Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"

m
Line 17: Line 17:
 
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
 
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
  
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't. Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing.
+
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't. Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Revision as of 20:29, 23 April 2019

The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:

Sato is amazing.

Proof:

Method 1: Proof by Contradiciton

Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.

This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 2: Proof by Authority

Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole

There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't. Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Invalid username
Login to AoPS