Y by GoJensenOrGoHome, Adventure10
Hello everyone.
This is my first actual AOPS post, even though I'm a long time IMO competitor and an avid AOPS user.
If you don't want to read the Problem History, you can scroll down to read the statement right away.
Problem History
The reason why I'm writing this post is to publish a very interesting geometry problem, which I've created with the help of a group of friends of mine. I started creating the problem around 2 years ago, when I heard about another geometry problem, and I developed the idea used in that problem into something much more, together with two of my friends. We reached some interesting conclusions, but couldn't prove any of it, so we stopped working on it after a month or so. I continued working on that problem alone for another two months maybe, and then I let it go.
About half a year ago, while I was on a math competition abroad, I told one of my teammates about the problem and he was interested in solving it together with me, so we resumed the investigation. He proposed one crucial idea that reshaped the problem into something totally different, and after I'd noticed one more important fact, we completely formed the problem. We still couldn't prove any of it, because it all seemed too difficult. After the competition, we stopped working on it.
Finally, around two weeks ago, I remembered the problem, and used Wolfram Mathematica to prove it. And guess what... Our hunch was indeed correct. A brand new geometry problem was born, and I was quite satisfied. That means that our solution to the problem was indeed correct, since we finally got a computerized proof. But to me, it's still not over. I want to know if there are any normal ways to prove this...Without using extreme analytic computations performed by a sophisticated mathematical program.
That is why I'm posting this problem as a challenge to everyone else who wants to try and solve it. Maybe someone here can pull it off? I don't know. I've shown this problem to a lot of successful IMO competitors, and none of them were close to solving it. I honestly think the problem is difficult, but I don't know how difficult it actually is. Anyhow, I'm going to post the problem statement text now. Good luck and best wishes to everyone!
Problem Statement
Three fixed points,
,
and
, are given such that
is a scalene triangle. A variable real parameter
is also given, and six points,
,
,
,
,
and
, are defined by the following six vector equalities:






Let
be the circumcenter of triangle
, and
the circumcenter of triangle
. The point
is defined as the midpoint of
.
For any fixed triple of points
,
and
, find the locus of
, as
takes all possible real values.
This is my first actual AOPS post, even though I'm a long time IMO competitor and an avid AOPS user.
If you don't want to read the Problem History, you can scroll down to read the statement right away.
Problem History
The reason why I'm writing this post is to publish a very interesting geometry problem, which I've created with the help of a group of friends of mine. I started creating the problem around 2 years ago, when I heard about another geometry problem, and I developed the idea used in that problem into something much more, together with two of my friends. We reached some interesting conclusions, but couldn't prove any of it, so we stopped working on it after a month or so. I continued working on that problem alone for another two months maybe, and then I let it go.
About half a year ago, while I was on a math competition abroad, I told one of my teammates about the problem and he was interested in solving it together with me, so we resumed the investigation. He proposed one crucial idea that reshaped the problem into something totally different, and after I'd noticed one more important fact, we completely formed the problem. We still couldn't prove any of it, because it all seemed too difficult. After the competition, we stopped working on it.
Finally, around two weeks ago, I remembered the problem, and used Wolfram Mathematica to prove it. And guess what... Our hunch was indeed correct. A brand new geometry problem was born, and I was quite satisfied. That means that our solution to the problem was indeed correct, since we finally got a computerized proof. But to me, it's still not over. I want to know if there are any normal ways to prove this...Without using extreme analytic computations performed by a sophisticated mathematical program.
That is why I'm posting this problem as a challenge to everyone else who wants to try and solve it. Maybe someone here can pull it off? I don't know. I've shown this problem to a lot of successful IMO competitors, and none of them were close to solving it. I honestly think the problem is difficult, but I don't know how difficult it actually is. Anyhow, I'm going to post the problem statement text now. Good luck and best wishes to everyone!
Problem Statement
Three fixed points,

















Let






For any fixed triple of points





This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by IvanGD, Nov 4, 2015, 6:42 PM