by hemangsarkar, Sep 5, 2012, 2:30 PM
Q) prove that –

…..
My bashed up solution :
let

be

…..
Note that :
………
This is because –
Or,
.
Hence we have,

…..
Also, we have –

and so on
So we have
For the other inequality, we use a similar approach –
That means,
.
n can take values from

to
.
So we must have

….
So we have
.
Official solution : use am – hm for

part.
And for the other part,
Grouping together

terms at a time,

This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by hemangsarkar, Sep 5, 2012, 2:33 PM