Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "2011 USAMO Problems/Problem 5"

m
(Add solution from page isogonal conjugate)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Lemma. If <math>AB</math> and <math>CD</math> are not parallel, then <math>AB, CD, Q_1 Q_2</math> are concurrent.
 
Lemma. If <math>AB</math> and <math>CD</math> are not parallel, then <math>AB, CD, Q_1 Q_2</math> are concurrent.
  
−
Proof. Let <math>AB</math> and <math>CD</math> meet at <math>R</math>. Notice that with respect to triangle <math>ADR</math>, <math>P</math> and <math>Q_2</math> are isogonal conjugates. With respect to triangle <math>BCR</math>, <math>P</math> and <math>Q_1</math> are isogonal conjugates. Therefore, <math>Q_1</math> and <math>Q_2</math> lie on the reflection of <math>RP</math> in the angle bisector of <math>\angle{DRA}</math>, so <math>R, Q_1, Q_2</math> are collinear. Hence, <math>AB, CD, Q_1 Q_2</math> are concurrent at <math>R</math>.
+
Proof. Let <math>AB</math> and <math>CD</math> meet at <math>R</math>. Notice that with respect to triangle <math>ADR</math>, <math>P</math> and <math>Q_2</math> are isogonal conjugates (this can be proven by dropping altitudes from <math>Q_2</math> to <math>AB</math>, <math>CD</math>, and <math>AD</math> or <math>BC</math> depending on where <math>R</math> is). With respect to triangle <math>BCR</math>, <math>P</math> and <math>Q_1</math> are isogonal conjugates. Therefore, <math>Q_1</math> and <math>Q_2</math> lie on the reflection of <math>RP</math> in the angle bisector of <math>\angle{DRA}</math>, so <math>R, Q_1, Q_2</math> are collinear. Hence, <math>AB, CD, Q_1 Q_2</math> are concurrent at <math>R</math>.
  
 
Now suppose <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB</math> but <math>Q_1 Q_2</math> is not parallel to <math>CD</math>. Then <math>AB</math> and <math>CD</math> are not parallel and thus intersect at a point <math>R</math>. But then <math>Q_1 Q_2</math> also passes through <math>R</math>, contradicting <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB</math>. A similar contradiction occurs if <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel CD</math> but <math>Q_1 Q_2</math> is not parallel to <math>AB</math>, so we can conclude that <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB</math> if and only if <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel CD</math>.
 
Now suppose <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB</math> but <math>Q_1 Q_2</math> is not parallel to <math>CD</math>. Then <math>AB</math> and <math>CD</math> are not parallel and thus intersect at a point <math>R</math>. But then <math>Q_1 Q_2</math> also passes through <math>R</math>, contradicting <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB</math>. A similar contradiction occurs if <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel CD</math> but <math>Q_1 Q_2</math> is not parallel to <math>AB</math>, so we can conclude that <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB</math> if and only if <math>Q_1 Q_2 \parallel CD</math>.
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
Applying the law of sines to the triangles with vertices at P yields <math>S=\frac{|PC|}{|PB|}\frac{|PA|}{|PD|}\frac{|PD|}{|PC|}\frac{|PB|}{|PA|}=1</math>.
 
Applying the law of sines to the triangles with vertices at P yields <math>S=\frac{|PC|}{|PB|}\frac{|PA|}{|PD|}\frac{|PD|}{|PC|}\frac{|PB|}{|PA|}=1</math>.
 +
 +
== Solution 3 ==
 +
 +
<i><b>Case 1</b></i> The lines <math>AB</math> and <math>CD</math> are not parallel. Denote <math>E = AB \cap CD.</math>
 +
 +
<cmath>\angle Q_1 BC = \angle ABP, \angle Q_1 CB = \angle DCP \implies</cmath>
 +
Point <math>Q_1</math> isogonal conjugate of a point <math>P</math> with respect to a triangle <math>\triangle EBC \implies</math>
 +
 +
<math>EP</math> and <math>EQ_1</math> are isogonals with respect to <math>\angle BEC.</math>
 +
 +
Similarly point <math>Q_2</math> isogonal conjugate of a point <math>P</math> with respect to a triangle <math>\triangle EAD \implies</math>
 +
 +
<math>EP</math> and <math>EQ_2</math> are isogonals with respect to <math>\angle BEC.</math>
 +
 +
Therefore points <math>E, Q_1, Q_2</math> lies on the isogonal <math>EP</math> with respect to <math>\angle BEC \implies</math>
 +
 +
<math>Q_1Q_2</math> is not parallel to <math>AB</math> or <math>CD.</math>
 +
 +
<i><b>Case 2</b></i>  <math>AB||CD.</math> We use <i><b>The isogonal theorem in case parallel lines</b></i> and get
 +
<cmath>AB||Q_1Q_2 || CD. \blacksquare</cmath>
 +
 +
'''vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss'''
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Latest revision as of 18:22, 15 February 2025

Problem

Let $P$ be a given point inside quadrilateral $ABCD$. Points $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ are located within $ABCD$ such that $\angle Q_1 BC = \angle ABP$, $\angle Q_1 CB = \angle DCP$, $\angle Q_2 AD = \angle BAP$, $\angle Q_2 DA = \angle CDP$. Prove that $\overline{Q_1 Q_2} \parallel \overline{AB}$ if and only if $\overline{Q_1 Q_2} \parallel \overline{CD}$.

Solution 1

Lemma. If $AB$ and $CD$ are not parallel, then $AB, CD, Q_1 Q_2$ are concurrent.

Proof. Let $AB$ and $CD$ meet at $R$. Notice that with respect to triangle $ADR$, $P$ and $Q_2$ are isogonal conjugates (this can be proven by dropping altitudes from $Q_2$ to $AB$, $CD$, and $AD$ or $BC$ depending on where $R$ is). With respect to triangle $BCR$, $P$ and $Q_1$ are isogonal conjugates. Therefore, $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ lie on the reflection of $RP$ in the angle bisector of $\angle{DRA}$, so $R, Q_1, Q_2$ are collinear. Hence, $AB, CD, Q_1 Q_2$ are concurrent at $R$.

Now suppose $Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB$ but $Q_1 Q_2$ is not parallel to $CD$. Then $AB$ and $CD$ are not parallel and thus intersect at a point $R$. But then $Q_1 Q_2$ also passes through $R$, contradicting $Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB$. A similar contradiction occurs if $Q_1 Q_2 \parallel CD$ but $Q_1 Q_2$ is not parallel to $AB$, so we can conclude that $Q_1 Q_2 \parallel AB$ if and only if $Q_1 Q_2 \parallel CD$.

Solution 2

First note that $\overline{Q_1 Q_2} \parallel \overline{AB}$ if and only if the altitudes from $Q_1$ and $Q_2$ to $\overline{AB}$ are the same, or $|Q_1B|\sin \angle ABQ_1 =|Q_2A|\sin \angle BAQ_2$. Similarly $\overline{Q_1 Q_2} \parallel \overline{CD}$ iff $|Q_1C|\sin \angle DCQ_1 =|Q_2D|\sin \angle CDQ_2$.


If we define $S =\frac{|Q_1B|\sin \angle ABQ_1}{|Q_2A|\sin \angle BAQ_2} \times \frac{|Q_2D|\sin \angle CDQ_2}{|Q_1C|\sin \angle DCQ_1}$, then we are done if we can show that S=1.


By the law of sines, $\frac{|Q_1B|}{|Q_1C|}=\frac{\sin\angle Q_1CB}{\sin\angle Q_1BC}$ and $\frac{|Q_2D|}{|Q_2A|}=\frac{\sin\angle Q_2AD}{\sin\angle Q_2DA}$.


So, $S=\frac{\sin \angle ABQ_1}{\sin \angle BAQ_2}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle CDQ_2}{\sin \angle DCQ_1}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle BCQ_1}{\sin \angle CBQ_1}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle DAQ_2}{\sin \angle ADQ_2}$


By the terms of the problem, $S=\frac{\sin \angle PBC}{\sin \angle PAD}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle PDA}{\sin \angle PCB}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle PCD}{\sin \angle PBA}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle PAB}{\sin \angle PDC}$. (If two subangles of an angle of the quadrilateral are equal, then their complements at that quadrilateral angle are equal as well.)


Rearranging yields $S= \frac{\sin \angle PBC}{\sin \angle PCB}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle PDA}{\sin \angle PAD}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle PCD}{\sin \angle PDC}\cdot\frac{\sin \angle PAB}{\sin \angle PBA}$.


Applying the law of sines to the triangles with vertices at P yields $S=\frac{|PC|}{|PB|}\frac{|PA|}{|PD|}\frac{|PD|}{|PC|}\frac{|PB|}{|PA|}=1$.

Solution 3

Case 1 The lines $AB$ and $CD$ are not parallel. Denote $E = AB \cap CD.$

\[\angle Q_1 BC = \angle ABP, \angle Q_1 CB = \angle DCP \implies\] Point $Q_1$ isogonal conjugate of a point $P$ with respect to a triangle $\triangle EBC \implies$

$EP$ and $EQ_1$ are isogonals with respect to $\angle BEC.$

Similarly point $Q_2$ isogonal conjugate of a point $P$ with respect to a triangle $\triangle EAD \implies$

$EP$ and $EQ_2$ are isogonals with respect to $\angle BEC.$

Therefore points $E, Q_1, Q_2$ lies on the isogonal $EP$ with respect to $\angle BEC \implies$

$Q_1Q_2$ is not parallel to $AB$ or $CD.$

Case 2 $AB||CD.$ We use The isogonal theorem in case parallel lines and get \[AB||Q_1Q_2 || CD. \blacksquare\]

vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss

See also

2011 USAMO (Problems • Resources)
Preceded by
Problem 4 		Followed by
Problem 6
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6
All USAMO Problems and Solutions

These problems are copyrighted © by the Mathematical Association of America, as part of the American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=2011_USAMO_Problems/Problem_5&oldid=242805"