Difference between revisions of "User talk:Fedja"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think you're starting to create internal links to topics that are a bit obscure in phrasing. For instance, '''pi is not Liouvillian''' doesn't seem like a topic that warrants its own article. The same information could be compiled under one of several other articles.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 12:03, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | I think you're starting to create internal links to topics that are a bit obscure in phrasing. For instance, '''pi is not Liouvillian''' doesn't seem like a topic that warrants its own article. The same information could be compiled under one of several other articles.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 12:03, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree that the title is far from perfection, so feel free to change it. On the other hand, the proof of the non-Liouvillian charachter of <math>\pi</math> is sufficiently long and complicated to deserve its own article. My plan was to give the proofs for <math>\pi</math>, <math>e</math> and <math>\ln 2</math>. To combine them all in one article would be a disaster: it'll be just too long to be readable. On the other hand, if you can come up with a better structure and article titles for this small series, I'll be only happy.--[[User:Fedja|Fedja]] 12:44, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:44, 26 June 2006
I think you're starting to create internal links to topics that are a bit obscure in phrasing. For instance, pi is not Liouvillian doesn't seem like a topic that warrants its own article. The same information could be compiled under one of several other articles.--MCrawford 12:03, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
I agree that the title is far from perfection, so feel free to change it. On the other hand, the proof of the non-Liouvillian charachter of 
is sufficiently long and complicated to deserve its own article. My plan was to give the proofs for , 
and 
. To combine them all in one article would be a disaster: it'll be just too long to be readable. On the other hand, if you can come up with a better structure and article titles for this small series, I'll be only happy.--Fedja 12:44, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
