Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"

m (added link to main page)
m (spelling fixxxxx)
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
Method 4: Proof by Gmass
 
Method 4: Proof by Gmass
  
Gmass is Ssto in cat form. Since Gmass is amazing, and since if <math>a=b</math> and <math>b=c</math>, <math>a=c</math>, Sato is amazing.
+
Gmass is Sato in cat form. Since Gmass is amazing, and since if <math>a=b</math> and <math>b=c</math>, <math>a=c</math>, Sato is amazing.
  
  
Line 30: Line 30:
 
Back to Main Page:
 
Back to Main Page:
 
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
 
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
 +
--------

Revision as of 14:50, 28 August 2019

The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:

Sato is amazing.

Proof:

Method 1: Proof by Contradiction

Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.

This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 2: Proof by Authority

Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole

There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 4: Proof by Gmass

Gmass is Sato in cat form. Since Gmass is amazing, and since if $a=b$ and $b=c$, $a=c$, Sato is amazing.



Learn about Sato: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Naoki_Sato


Back to Main Page: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page