J
U VIEW ATTACHMENTS
T PREVIEW
J CLOSE PREVIEW rREFRESH
J
4 Comments
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
by
MathAwesome123, Apr 15, 2017, 3:01 AM
- Report
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Wait actually that solution is incorrect.
RIP. Good point - will fix later
You missed the case where the radical axes don't even have an intersection, i.e. when
could be collinear, in which case
doesn't even exist.


RIP. Good point - will fix later
This post has been edited 1 time. Last edited by shiningsunnyday, Apr 15, 2017, 3:17 AM
by
MathAwesome123, Apr 15, 2017, 3:03 AM
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Even so, that additional complication was the hard part of the problem anyway.
by
MathAwesome123, Apr 15, 2017, 3:08 AM
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
To share with readers my favorite problem I came across today :) (Shout for contrib.)
Archives












Shouts
Submit
270 shouts
Contributors
62861 • aftermaths • agbdmrbirdyface • blue8931 • bluephoenix • cjquines0 • DeathLlama9 • doitsudoitsu • FlyingCucumber • hwl0304 • Irrational_phi • jdeaks1000 • MATH1945 • Mathaddict11 • MathAwesome123 • mathguy623 • mathmaster2000 • MathStudent2002 • monkey8 • pandyhu2001 • pinetree1 • rkm0959 • SantaDragon • shiningsunnyday • skipiano • wu2481632 • zephyrcrush78
Tags
About Owner
- Posts: 1350
- Joined: Dec 19, 2014
Blog Stats
- Blog created: Jun 11, 2016
- Total entries: 193
- Total visits: 31062
- Total comments: 579
Search Blog