Revival?
by agbdmrbirdyface, May 25, 2017, 4:51 PM
I think it's time to revive this blog.
Solution:![[asy]
size(250);
pair a1, a2, b1, b2, p, q, c, x, y;
path s1 = unitcircle;
draw(s1, blue);
path s2 = circle((2,0), 1.25);
draw(s2, blue);
pair[] ips = intersectionpoints(s1, s2);
p = ips[0];
q = ips[1];
a1 = dir(130);
b1 = dir(190);
x = 4*p - 3*a1;
pair[] aips = intersectionpoints(p--x, s2);
a2 = aips[1];
y = 4*p - 3*b1;
pair[] bips = intersectionpoints(p--y, s2);
b2 = bips[1];
c= extension(a1, b1, a2, b2);
draw(c--b1--b2--c--a2--a1, red);
draw(circumcircle(c, a1, a2), orange);
draw(circumcircle(c, b1, b2), linetype("8 8"));
dot(p);
dot(q);
dot(a1);
dot(b1);
dot(a2);
dot(b2);
dot(c);
label("$P$", p, dir(91)*1.5);
label("$Q$", q, S*1.5);
label("$A_1$", a1, dir(150));
label("$A_2$", a2, dir(320));
label("$B_1$", b1, dir(220));
label("$B_2$", b2, dir(40));
label("$C$", c, dir(100));
[/asy]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/3/2/9322d314427bfc8e30359221baa988cc0df8f3cc.png)
We utilize the following lemmas:
Lemma 1: In a complete quadrilateral
, and
, the circles
,
,
, and
concur at a point
. This point is the Miquel point.
Proof sketch: Spiral similarity.
Lemma 2: In a complete quadrilateral
, and
, the centers of the circles
,
,
, and
are concyclic with the Miquel point.
Proof sketch: More spiral similarity and angle chasing.
Note that
is a complete quadrilateral, regardless of the choice of
. Circle
passes through
, which can be proven through directed angle chasing. However, noting that
is the Miquel point is sufficient, since it's already the intersection of two of the circles.
Lemma 2 implies
is concyclic with the centers of
and
. Since this is fixed, and the center of
lies on this circle, we know this is the circular locus of this center, thus finishing the problem.
Tidbit:
2002 ISL G4 wrote:
Circles
and
intersect at points
and
. Distinct points
and
(not at
or
) are selected on
. The lines
and
meet
again at
and
respectively, and the lines
and
meet at
. Prove that, as
and
vary, the circumcenters of triangles
all lie on one fixed circle.




















Solution:
![[asy]
size(250);
pair a1, a2, b1, b2, p, q, c, x, y;
path s1 = unitcircle;
draw(s1, blue);
path s2 = circle((2,0), 1.25);
draw(s2, blue);
pair[] ips = intersectionpoints(s1, s2);
p = ips[0];
q = ips[1];
a1 = dir(130);
b1 = dir(190);
x = 4*p - 3*a1;
pair[] aips = intersectionpoints(p--x, s2);
a2 = aips[1];
y = 4*p - 3*b1;
pair[] bips = intersectionpoints(p--y, s2);
b2 = bips[1];
c= extension(a1, b1, a2, b2);
draw(c--b1--b2--c--a2--a1, red);
draw(circumcircle(c, a1, a2), orange);
draw(circumcircle(c, b1, b2), linetype("8 8"));
dot(p);
dot(q);
dot(a1);
dot(b1);
dot(a2);
dot(b2);
dot(c);
label("$P$", p, dir(91)*1.5);
label("$Q$", q, S*1.5);
label("$A_1$", a1, dir(150));
label("$A_2$", a2, dir(320));
label("$B_1$", b1, dir(220));
label("$B_2$", b2, dir(40));
label("$C$", c, dir(100));
[/asy]](http://latex.artofproblemsolving.com/9/3/2/9322d314427bfc8e30359221baa988cc0df8f3cc.png)
We utilize the following lemmas:
Lemma 1: In a complete quadrilateral







Proof sketch: Spiral similarity.
Lemma 2: In a complete quadrilateral






Proof sketch: More spiral similarity and angle chasing.
Note that





Lemma 2 implies




Tidbit:
i'm lowkey writing this in english/bio class when I should be working on various projects oh well 
