Difference between revisions of "Combinatorial identity"

(categorize)
(Vandermonde's Identity)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
==Vandermonde's Identity==
 
==Vandermonde's Identity==
 +
Vandermonde's Identity states that <math>\sum_{k=0}^r\binom mk\binom n{r-k}=\binom{m+n}r</math>, which can be proven combinatorially by noting that any combination of <math>r</math> objects from a group of <math>m+n</math> objects must have some <math>0\le k\le r</math> objects from group <math>m</math> and the remaining from group <math>n</math>.
  
 
== Examples ==
 
== Examples ==

Revision as of 21:40, 10 February 2009

Hockey-Stick Identity

For $n,r\in\mathbb{N}, n>r,\sum^n_{i=r}{i\choose r}={n+1\choose r+1}$.

This identity is known as the hockey-stick identity because, on Pascal's triangle, when the addends represented in the summation and the sum itself are highlighted, a hockey-stick shape is revealed.


An image is supposed to go here. You can help us out by creating one and editing it in. Thanks.


Proof

This identity can be proven by induction on $n$.

Base case Let $n=r$.

$\sum^n_{i=r}{i\choose r}=\sum^r_{i=r}{i\choose r}={r\choose r}=1={r+1\choose r+1}$.

Inductive step Suppose, for some $k\in\mathbb{N}, k>r$, $\sum^k_{i=r}{i\choose r}={k+1\choose r+1}$. Then $\sum^{k+1}_{i=r}{i\choose r}=\left(\sum^k_{i=r}{i\choose r}\right)+{k+1\choose r}={k+1\choose r+1}+{k+1\choose r}={k+2\choose r+1}$.

It can also be proven algebraicly with pascal's identity

${n \choose k}={n-1\choose k-1}+{n-1\choose k}$

Look at ${r \choose r}+{r+1 \choose r} +{r+2 \choose r}...+{r+a \choose r}$ It can be rewritten as ${r+1 \choose r+1}+{r+1 \choose r} +{r+2 \choose r}...+{r+a \choose r}$ Using pascals identity, we get ${r+2 \choose r+1}+{r+2 \choose r}+...+{r+a \choose r}$ We can continuously apply pascals identity until we get to ${r+a \choose r-1}+{r+a \choose r}={r+a+1 \choose r+1}$

Vandermonde's Identity

Vandermonde's Identity states that $\sum_{k=0}^r\binom mk\binom n{r-k}=\binom{m+n}r$, which can be proven combinatorially by noting that any combination of $r$ objects from a group of $m+n$ objects must have some $0\le k\le r$ objects from group $m$ and the remaining from group $n$.

Examples

See also