Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010 USAJMO Problems/Problem 1"
(Created page with 'Um, I already made a page for this problem her: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki/index.php/USAJMO_2010_Problem_1 Instead of using terms like equivalence relation, which we…') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Um, I already made a page for this problem | + | Um, I already made a page for this problem here: |
| + | [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki/index.php/USAJMO_2010_Problem_1] | ||
| + | Instead of using terms like equivalence relation, which we all know, just say "this operation preserves blah for all perfect squares." It's much easier to follow and more enjoyable to read. Personally, I like my solution more (well, it is mine) but it's essentially the same. What do you think? Is this better or worse? We could have a "sophisticated language with a lot of formulas one" - this one- and a second solution, mine. [[User:Yugrey|Yugrey]] 00:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:30, 11 May 2010
Um, I already made a page for this problem here: [1]
Instead of using terms like equivalence relation, which we all know, just say "this operation preserves blah for all perfect squares." It's much easier to follow and more enjoyable to read. Personally, I like my solution more (well, it is mine) but it's essentially the same. What do you think? Is this better or worse? We could have a "sophisticated language with a lot of formulas one" - this one- and a second solution, mine. Yugrey 00:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
