Flatness
by iarnab_kundu, Dec 9, 2018, 10:31 PM
Proposition- Let
be an
module. Given an exact sequence of
modules
, then the tensored sequence
is exact.
We say that tensoring is "right exact". Thus we can consider its left derived functors. We shall call them the
functors. Given an
module
, we consider its free(or projective) resolution
. Then we define
to be the homology of the complex
. As we might check, we have that
.
Proposition- Given an exact sequence of
modules
we have a long exact sequence
.
Some computations-
(a) Let
be a free module. Then
is a free resolution of
. Thus
, for
. Thus free modules are flat, as one can prove otherwise.
(b) We can extend the above result for projective modules, and prove that they are flat.
(c) Let
. Then we have a
Examples-
(a) Let
be an (non-zero divisor?) element. Then
is flat over
.
Proof-
. Thus it commutes with colimits, and therefore with kernels.
What I have in mind is this. Given an exact sequence
we have exact sequences
. Therefore we can take the colimit and preserve the kernel.
(b) Let
be a prime ideal. Then
is flat over
.
Proof- Can we use similar idea as above?
Locality of Flatness-
Proposition- Let
be an
module, then the following conditions are equivalent
(a)
is flat over 
(b)
is flat over
for all prime ideals
in 
(c)
is flat over
for all maximal ideals
in 
Proof-
(a)
(b)
We know
is exact over
and we know that
.
Proposition- Let
be an
module, then the following conditions are equivalent
(a)
is flat over 
(b) For all ideals
in
, the tensored map
is injective
(b) For all finitely generated ideals
in
, the tensored map
is injective.
Proposition- $$





We say that tensoring is "right exact". Thus we can consider its left derived functors. We shall call them the







Proposition- Given an exact sequence of



Some computations-
(a) Let





(b) We can extend the above result for projective modules, and prove that they are flat.
(c) Let

Examples-
(a) Let



Proof-

What I have in mind is this. Given an exact sequence


(b) Let



Proof- Can we use similar idea as above?
Locality of Flatness-
Proposition- Let


(a)


(b)




(c)




Proof-
(a)

We know



Proposition- Let


(a)


(b) For all ideals



(b) For all finitely generated ideals



Proposition- $$
This post has been edited 3 times. Last edited by iarnab_kundu, Dec 10, 2018, 1:56 PM