Geometry #3 (Analysis of its diagram and expansion)
by XmL, Jun 29, 2014, 3:34 AM
First of all it feels good to return to doing geometry again 
Problem:Two circle
,
meet at A,B.Denote MN is common tangent near
of
(
,
.A line parallel
respectively meets
,
at
.
is intersection of
.Prove that
bisects angle 
I found this problem here: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=594183
Original solution
Computation Proof
I will present some facts about this diagram that we can deduce from this set up. Note that they are all based on the assumption that
are the outermost intersections with the circle.
Fun Fact 1:
.
We could've approached the original problem by proving this. However, this can be easily deduced from our set up, which contains a lot of cyclic quads and similar triangles.
Indeed, through some angle chasing we have
(side note:
are actually corresponding points wrt the two triangles). and
. Hence 
Fun Fact 2: The locus of
is actually the circle of similitude of
, aka the Appolonius circle of
. Hence it immediately follows from fact 1.
Intrestingly this fact in turn gives rise to a well known property regarding circle of similitude of two circles: If
lies on this circle, then
.
Fun Fact 3: Unrelated to the previous two facts, It follows from radical axis that
are collinear.

Problem:Two circle














I found this problem here: http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=594183
Original solution
Note that I will only consider the case when
are the outer most intersection points. The other two cases can be proven similarly.
Construct
. Since
are tangent to the two circles, by a property of tangents
are concyclic. Similarly
are concyclic. Moreover, since
, therefore
are concyclic. Hence
which is what we desire to prove.

Construct







Computation Proof
Lemma: Let
denote the distance from
to
.
Then
where
is the radius of 
Proof: Project
onto
at
and then use Pythagorean theorem on
:
.
Now we apply this lemma on
:
same distance since
. Hence
.
Similarly if we apply this lemma for
we get
.
Assuming
are not collinear. Then by law of sines
which is true since
, and we are done.



Then



Proof: Project





Now we apply this lemma on




Similarly if we apply this lemma for


Assuming



I will present some facts about this diagram that we can deduce from this set up. Note that they are all based on the assumption that

Fun Fact 1:

We could've approached the original problem by proving this. However, this can be easily deduced from our set up, which contains a lot of cyclic quads and similar triangles.
Indeed, through some angle chasing we have




Fun Fact 2: The locus of



Intrestingly this fact in turn gives rise to a well known property regarding circle of similitude of two circles: If


Fun Fact 3: Unrelated to the previous two facts, It follows from radical axis that

This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by XmL, Aug 12, 2014, 11:16 PM