Difference between revisions of "Talk:Quadratic reciprocity"

Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Actually the quadratic residue page is just better. Maybe this one should just redirect. I sort of threw this one together quickly, so it's not that good. What do others think? --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 22:05, 12 July 2006 (EDT)
 
Actually the quadratic residue page is just better. Maybe this one should just redirect. I sort of threw this one together quickly, so it's not that good. What do others think? --[[User:ComplexZeta|ComplexZeta]] 22:05, 12 July 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
I think you shouldn't bother to cover stuff like "what is the legendre symbol" and so on -- just put a sentence at the beggining saying that you need to understand Quadratic Residues before you understand Quadratic Reciprocity.  Then carry on with the content that is specific to reciprocity.--[[User:JBL|JBL]] 09:58, 13 July 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 09:58, 13 July 2006

Someone who knows the subject better than I should probably take a look at Quadratic residues and figure out the material should be split between this article and that one. --Dschafer 21:36, 12 July 2006 (EDT)

Actually the quadratic residue page is just better. Maybe this one should just redirect. I sort of threw this one together quickly, so it's not that good. What do others think? --ComplexZeta 22:05, 12 July 2006 (EDT)

I think you shouldn't bother to cover stuff like "what is the legendre symbol" and so on -- just put a sentence at the beggining saying that you need to understand Quadratic Residues before you understand Quadratic Reciprocity. Then carry on with the content that is specific to reciprocity.--JBL 09:58, 13 July 2006 (EDT)

Invalid username
Login to AoPS