Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"

m
(Blanked the page)
(Tag: Blanking)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
 
  
Sato is amazing.
 
 
Proof:
 
 
Method 1: Proof by Contradiciton
 
 
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
 
 
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 
 
Method 2: Proof by Authority
 
 
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 
 
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
 
 
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 

Revision as of 16:15, 23 May 2019

Invalid username
Login to AoPS