat" urns options but I use the notation etc.

- (no repeats).
- .
- , .
- , .

Since the re-framed version of the problem has urns, and balls that can each only go in one urn, the number of possible scenarios is simply Note: Due to the principle that , we can say that .