The Ex-points and the Queue-points - Part One
by math_pi_rate, Dec 15, 2018, 2:35 PM
So this post is about six wonderful points related to triangle geometry (sorry for the delay btw
). These points do not have any specific names to the extent I know, but I like to call them the three Queue-points and the three Ex-points, one corresponding to each vertex of a triangle. We start by defining what these points are, followed by some of their basic properties (most of which are well known). Hopefully you all will enjoy this post (I have tried to include motivation to some of the hard problems given below; as promised by me in the shout box). So let's begin:-
Definition: Let
be the orthic triangle (i.e. triangle formed by foot of altitudes) of
, and let
be its orthocenter. Then the point where
and
meet is the
-Ex point (denoted by
from now on), and the point where
and
meet is the
-Queue point (denoted by
from now on). The points
and
are defined in a similar fashion.
PROPERTY-1 The points
are collinear.
Proof 1: By Radical Axis Theorem on
, we get that
concur; which gives that
are collinear. 
Proof 2: Invert the figure about
with radius
. Then, as
, we get that this inversion swaps
and
. Thus, this inversion also swaps
and
; which gives that
are collinear. 
PROPERTY-2 Let
be this midpoint of
, and
be the point diametrically opposite to
on
(i.e.
is the antipode of
in
). Then
are collinear.
Proof: As
and
, we get that
. Similarly, we get that
. This means that
is a parallelogram, and so
are collinear. Also, as
, we get that
are also collinear. Combining these two results, we have that
lie on a line. 
NOTE: The two properties given above are basically restatement of the fact that
is the Miquel Point of the cyclic quadrilateral
.
PROPERTY-3 Let
be the
-Humpty point (See here to find out what Humpty points are). Then
lie on a line perpendicular to the
-median
. In particular,
is a cyclic quadrilateral.
Proof: See my proof here.
PROPERTY-4 The points
lie on a line, which is known as the Orthic Axis of
.
Proof: Seeing three collinear points, one is immediately drawn to the idea of radical axis. Note that
, and so
lies on the radical axis of
and
. By symmetry, we get that
and
also lie on this line, and so we are done. 
REMARK: This also shows that the orthic axis is orthogonal to the Euler Line.
Let's begin with some problem solving. We can discover more properties en route.
PROBLEM-1 (Polish MO 2018 Problem 5)
Suppose
and
are the foot of the
and
altitudes of
. The line tangent to
at point
meets
at
. The line parallel to
that goes through point
meets
at
. Prove that
is perpendicular to the
-median of
.
Solution: Seeing the line
and the
-tangent, the first thing that comes to the mind is that both of them are anti-parallel to
, and so they must be in fact parallel to each other. As we are given a line parallel to
meeting a line parallel to
, we are inspired to try completing a parallelogram, and so we define the
-Ex point
. Now, we have a parallelogram in front of us, namely
. Involvement of the
-median and the orthocenter configuration, along with the perpendicularity to the
-median that needs to be proved, is a big indication to us to introduce the
-Humpty point
. Using Property-3, we just need to prove that
and
are parallel to each other.
The parallelism that needs to be shown again motivates us to complete a parallelogram, and so we define the point
. Then it suffices to show that
is a parallelogram; or equivalently that
. As
is a parallelogram, we just need to prove that
. Now note that as
, so in fact
is right-angled at vertex
. So we only have to show that
is the circumcenter of
, or that
. Noting that
is harmonic, and that
is tangent to
now easily finishes the problem. For a formal solution, see here. Another solution which I had found (does not involve Ex-points) is this.
REMARK: This problem provides a really nice method to connect tangents to the Ex-points. Also the solution uses an important concept, which is when you see parallel lines, try to find some parallelograms, as they have really nice properties, and also help in proving that some point is the midpoint of a line.
PROBLEM-2 (USA TSTST 2017 Problem 1)
Let
be a triangle with circumcircle
, circumcenter
, and orthocenter
. Assume that
and that
. Let
and
be the midpoints of sides
and
, respectively, and let
and
be the feet of the altitudes from
and
in
, respectively. Let
be the intersection of line
with the tangent line to
at
. Let
be the intersection point, other than
, of
with the circumcircle of
. Let
be the intersection of lines
and
. Prove that
.
Solution: Note that, using Property-1,
is in fact the
-Ex point of
. Then, by using the Remark given after Property-4, we just need to show that
lies on the orthic axis; or equivalently that it lies on the radical axis of the circumcircle and the nine-point circle of
. But this easily follows from the equality
. So much for a USA TSTST problem, huh
.
NOTE: There exists another nice solution to this problem, which uses the nice connection we had discovered to connect tangents and the Ex-points in the previous problem. See this solution here (Do read it; it is quite interesting).
PROBLEM-3 (RMM 2013 Problem 3)
Let
be a quadrilateral inscribed in a circle
. The lines
and
meet at
, the lines
and
meet at
, and the diagonals
and
meet at
. Let
be the midpoint of the segment
, and let
be the common point of the segment
and the circle
. Prove that the circumcircle of the triangle
and
are tangent to one another.
Solution: At first glance, you might be surprised to find this problem in this post. But you'll soon see why it is present here. On seeing the problem, the first thing that strikes the mind is Brokard's Theorem (If it doesn't, then just make it a habit to think of Brokard on seeing a complete quadrilateral). According to Brokard's Theorem,
is the orthocenter of
, and so, in order to make things more familiar, we restate the problem in terms of
as follows:-
On seeing a familiar configuration, I add in all the points which I think might turn out to be useful in the future. So we add the points
in the diagram (Inspiration to add
and
is that they are inverses wrt
, something we proved in Proof 2 of Property-1). Note that, from Property-2, we get that
, and so
is tangent to
. Inverting about
,
goes to
, and so we get that
is tangent to both
and
. This means that
, which directly gives the result that
is tangent to
.
REMARK: The fact that
is the common tangent of the two circles is a bit unmotivated, and it was by chance that I stumbled upon this fact while solving this problem (basically a nice diagram helped
). The only motivation is that
is the only nice point where the common tangent of the two circles might meet
, something which is common to Olympiad geo problems. The solution given above is a refined version of my original solution, which was quite complicated. You can see my original solution here.
I'll post some more harder problems in Part Two, but this is it for now. For a real challenge, try this problem (HINT: Look at the notation used).

Definition: Let













PROPERTY-1 The points

Proof 1: By Radical Axis Theorem on




Proof 2: Invert the figure about









PROPERTY-2 Let









Proof: As










NOTE: The two properties given above are basically restatement of the fact that


PROPERTY-3 Let






Proof: See my proof here.

PROPERTY-4 The points


Proof: Seeing three collinear points, one is immediately drawn to the idea of radical axis. Note that







REMARK: This also shows that the orthic axis is orthogonal to the Euler Line.
Let's begin with some problem solving. We can discover more properties en route.
PROBLEM-1 (Polish MO 2018 Problem 5)
Suppose
















Solution: Seeing the line














The parallelism that needs to be shown again motivates us to complete a parallelogram, and so we define the point














REMARK: This problem provides a really nice method to connect tangents to the Ex-points. Also the solution uses an important concept, which is when you see parallel lines, try to find some parallelograms, as they have really nice properties, and also help in proving that some point is the midpoint of a line.
PROBLEM-2 (USA TSTST 2017 Problem 1)
Let



























Solution: Note that, using Property-1,







NOTE: There exists another nice solution to this problem, which uses the nice connection we had discovered to connect tangents and the Ex-points in the previous problem. See this solution here (Do read it; it is quite interesting).
PROBLEM-3 (RMM 2013 Problem 3)
Let


















Solution: At first glance, you might be surprised to find this problem in this post. But you'll soon see why it is present here. On seeing the problem, the first thing that strikes the mind is Brokard's Theorem (If it doesn't, then just make it a habit to think of Brokard on seeing a complete quadrilateral). According to Brokard's Theorem,



Restated problem wrote:
Let
be the foot of the
-altitude and
be the orthocenter of
. Let
be the circle centered at
with radius
. Let
be the midpoint of
, and let
. Show that
is tangent to
.




























REMARK: The fact that




I'll post some more harder problems in Part Two, but this is it for now. For a real challenge, try this problem (HINT: Look at the notation used).
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by math_pi_rate, Apr 1, 2019, 6:48 AM
Reason: Typo
Reason: Typo