Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mathematicial notation"

m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I copied this from the AoPS Formulary, and it needs to be converted to Wiki format.  Please help!  '''Also, credit for writing this GREAT article goes to ZetaX'''. --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Sean]] 23:56, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
 
I copied this from the AoPS Formulary, and it needs to be converted to Wiki format.  Please help!  '''Also, credit for writing this GREAT article goes to ZetaX'''. --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Sean]] 23:56, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
  
I take issue with the notation <math>\mathbb{Z}_n</math> for integers modulo ''n''. When ''n'' is prime, this notation is used for the ''p''-adic integers, which do not really have any other notation (well perhaps <math>\widehat{\mathbb{Z}}_p</math>, but that's not much different). --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 01:22, 27 June 2006 (EDT)
+
I take issue with the notation <math>\mathbb{Z}_n</math> for integers modulo ''n''. When ''n'' is prime, this notation is used for the ''p''-adic integers, which do not really have any other notation (well perhaps <math>{\widehat{\mathbb{Z}}}_p</math>, but that's not much different). --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 01:22, 27 June 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:23, 27 June 2006

I copied this from the AoPS Formulary, and it needs to be converted to Wiki format. Please help! Also, credit for writing this GREAT article goes to ZetaX. --Sean 23:56, 26 June 2006 (EDT)

I take issue with the notation $\mathbb{Z}_n$ for integers modulo n. When n is prime, this notation is used for the p-adic integers, which do not really have any other notation (well perhaps ${\widehat{\mathbb{Z}}}_p$, but that's not much different). --ComplexZeta 01:22, 27 June 2006 (EDT)

Invalid username
Login to AoPS