Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sieve of Eratosthenes"

 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This was in the article but I took this out:
 
This was in the article but I took this out:
  
'''It would be nice to really run the sieve up to 15 or 20; unfortunately, I could not find any good way to represent circled and crossed out numbers; italic and bold styles are not distinctive enough and to create crossed numbers in LaTeX is a headache. Maybe somebody else has an idea how to do it...'''
+
''It would be nice to really run the sieve up to 15 or 20; unfortunately, I could not find any good way to represent circled and crossed out numbers; italic and bold styles are not distinctive enough and to create crossed numbers in LaTeX is a headache. Maybe somebody else has an idea how to do it...''
  
Things like this need to go on the discussion page instead of the main article page. [[User:Joml88|Joe]] 15:59, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
+
Things like this need to go on the discussion page instead of the main article page.  
 +
[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 15:59, 19 June 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:00, 19 June 2006

This was in the article but I took this out:

It would be nice to really run the sieve up to 15 or 20; unfortunately, I could not find any good way to represent circled and crossed out numbers; italic and bold styles are not distinctive enough and to create crossed numbers in LaTeX is a headache. Maybe somebody else has an idea how to do it...

Things like this need to go on the discussion page instead of the main article page. Joe 15:59, 19 June 2006 (EDT)