8 Comments
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
by
dragon96, May 21, 2011, 6:01 AM
- Report
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
my version, not that people really care
Before I made usamo I thought everything was talent and there was no such thing as hard work. Seeing people struggle in school reaffirmed my idea.
After I made usamo I thought it wasn't just talent, but work as well. However I thought that the only way to have motivation to work hard was to see progress and have previous successes to back your confidence up.
After I bombed the aime and didn't make usamo, I realized it wasn't talent, but rather starting early, experience, background (all of which can be categorized as "work" in some way).
Now that I've bombed the aime a 3rd time, I realized if you can let go of the small things and look at the big picture and if you have genuine interest, you can work hard and succeed, even if you lack background and confidence from previous success.
Before I made usamo I thought everything was talent and there was no such thing as hard work. Seeing people struggle in school reaffirmed my idea.
After I made usamo I thought it wasn't just talent, but work as well. However I thought that the only way to have motivation to work hard was to see progress and have previous successes to back your confidence up.
After I bombed the aime and didn't make usamo, I realized it wasn't talent, but rather starting early, experience, background (all of which can be categorized as "work" in some way).
Now that I've bombed the aime a 3rd time, I realized if you can let go of the small things and look at the big picture and if you have genuine interest, you can work hard and succeed, even if you lack background and confidence from previous success.
This post has been edited 4 times. Last edited by serialk11r, May 21, 2011, 7:26 PM
by
serialk11r, May 21, 2011, 7:22 PM
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Luck.
Okay more seriously, here's my personal theory...
The answer depends on what kind of levels you're trying to differentiate.
If we're comparing the average or under-average people at school to stronger students, the biggest two things are going to be a) talent and b) quality of instruction. The latter stems partly from curiosity: if you manage to find the world of contest math and learn how to solve problems rather than school formula memming, that's awesome. The more talent you have, the more you're likely to step into Mathcounts or AMC's and the like, which in turn makes your talent usable.
On the other hand, if you just follow the curriculum, you're basically screwed over. You get locked into this attitude of "math is stupid" and this is essentially irreversible. This is why curiosity is important- it lets you step away from school.
If we're comparing a Red MOPper and a Green MOPper, then a very large portion of that difference is going to come from hard work/starting early/experience and whatever. On the other hand talent is a large part in the very very best... for example there's no chance of me being able to compete with Reid Barton at any realistic level no matter how much training I get.
(Also I suspect, specific to the US, that MOP training would play a large role in strengthening the top. Don't have a basis for this, just a gut feeling.)
Okay more seriously, here's my personal theory...
The answer depends on what kind of levels you're trying to differentiate.
If we're comparing the average or under-average people at school to stronger students, the biggest two things are going to be a) talent and b) quality of instruction. The latter stems partly from curiosity: if you manage to find the world of contest math and learn how to solve problems rather than school formula memming, that's awesome. The more talent you have, the more you're likely to step into Mathcounts or AMC's and the like, which in turn makes your talent usable.
On the other hand, if you just follow the curriculum, you're basically screwed over. You get locked into this attitude of "math is stupid" and this is essentially irreversible. This is why curiosity is important- it lets you step away from school.
If we're comparing a Red MOPper and a Green MOPper, then a very large portion of that difference is going to come from hard work/starting early/experience and whatever. On the other hand talent is a large part in the very very best... for example there's no chance of me being able to compete with Reid Barton at any realistic level no matter how much training I get.
(Also I suspect, specific to the US, that MOP training would play a large role in strengthening the top. Don't have a basis for this, just a gut feeling.)
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
The post below has been deleted. Click to close.
This post has been deleted. Click here to see post.
Archives





























Shouts
Submit
248 shouts
Tags
About Owner
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: May 21, 2007
Blog Stats
- Blog created: Sep 5, 2007
- Total entries: 214
- Total visits: 371405
- Total comments: 440
Search Blog