Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"

m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{delete|As said [https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c65h1815452_spam_page here], this is a spam page. Read that page to know why.}}
 
 
 
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
 
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
  
Sato is amazing.
+
'''Sato is amazing.'''
  
 
Proof:
 
Proof:
Line 20: Line 18:
  
 
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
 
Method 4: Proof by Gmass
 
 
Gmass is Sato in cat form. Since Gmass is amazing, and since if <math>a=b</math> and <math>b=c</math>, <math>a=c</math>, Sato is amazing.
 
 
 
------
 
Learn about Sato:
 
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Naoki_Sato
 
-------
 
Back to Main Page:
 
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
 
--------
 

Latest revision as of 16:50, 28 January 2024

The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:

Sato is amazing.

Proof:

Method 1: Proof by Contradiction

Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.

This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 2: Proof by Authority

Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)

Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole

There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't (in this case, Sato goes in the unamazing pigeonhole). Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. (Proved)