Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"

(Sato is amazing)
 
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
 
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
  
Naoki Sato is amazing.  
+
Sato is amazing.
  
Proof:  
+
Proof:
  
Assume, for contraction, that Sato is not amazing.
+
Method 1: Proof by Contradiciton
  
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing.  
+
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
  
'''QED'''
+
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 +
 
 +
Method 2: Proof by Authority
 +
 
 +
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 +
 
 +
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
 +
 
 +
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Latest revision as of 16:34, 12 May 2021

The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:

Sato is amazing.

Proof:

Method 1: Proof by Contradiciton

Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.

This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 2: Proof by Authority

Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole

There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Invalid username
Login to AoPS