The Ex-points and the Queue-points - Part Two
by math_pi_rate, Mar 30, 2019, 8:12 PM
As promised by me in the shout box, here's the second part to the intro of these beautiful points (I guess a little late
). I'll try to cover some nice and hidden applications of this configuration, touching upon a variety of problems (hopefully
). So, without further ado, let's start this 'safar' (I have tried to arrange the problems in order of difficulty):-
PROBLEM-1 (APMO 2012 Problem 4)
Let
be an acute triangle. Denote by
the foot of the perpendicular line drawn from the point
to the side
, by
the midpoint of
, and by
the orthocenter of
. Let
be the point of intersection of the circumcircle
of the triangle
and the half line
, and
be the point of intersection (other than
) of the line
and the circle
. Prove that
must hold.
Solution: By Property 1, we know that
is the
-Queue point of
(rename it as
from now on). Seeing this point, we add in the
-Ex point
. Also note that we are supposed to show that
is harmonic, for which we will require some sort of perspectivity. As all points are closely linked to the point
, so it is our first and foremost choice for perspector. Using the fact that
is harmonic (I guess this has been given in the proof of Property-3), and with the help of Property-1, we get that 
REMARK: Remember this problem as a property itself. Another similar problem is Brazil MO 2011 Problem 5. The details of the proof are left to the reader as an exercise (If someone wants, they can post their proof in the comments section later).
PROBLEM-2 (Vietnam MO 2019 Problem 6)
Given an acute triangle
and
be its circumcircle, and
is its orthocenter. Let
be midpoints of
, respectively.
are the feet of the altitudes from
and
, respectively. Let
symmetry with
through
.
intersects
at
,
intersects
at
.
a)
intersects smaller arc
of
at
. Prove that
are concyclic.
b)
intersect
at
(
), respectively. Prove that
are concurent.
Solution: As there are too many points on a single circle (namely the nine-point circle), and the intersections of some lines formed by them is concerned, so we resort to Pascal. Trying to form the desired intersections, we apply Pascal to
, to find that
are in fact collinear. At first glance, the given conditions do not give any more significant information (atleast not to me
). So we look at what we are supposed to prove. As the point
must be fixed, we get interested in finding that point first. Suppose we assume that what we are supposed to prove is true (Remember this trick). Then by Radical Axes Theorem on
, we get that
passes through the
-Ex point
of
. Wow! That's interesting. But again we are stuck. At this point of time, I always try to incorporate the fact that
is harmonic. Taking perspectivity from
, we get that
So we arrive at the most crucial part of the solution. We just need to show that the line
is the
-symmedian, in which case the above harmonic bundles (and some use of Power of Point in place of Radical Axes Theorem) will do the job.
Now, the main question is how to show that
is the
-symmedian. Because of the weird definition of
, there's not much one can do apart from applying Pascal's Theorem again. Trying to find some nice hexagons involving
, we stumble upon
. This is nice, as we know that
, and so we get that
. Now, it is some manipulations before finding a way out. What I did was take notice of the fact that
lies on
, and so the reflection of
in
(say
) must lie on
. This is quite helpful, because we also know that
is antiparallel wrt
(as
). But,
bisects
, which directly gives that it must be the
-symmedian (this is quite well known I guess). Thus, we are done with Part (a).
For Part (b), we again use our friend this evening, Pascal (the motivation comes from the number of points involved on the circumcircle of
). This is easy, and with some trial and error, one easily gets the two desired hexagons
and
, after which one can finish using the fact that
are concurrent.
REMARK: This solution illustrates the power of Pascal. Most of the students are aware of it, but still its true nature is never used to the fullest. You can find my original solution here.
So let's move on to some TST problems (due to time constraint, I'll only be able to take up 3 problems; readers can include more problems in the comments section if they wish to
).
PROBLEM-3 (Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018 TST Day 1 Problem 1)
In acute triangle
let
,
and
be foots of perpedicular from
,
and
to
,
and
, respectively. Let
and
be points on line
such that
and
. Prove that 
Solution: Let
be the midpoint of
(we introduce to get a link to
). Then
is cyclic. Our solution is motivated by this well-known lemma and its converse (Lemma 9.17 in EGMO). Without knowing that lemma, it might be difficult to produce this proof (Basically I am just telling you to learn it ASAP
). According to this lemma, if
denotes the
-Ex point of
, then
(as
is harmonic). But,
, so we get
. Combining these two equalities, we see that
is cyclic. As
, so we get that in fact
bisects
externally. This is the crucial part of the solution. After this it is just some angle chasing (unfortunately there's not much motivation for that; you just try to find nice angles). The full proof can be found here.
REMARK: All the above solutions show how important the harmonic bundle
is. Always try to use this.
PROBLEM-4 (USA TSTST 2016 Problem 2)
Let
be a scalene triangle with orthocenter
and circumcenter
. Denote by
,
the midpoints of
,
. Suppose the circle
with diameter
meets the circumcircle of
at
, and meets line
at a point
. The tangent to
at
meets line
at
. Show that the circumcircles of
and
intersect at a point
on
.
Solution: Let's sort this information first (This is really important to all geo problems). By its definition,
is the
-Queue point, and
is the
-Humpty point. Also,
lies on
, which is nothing but the perpendicular bisector of
. So
, which means that
is also tangent to
. So, in quadrilateral
,
and
(all tangents taken wrt
). Applying Pascal on
and
, we get that
are collinear (this is true for all cyclic quadrilaterals; learn this result as a fact as it is quite useful). Now, these two new intersection points move us closer towards a complete quadrilateral. So let's "complete" this complete quadrilateral configuration (pun intended
). We add in the
-Ex point
. As discussed in Problem-3 of Part One, this should motivate us to look for Brokard's Theorem. Then using Brokard (and the collinearity discussed earlier), we get that
is the polar of
wrt
. So we have removed point
, and now it suffices to show that
lies on the polar of
.
Let's look at the two circles now. Using Properties-1,2 and 3, we know that
, which means that
. Suppose what we are supposed to prove is true, i.e.
is the polar of
wrt
. But,
(as
). So we get that
must in fact be the inverse of
wrt
. As the original direction is a bit difficult to prove, we will try to use phantom points. Let
be the inverse of
wrt
. As
, so
. Thus it suffices to show that
, which is equivalent to proving that
(since
are collinear). However,
is nothing but the power of
wrt
(as
is the inverse of
in
). Thus, 
REMARK: To be honest, this problem doesn't require any remarks
. A "complete" solution can be seen here.
PROBLEM-5 (2015 Taiwan TST Round 3 Quiz 1 Problem 2)
Let
be the circumcircle of the triangle
. Two circles
are tangent to each of the circle
and the rays
, with
interior to
,
exterior to
. The common tangent of
and the common tangent of
intersect at the point
. Let
be the midpoint of the arc
(not containing the point
) on the circle
, and the segment
be the diameter of
. Prove that
, and
are collinear.
Solution: This problem is one of my favourite problems, with a short, yet beautiful solution. Seeing the involvement of both the
-mixtilinear incircle and excircle, we perform
inversion, to get the following equivalent problem:-
We are supposed to show that
is cyclic; or equivalently that
. But, applying Property-3 to
(The only major difficulty in this problem), this is only possible if
is the
-Ex point of
. As
is also the foot of
-altitude of
, so it suffices to prove that
is harmonic (See the Remark given after Problem-3 above). Now, we again turn our attention back to
. Then one can easily finish as given in my solution here.
REMARK: After reading the solution above, one might be compelled to think that this problem is not that hard. However, according to me, the main difficulty one faces in this solution is to quickly turn one's attention from one triangle to another. This is really important, and so I'll again bring the reader's attention to this point. Basically, do not be constrained by the reference triangle given in the problem. Try exploring other triangles. Often hard problems are simply restatements of well known facts wrt some other triangle. Two triangles which easily interchange amongst themselves are the excentral triangle and the orthic triangle. I prefer working with the orthocenter configuration, but your preference might be something else. A nice example of this is USAMO 2017 P3.
With this, I come to an end to this section. Hopefully, you guys enjoyed this post (If that is so, feel free to comment). My next post will most probably come after IMOTC only now, so with that I bid adieu to all. Sayonara


PROBLEM-1 (APMO 2012 Problem 4)
Let

















Solution: By Property 1, we know that










REMARK: Remember this problem as a property itself. Another similar problem is Brazil MO 2011 Problem 5. The details of the proof are left to the reader as an exercise (If someone wants, they can post their proof in the comments section later).
PROBLEM-2 (Vietnam MO 2019 Problem 6)
Given an acute triangle

















a)





b)





Solution: As there are too many points on a single circle (namely the nine-point circle), and the intersections of some lines formed by them is concerned, so we resort to Pascal. Trying to form the desired intersections, we apply Pascal to














Now, the main question is how to show that



















For Part (b), we again use our friend this evening, Pascal (the motivation comes from the number of points involved on the circumcircle of




REMARK: This solution illustrates the power of Pascal. Most of the students are aware of it, but still its true nature is never used to the fullest. You can find my original solution here.
So let's move on to some TST problems (due to time constraint, I'll only be able to take up 3 problems; readers can include more problems in the comments section if they wish to

PROBLEM-3 (Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018 TST Day 1 Problem 1)
In acute triangle

















Solution: Let
















REMARK: All the above solutions show how important the harmonic bundle

PROBLEM-4 (USA TSTST 2016 Problem 2)
Let





















Solution: Let's sort this information first (This is really important to all geo problems). By its definition,


























Let's look at the two circles now. Using Properties-1,2 and 3, we know that

























REMARK: To be honest, this problem doesn't require any remarks

PROBLEM-5 (2015 Taiwan TST Round 3 Quiz 1 Problem 2)
Let




















Solution: This problem is one of my favourite problems, with a short, yet beautiful solution. Seeing the involvement of both the


Inverted problem wrote:
Let
and
be the
-intouch and
-extouch point in
,
be the foot of internal angle bisector of
, and
be the foot of the
-altitude. Let
be the
-Humpty point of
. Show that
is cyclic.
























REMARK: After reading the solution above, one might be compelled to think that this problem is not that hard. However, according to me, the main difficulty one faces in this solution is to quickly turn one's attention from one triangle to another. This is really important, and so I'll again bring the reader's attention to this point. Basically, do not be constrained by the reference triangle given in the problem. Try exploring other triangles. Often hard problems are simply restatements of well known facts wrt some other triangle. Two triangles which easily interchange amongst themselves are the excentral triangle and the orthic triangle. I prefer working with the orthocenter configuration, but your preference might be something else. A nice example of this is USAMO 2017 P3.
With this, I come to an end to this section. Hopefully, you guys enjoyed this post (If that is so, feel free to comment). My next post will most probably come after IMOTC only now, so with that I bid adieu to all. Sayonara

This post has been edited 2 times. Last edited by math_pi_rate, Dec 4, 2019, 6:56 PM