Proof of the fact that one of it's angle is
.
Denote the incircle by

Let

be the reflection of

upon

Note that

since

Also,

lies on the isogonal of of the line

which means

Therefore,

is one of the intersections of

and

(i.e.
).
Case 1.
In this case we are almost done because
Case 2. 
but
Let

be the relfection of

upon

Let

be the second intersection of the altitude with

be the second intersection of

Since in this case

Hence

because

must lie on

But

by assumption of this case. Which is absurd because

intersects

Hence this case is not possible.
And we are done.
Proof of uniqueness.
Assume the contrary that there are two such triangles. Without loss of generality assume they are with the same circumcircle. We know by the above proof that one of it's angles is

so they have a side of equal length. Place the equal sides as chords of the circle such that they coincide, let the chord be

Note that,
![\[\angle AIB=\angle 90^{\circ}+\frac{60^{\circ}}{2}=120^{\circ}=\angle AOB\]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/0/b/0/0b0cf8b2055883b2c2c664182c0d684296f9c456.png)
Hence

lies on circle

So as we move

along the arc

traces along the arc

of

Drop a perpendicular from

to side
, clearly the length of this perpendicular is
(inradius). By Euler's Formula, we have
![\[R^2-2Rr=r^2\implies r=\mbox{ fixed quantity in terms of R} (1)\]](//latex.artofproblemsolving.com/4/b/8/4b8a075dab2bf8bb03160a83d0c6207e19158584.png)
Since we fixed the circumradius of both the triangles, hence

is some fixed quantity. Now as we vary

along the arc

of

moves along

of

It is now easy to see that

attains it's fixed value determined by

twice(it is more easier if we drop a perp from

to
), Precisely, one of the triangles is the relfection of the other along the perpendicular bisector of

Which are considered the same, and we reach a contradiction to our assumption. And we are done.
