Difference between revisions of "Slalom conjuncture"

(Created page with "<h1>The Slalom Conjuncture</h1> <h2>As discovered by Elbertpark</h2> <h3>Written by Elbertpark</h3> <h4>Idea made by Elbertpark...</h4> <h5>and so on</h5> <h1>What IS the Sla...")
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
<h1>What IS the Slalom Conjuncture?</h1>
 
<h1>What IS the Slalom Conjuncture?</h1>
<p>The Slalom Conjuncture was discovered during a math assignment. It states that if there is an odd square <math>n^2</math>, then this square has a maximum of <math>n^2 - 2n</math> factors.</p>
+
<p>The Slalom Conjuncture was discovered during a math assignment. It states that if there is an odd square <math>n^2</math>, then this square has a maximum of <math>n^2 - 2n</math> factors starting from 3.</p>
  
 
Listed is a table of squares and factors up to 11.
 
Listed is a table of squares and factors up to 11.
Line 61: Line 61:
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
Note that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors.
+
Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors.
 
<h1>Proof</h1>
 
<h1>Proof</h1>
 
Unfortunately, only Doggo and Gmaas have the logical, solid proof to this conjuncture. That is why this is a conjuncture.
 
Unfortunately, only Doggo and Gmaas have the logical, solid proof to this conjuncture. That is why this is a conjuncture.
 
<h2>Broken proof</h2>
 
<h2>Broken proof</h2>
 
For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet.
 
For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet.
 +
 +
<code> This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.<code>

Revision as of 01:38, 16 June 2021

The Slalom Conjuncture

As discovered by Elbertpark

Written by Elbertpark

Idea made by Elbertpark...

and so on

What IS the Slalom Conjuncture?

The Slalom Conjuncture was discovered during a math assignment. It states that if there is an odd square $n^2$, then this square has a maximum of $n^2 - 2n$ factors starting from 3.

Listed is a table of squares and factors up to 11.

Number $n^2$ # of factors
1 1 1
3 9 3
5 25 3
7 49 3
9 81 5
11 121 3
... ... ...
81 6561 9
4001 16008001 3

Notice that most of the squares, even 4001, have only 3 factors.

Proof

Unfortunately, only Doggo and Gmaas have the logical, solid proof to this conjuncture. That is why this is a conjuncture.

Broken proof

For now we can agree that because soon the squares will be growing exponentially, this conjuncture cannot be wrong... yet.

This article is a stub. Help us by expanding it.