Difference between revisions of "Fundamental Theorem of Sato"
m |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved) | Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't. Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing. | ||
Revision as of 20:28, 23 April 2019
The Fundamental Theorem of Sato states the following:
Sato is amazing.
Proof:
Method 1: Proof by Contradiciton
Assume, for contradiction, that Sato is not amazing.
This is absurd. Therefore, Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 2: Proof by Authority
Whatever AoPS says is correct, and AoPS says that Mr. Sato is amazing. Thus, Mr. Sato is amazing. (Proved)
Method 3: Proof by Pigeonhole
There is only one Sato. By Pigeonhole, either Sato is amazing or he isn't. Fortunately, Sato cannot fit in a pigeonhole; hence, Sato is amazing.
