2016 USAMO Problems/Problem 2
Contents
Problem
Prove that for any positive integer
is an integer.
Solution 1
Define for all rational numbers
and primes
, where if
, then
, and
is the greatest power of
that divides
for integer
. Note that the expression(that we're trying to prove is an integer) is clearly rational, call it
.
, by Legendre. Clearly,
, and
, where
is the remainder function(we take out groups of
which are just permutations of numbers
to
until there are less than
left, then we have
distinct values, which the minimum sum is attained at
to
). Thus,
, as the term in each summand is a sum of floors also and is clearly an integer.
Solution 2 (Controversial)
Consider an grid, which is to be filled with the integers
through
such that the numbers in each row are in increasing order from left to right, and such that the numbers in each column are in increasing order from bottom to top. In other words, we are creating an
standard Young tableaux.
The Hook Length Formula is the source of the controversy, as it is very powerful and trivializes this problem. The Hook Length Formula states that the number of ways to create this standard Young tableaux (call this for convenience) is:
Now, we do some simple rearrangement:
This is exactly the expression given in the problem! Since the expression given in the problem equals the number of distinct
standard Young tableaux, it must be an integer, so we are done.
Solution 3 (Induction)
Define Clearly,
and
Then Lots of terms cancel, and we are left with
The numerator has
consecutive positive integers, so one of them must be divisible by
Also, there are
terms left,
of which are even. We can choose one of these to cancel out the
in the denominator. Therefore, the ratio between
and
is an integer. By our inductive hypothesis,
is an integer. Therefore,
is as well, and we are done.
Note: This is incorrect.
Solution 4
Let us work in the ring of polynomials . Define
Since
we have
Set
Then
Combine the last two sums:
Hence
But for each
, the difference
counts the multiples of
in the interval
. As
runs from
to
, these
intervals lie inside
, so
It follows that
, hence
. Evaluating at
completes the proof.
~Lopkiloinm
Note: This solution is fundamentally different from the first, which works purely in the integers. Here, we work in the integer polynomial ring —a graded algebra—which allows us to test integrality by tracking the multiplicities of better organized elements like
for all integers
. In contrast, working in
—a non-graded algebra—requires using
-adic valuations via Legendre’s formula, which only considers primes which are less organized. The graded structure of
simplifies the analysis, making it a powerful strategy to lift problems into a graded algebra whenever possible.
See also
2016 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |