Consequences of Tangent Circles Configurations
by XmL, Dec 5, 2015, 6:30 AM
Proposition1(Sawayama): Circle
is internally tangent to circle
at
.
are two chords of
that are tangent to
at
respectively. Prove that the incenters of
lie on
.
Lemma1: If
is constant for
, and
is tangent to
at
.
Let
.
where
is the radius of circle
, and this proves our lemma.
Correlary1:
bisects
by the converse of angle bisector theorem:
.
Proof of our proposition: Let
denote the incenter of
,
. By Correlary1
are collinear since
is the midpoint of arc
. By similarity,
, which is the constant described in Lemma1, therefore
, the power of
wrt
. Since
, thus
and
. Since
, therefore
. The last angle equality implies
are collinear and we are done because the incenter of
lies on
by symmetry.
Some properties I want to highlight and are trivial from the proof above:
Let
denote the incenter of
.
1.
and
are orthogonal
2.
are cyclic quadrilaterals.
3.
4.
are isogonal wrt
.
5.
are concyclic.
Property6:
is the midpoint of arc
that doesn't contain
. Prove that
are concyclic.
Proof: By property3
are isogonal wrt
. Since
externally bisects
, it also externally bisects
. As
by properties of incenters, therefore
is cyclic.
Correlary2:
are concurrent by radical axis theorem.
Property7:
is the midpoint of arc
that does not contain
. Prove that
are collinear. This is immediate by pascal's theorem.
Proposition 2:
are internally tangent to
at
.
are chords of
that are also internal common tangents of
like so in the diagram. Prove that the external tangent of these two circles closer to
than
is parallel to
.
Proof:
Let
be the midpoint of arc
that doesn't contain
. Define
and
similarly. Thus
is antiparallel to
wrt
. It suffices to show that
, which implies
is the external tangent. We will show that
.
is tangent to
at
,
is tangent to the same circles at
. By property7 we know
are collinear. Thus
. In addition,
. Dividing these two gives us
. Since
, the analogous expression for
equals
and we are done.









Lemma1: If





Let




Correlary1:



Proof of our proposition: Let



















Some properties I want to highlight and are trivial from the proof above:
Let


1.


2.

3.

4.


5.

Property6:




Proof: By property3







Correlary2:

Property7:




Proposition 2:









Proof:
Let























This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by XmL, Dec 5, 2015, 6:36 AM
Reason: .
Reason: .