Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010 AMC 12B Problems/Problem 25"
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Because the AMC has a short time limit, yes, you "just have to cross our fingers and guess". | Because the AMC has a short time limit, yes, you "just have to cross our fingers and guess". | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looking at the results of the Mathematica function mentioned above, you would likely want to guess both <math>2</math> and <math>67</math>, as the function appears to increase then decrease. That's probably the best way to have a chance of solving the problem quickly, and hope that they didn't throw in an outlier like 11. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --- donutvan | ||
Latest revision as of 11:54, 29 August 2021
How do we know that 67 will yield the smallest result of 77?
I created a Mathematica function to check all primes <= 67, and yes indeed 67 gave the smallest result of 77 but 2 gives a problematically close 78. And the trend is not always decreasing:
x = 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, 47, 53, 59, 61, 67 f(x) = 78, 140, 162, 189, 164, 177, 162, 162, 149, 130, 128, 113, 108, 105, 99, 92, 83, 82, 77
So if the target problem was not 
but 
, then 13 as the largest prime in 2001=7*11*13 will give an incorrect answer of 
. The correct answer will be 
.
Do we just have to cross our fingers and guess that it is f(67)=77 is indeed the smallest?
--- buhiroshi0205
Because the AMC has a short time limit, yes, you "just have to cross our fingers and guess".
Looking at the results of the Mathematica function mentioned above, you would likely want to guess both 
and 
, as the function appears to increase then decrease. That's probably the best way to have a chance of solving the problem quickly, and hope that they didn't throw in an outlier like 11.
--- donutvan
