Difference between revisions of "Talk:National Security Agency"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Yes, wiki articles should be factual and apolitical. "tapping your phones" is at best a gross oversimplification and at worst a political statement. The other parts of the NSA description are also oversimplified and a bit misleading. --[[User:DPatrick|DPatrick]] 13:52, 7 July 2006 (EDT) | Yes, wiki articles should be factual and apolitical. "tapping your phones" is at best a gross oversimplification and at worst a political statement. The other parts of the NSA description are also oversimplified and a bit misleading. --[[User:DPatrick|DPatrick]] 13:52, 7 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I should add that if someone would like to write a ''factual'', ''unbiased'' description of the phone-tapping issue, it would be an appropriate addition to the article. --[[User:DPatrick|DPatrick]] 13:57, 7 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:57, 7 July 2006
An important quality of a Wiki is to be unbiased. Should we remove the part about "tapping your phones?" --Sean 13:48, 7 July 2006 (EDT)
Yes, wiki articles should be factual and apolitical. "tapping your phones" is at best a gross oversimplification and at worst a political statement. The other parts of the NSA description are also oversimplified and a bit misleading. --DPatrick 13:52, 7 July 2006 (EDT)
I should add that if someone would like to write a factual, unbiased description of the phone-tapping issue, it would be an appropriate addition to the article. --DPatrick 13:57, 7 July 2006 (EDT)
