Difference between revisions of "Talk:Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion"

m
Line 6: Line 6:
 
Adeel, why don't you find the link for your Mathmatical Ideas topic PDF on this and add a link?  It might prove useful to anyone beginning combinatorics.  --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Mysmartmouth]] 14:35, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
 
Adeel, why don't you find the link for your Mathmatical Ideas topic PDF on this and add a link?  It might prove useful to anyone beginning combinatorics.  --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Mysmartmouth]] 14:35, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
  
5 set example...um, wow... Btw, are you using \mid instead of just |
+
5 set example...um, wow... Btw, are you using \mid instead of just | --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 15:51, 2 July 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:51, 2 July 2006

I forgot to write Summary. I added the statement, but it doesn't look very good.


It'll look fine after someone adds some more introductory-level information (such as citing a few simpler examples first, before jumping to the semi-general result, which will be indecipherable to a young beginner). Then it will be lower on the page and the big gap won't appear. --Rrusczyk 13:25, 18 June 2006 (EDT)

Adeel, why don't you find the link for your Mathmatical Ideas topic PDF on this and add a link? It might prove useful to anyone beginning combinatorics. --Mysmartmouth 14:35, 18 June 2006 (EDT)

5 set example...um, wow... Btw, are you using \mid instead of just | --Joe 15:51, 2 July 2006 (EDT)

Invalid username
Login to AoPS