Difference between revisions of "Talk:Combinatorial identity"

Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
When in doubt, put them in both places. If we feel that they don't belong in one place, we can delete them, and then they won't be entirely gone. (Not that they would anyway, but most of us probably don't want to dig through page histories any more than necessary.) --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 00:04, 25 June 2006 (EDT)
 
When in doubt, put them in both places. If we feel that they don't belong in one place, we can delete them, and then they won't be entirely gone. (Not that they would anyway, but most of us probably don't want to dig through page histories any more than necessary.) --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 00:04, 25 June 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
I suggest deleting this article, and adding a redirect to [[Pascal's Triangle]].  What do you guys think? --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Sean]] 13:04, 27 June 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:04, 27 June 2006

Wait is it Combinatorial or Combinatorical? --Chess64 16:52, 19 June 2006 (EDT)

Combinatorial --ComplexZeta 00:04, 25 June 2006 (EDT)

This and Pascal's Triangle

I'm not quite sure how to work this page and Pascal's Triangle; I've got a couple of these identites expanded in detail on that page, and they really belong here as well. How much overlap between these pages do we want? --Dschafer 23:36, 24 June 2006 (EDT)

When in doubt, put them in both places. If we feel that they don't belong in one place, we can delete them, and then they won't be entirely gone. (Not that they would anyway, but most of us probably don't want to dig through page histories any more than necessary.) --ComplexZeta 00:04, 25 June 2006 (EDT)

I suggest deleting this article, and adding a redirect to Pascal's Triangle. What do you guys think? --Sean 13:04, 27 June 2006 (EDT)

Invalid username
Login to AoPS