Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"

(20 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{delete|As said [https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c65h1815452_spam_page here], this is a spam page. Read that page to know why.}}
 +
 
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
 
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
  
[[Naoki Sato]] is amazing.  
+
Sato is amazing.
 +
 
 +
Proof:
 +
 
 +
Method 1: Proof by Contradiction
 +
 
 +
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
 +
 
 +
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 +
 
 +
Method 2: Proof by Authority
 +
 
 +
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 +
 
 +
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
 +
 
 +
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
  
Proof:
+
Method 4: Proof by Gmass
  
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.  
+
Gmass is Sato in cat form. Since Gmass is amazing, and since if <math>a=b</math> and <math>b=c</math>, <math>a=c</math>, Sato is amazing.
  
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing.
 
  
'''QED'''
+
------
 +
Learn about Sato:
 +
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Naoki_Sato
 +
-------
 +
Back to Main Page:
 +
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
 +
--------

Revision as of 06:47, 15 September 2020

This article has been proposed for deletion. The reason given is: As said here, this is a spam page. Read that page to know why..

Sysops: Before deleting this article, please check the article discussion pages and history.

The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:

Sato is amazing.

Proof:

Method 1: Proof by Contradiction

Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.

This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 2: Proof by Authority

Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole

There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 4: Proof by Gmass

Gmass is Sato in cat form. Since Gmass is amazing, and since if $a=b$ and $b=c$, $a=c$, Sato is amazing.



Learn about Sato: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Naoki_Sato


Back to Main Page: https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page