# Difference between revisions of "Distinguishability"

m |
m |
||

Line 30: | Line 30: | ||

One common problem that can be solved by this is finding the number of solutions to <math>a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_k = n</math>, where <math>a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n\ge0</math>, which has <math>\binom{n + k - 1}{k - 1}</math> solutions. | One common problem that can be solved by this is finding the number of solutions to <math>a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_k = n</math>, where <math>a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n\ge0</math>, which has <math>\binom{n + k - 1}{k - 1}</math> solutions. | ||

− | |||

− |

## Revision as of 22:46, 16 September 2009

When distributing things to other things, one has to consider the **distinguishability** of the objects (i.e. if they're distinguishable or not). If the things are distinguishable, one also has to consider if duplicates are allowed (i.e. if we can repeat). For these problems, it is best to think about it first.

## Contents

- 1 Distinguishable to distinguishable, with duplicates
- 2 Distinguishable to distinguishable, without duplicates
- 3 Distinguishable to indistinguishable, with duplicates
- 4 Distinguishable to indistinguishable, without duplicates
- 5 Indistinguishable to indistinguishable
- 6 Indistinguishable to distinguishable (Balls and Urns)

## Distinguishable to distinguishable, with duplicates

For each of the things, there are choices, for a total of ways.

## Distinguishable to distinguishable, without duplicates

For each of the things, there are choices, for a total of ways.

## Distinguishable to indistinguishable, with duplicates

This is "reverse" Balls and Urns, or essentially distributing indistinguishable objects to distinguishable objects. Refer to 6; this case has ways (notice the difference between this and 6). This works because in every distribution, since the number of indistinguishable objects is fixed, it only matters how many times each of the distinguishable objects were used. If we let the number of times each of the distinguishable objects were used be nonnegative , then we must have , which, as seen in 6, has solutions.

## Distinguishable to indistinguishable, without duplicates

This is probably the most tedious cases, as it involves the most casework. One way is to first find all the partitions (refer to 5) of with addends, (i.e. all solutions to in which the addends are indistinguishable). Then, for each partition, separately calculate the number of ways, and finally, add these results together.

For example, if , then our partitions are: --this case has way. --we choose one of to be the "", so there are ways. --we choose three objects to be the "'s" (the rest are determined after this), so there are ways for this. --again, we choose three objects to be the "'s" (the rest are determined after this), so there are ways for this. --first, we choose one object to be the "", which has ways. Then, we can choose any two of the remaining four to be one of the "'s", and there are ways for this. However, we must divide this by , since the two "'s" are interchangeable, and the total for this case is .

Adding up, we get ways.

All of these problems are similar to this one in that you divide them up into smaller counting problems.

## Indistinguishable to indistinguishable

This is part of the partition problem. Imagine that you are finding the number of solutions to , where are indistinguishable.

This can be done with casework; the method is best explained with an example: say that . Our partitions are then , so there are partitions.

## Indistinguishable to distinguishable (Balls and Urns)

This is "Balls and Urns". In general, if one has indistinguishable objects that one wants to distribute to distinguishable objects, then there are ways to do so.

Imagine that there are dividers, denoted by , and objects, denoted by , so we have and . Then, label the regions formed by the dividers, so we get (since there are dividers) and our objects . We can now see that there are distinct regions (corresponding to the distinguishable objects) in which we can place our identical objects (corresponding to the indistinguishable objects that one is distributing), which is analogous to the original problem. Finally, there are arrangements of the stars and the by basic permutations with repeated items. **Note:** the number of stars that appears in each of the regions represents the number of indistinguishable objects (the stars) given to a particular distinguishable object (of the dividers). For example, if we're distributing stars to kids, then one arrangement is corresponding to star to the first kid, to the second, to the third, to the fourth, and to the fifth.

One common problem that can be solved by this is finding the number of solutions to , where , which has solutions.