A Weird but Interesting Distribution pt II

by 3ch03s, Mar 27, 2016, 12:47 AM

In the first part I define an interesting distribution. Let $X_n,n\in \mathbb{N}$ a bernoulli iid sequence with parameter $p \in ]0,1[$, and let
$R=\sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \frac{X_n}{2^n}$

We called it $X\sim rm(p)$.
We also showed some interesting properties of his probability distribution (cumulated) function, and we give some clues about the behavior of the distribution when p=1/2.

I claim when p=1/2, $R$ has the uniform distribution (which is in fact, the lebesgue measure in [0,1]). Also we give this property of cdf:

$F(r)=(1-p)F(2r)+pF(2r-1)$

Then we can compute any value of this distribution using dyadic aproximations of any number $r$ in [0,1]. Is pretty clear the sequence of aproximations has the form $x_n=\sum_{i=1}^n a_i/2^i$. this implies that for any number of the form $r=k/2^n$, with $k<2^n$ natural, F(r) has a "closed" form, because we are dealing with a finite number of bernoulli variables in that case.

we know every number $x$ in [0,1] has a unique (in the sense of unique sequence of 0's and 1's without getting finite 0's) binary representation, with this, we can compute $F(r)$ if $r=k/2^n$, which using the recurssion formula leads to:

$F(k/2^n)=\sum_{\sum x_i/2^i \leq k/2^n} p^{\sum x_i}(1-p)^{n-\sum x_k}$

Another aproach to the formula is thinking in the secuence of 0 and 1 for the finite dyadic representation.
So for every aproximation $r_n$ we can compute using this recurssion:

$F(x_n)=F(x_{n-1})+a_i(p^{\sum x_i})(1-p)^{n-\sum x_i}$

¿What happens when $p=1/2$?

the formula for dyadic numbers just reduces to:

$F(k/2^n)=\sum_{\sum x_i/2^i \leq k/2^n} 1/2^n=k/2^n$, hence, any dyadic number $r$ has the propierty $F(r)=r$, then, the recursion for any dyadic approximation gives $F(x_n)=x_n$, So in the limit, by density arguments that i will justificate soon, we have $F(x)=x$ for any $x  \in [0,1]$, so, for p=1/2, the distribution is in fact, the uniform distribution and hence has a pdf.

But... what about the image of X? are [0,1]?... in fact, because the representation, the uniform distribution does not go trough the whole interval, just, a select set of numbers in [0,1] with the property: $x \in [0,1], x=\sum x_n/2^n|\frac 1n \sum x_i \to 1/2$.

So we define:

$A_p=\{ x \in {0,1}, x=\sum x_n/2_n, x_n \in \{0,1\}, \textrm{such that } \frac 1n\sum x_n \to p\}$

and hence $[0,1]=\bigcup_{p \in [0,1]} A_p$.

if $X \sim rm(p)$ then the image of X is $A_p$.
its clear that $A_p$ and $A_q$ are disjoint if $p \neq q$. We will use this property using the fact if p=1/2, $X \sim  U[0,1]$, and hence the probability measure is in fact, the Lebesgue measure in [0,1], so, exists a pdf by radon-nykodym theorem. Let $\lambda$ the Lebesgue measure in [0,1], write:
$[0,1]=A_{1/2} \cup \bigcup_{p \neq 1/2} A_p$
Clearly $A_{1/2}$ and the rest of the union are disjoint.
so:
$\lambda([0,1])=1=\lambda (A_{1/2})+\lambda (\bigcup_{p \neq 1/2} A_p)$

Comment

0 Comments

Shouts
Submit
  • hi
    also dead blog

    by aidan0626, Oct 10, 2022, 9:03 PM

  • hai.....

    by fluff_E, Dec 17, 2021, 5:13 PM

  • omg so pro

    by mathboy282, Sep 16, 2021, 4:52 AM

  • how is he so good?

    by centslordm, Aug 8, 2021, 3:45 PM

  • hello comrade

    by tauros, Sep 3, 2020, 2:55 PM

  • HOLA AMIGOS!

    by dolphindesigner, Mar 12, 2020, 12:41 AM

  • puedes hablar espanol conmigo?

    by Eugenis, Aug 12, 2015, 3:04 AM

  • tengo shouts? yaaaa.....

    by 3ch03s, Aug 11, 2015, 7:38 PM

  • hola. Mi nombre es claudio, soy chileno (y la ctm) Ingeniero civil Matematico con menci??n en estadistica aceptado en el doctorado de Estadpistica de la puc. Mucho Floyd Buki TB-303 y Lacie Baskerville y disco house.

    by 3ch03s, Nov 18, 2014, 4:29 AM

9 shouts
Tags
About Owner
  • Posts: 1318
  • Joined: May 23, 2014
Blog Stats
  • Blog created: Jun 9, 2014
  • Total entries: 3
  • Total visits: 1235
  • Total comments: 0
Search Blog
a