Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pascal's triangle"
(Divs/tables vs. wiki-syntax) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Well I have an interesting propety. If you color the odd entries of the Pascal's Triangle , you get the Sierpinski Gasket. So Sean add that. You might want to see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_gasket | Well I have an interesting propety. If you color the odd entries of the Pascal's Triangle , you get the Sierpinski Gasket. So Sean add that. You might want to see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_gasket | ||
] --[[User:Vihang|Vihang]] | ] --[[User:Vihang|Vihang]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Divs/tables vs. wiki-syntax == | ||
| + | |||
| + | At some point, the divs and tables currently used for the triangle illustrations should probably be converted to wiki-syntax tables. It's not especially urgent (given that they work fine right now), but I get the impression its best to use wiki-syntax whenever possible. --[[User:Dschafer|Dschafer]] 23:32, 24 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:32, 24 June 2006
I added some more content, and I think I messed up the image...I am used to images on Wikipedia, but AoPS has the little sidebar on the right, so images render differently when aligned right. Is there a workaround? And if someone can figure out a better way to display this image, please fix it! --Sean 15:08, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
I propose starting row and column count with 0 so as to make things work out more naturally. What do others say? --ComplexZeta 15:50, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
ComplexZeta: Very much agreed. I've never seen it done the other way. --Dschafer 17:49, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
Well I have an interesting propety. If you color the odd entries of the Pascal's Triangle , you get the Sierpinski Gasket. So Sean add that. You might want to see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_gasket ] --Vihang
Divs/tables vs. wiki-syntax
At some point, the divs and tables currently used for the triangle illustrations should probably be converted to wiki-syntax tables. It's not especially urgent (given that they work fine right now), but I get the impression its best to use wiki-syntax whenever possible. --Dschafer 23:32, 24 June 2006 (EDT)
