Difference between revisions of "User superagh olympiad notes"

(Created page with "Introduction SINCE MY COMPUTER WON'T LOAD THIS FOR SOME REASON, I'LL BE UPDATING THIS AS I GO THOUGH :) Ok, so inspired by master math solver Lcz, I have decided to take Oly...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Introduction
+
==Introduction==
 
SINCE MY COMPUTER WON'T LOAD THIS FOR SOME REASON, I'LL BE UPDATING THIS AS I GO THOUGH :)
 
SINCE MY COMPUTER WON'T LOAD THIS FOR SOME REASON, I'LL BE UPDATING THIS AS I GO THOUGH :)
  
 
Ok, so inspired by master math solver Lcz, I have decided to take Oly notes (for me) online! I'll probably be yelled at even more for staring at the computer, but I know that this is for my good. (Also this thing is almost the exact same format as Lcz's :P ). (Ok, actually, a LOT of credits to Lcz)
 
Ok, so inspired by master math solver Lcz, I have decided to take Oly notes (for me) online! I'll probably be yelled at even more for staring at the computer, but I know that this is for my good. (Also this thing is almost the exact same format as Lcz's :P ). (Ok, actually, a LOT of credits to Lcz)
  
Algebra
+
==Algebra==
 
Problems worth noting/reviewing
 
Problems worth noting/reviewing
 
I'll leave this empty for now, I want to start on HARD stuff yeah!
 
I'll leave this empty for now, I want to start on HARD stuff yeah!
  
Inequalities
+
===Inequalities===
 
We shall begin with INEQUALITIES! They should be fun enough. I should probably begin with some theorems.
 
We shall begin with INEQUALITIES! They should be fun enough. I should probably begin with some theorems.
  
Power mean (special case)
+
====Power mean (special case)====
 
Statement: Given that <math>a_1, a_2, a_3, ... a_n > 0</math>, <math>a_{i} \in \mathbb{R}</math> where <math>1 \le i \le n</math>. Define the <math>pm_x(a_1, a_2, \cdots , a_n)</math> as:<cmath>(\frac{a_1^x+a_2^x+\cdots+a_n^x}{n})^{\frac{1}{x}},</cmath>where <math>x\neq0</math>, and:<cmath>\sqrt[n]{a_{1}a_{2}a_{3} \cdots a_{n}}.</cmath>where <math>x=0</math>.
 
Statement: Given that <math>a_1, a_2, a_3, ... a_n > 0</math>, <math>a_{i} \in \mathbb{R}</math> where <math>1 \le i \le n</math>. Define the <math>pm_x(a_1, a_2, \cdots , a_n)</math> as:<cmath>(\frac{a_1^x+a_2^x+\cdots+a_n^x}{n})^{\frac{1}{x}},</cmath>where <math>x\neq0</math>, and:<cmath>\sqrt[n]{a_{1}a_{2}a_{3} \cdots a_{n}}.</cmath>where <math>x=0</math>.
  
Line 28: Line 28:
 
If <math>r>s</math>, then <math>P(r) \geq P(s)</math>. Equality occurs if and only if all the <math>a_i</math> are equal.
 
If <math>r>s</math>, then <math>P(r) \geq P(s)</math>. Equality occurs if and only if all the <math>a_i</math> are equal.
  
Cauchy-Swartz Inequality
+
====Cauchy-Swartz Inequality====
 
Let there be two sets of integers, <math>a_1, a_2, \cdots a_n</math> and <math>b_1, b_2, \cdots b_n</math>, such that <math>n</math> is a positive integer, where all members of the sequences are real, then we have:<cmath>(a_1^2+a_2^2+\cdots +a_n^2)(b_1^2+b_2^2+ \cdots +b_n^2)\ge (a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + \cdots +a_nb_n)^2.</cmath>Equality holds if for all <math>a_i</math>, where <math>1\le i \le n</math>, <math>a_i=0</math>, or for all <math>b_i</math>, where <math>1\le i \le n</math>, <math>b_i=0</math>., or we have some constant <math>k</math> such that <math>b_i=ka_i</math> for all <math>i</math>.
 
Let there be two sets of integers, <math>a_1, a_2, \cdots a_n</math> and <math>b_1, b_2, \cdots b_n</math>, such that <math>n</math> is a positive integer, where all members of the sequences are real, then we have:<cmath>(a_1^2+a_2^2+\cdots +a_n^2)(b_1^2+b_2^2+ \cdots +b_n^2)\ge (a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + \cdots +a_nb_n)^2.</cmath>Equality holds if for all <math>a_i</math>, where <math>1\le i \le n</math>, <math>a_i=0</math>, or for all <math>b_i</math>, where <math>1\le i \le n</math>, <math>b_i=0</math>., or we have some constant <math>k</math> such that <math>b_i=ka_i</math> for all <math>i</math>.
  
Bernoulli's Inequality
+
====Bernoulli's Inequality====
 
Given that <math>n</math>, <math>x</math> are real numbers such that <math>n\ge 0</math> and <math>x \ge -1</math>, we have:<cmath>(1+x)^n \ge 1+nx.</cmath>
 
Given that <math>n</math>, <math>x</math> are real numbers such that <math>n\ge 0</math> and <math>x \ge -1</math>, we have:<cmath>(1+x)^n \ge 1+nx.</cmath>
 
Rearrangement Inequality
 
Rearrangement Inequality
 
Given that<cmath>x_1 \ge x_2 \ge x_3 \cdots x_n</cmath>and<cmath>y_1 \ge y_2 \ge y_3 \cdots y_n.</cmath>We have:<cmath>x_1y_1+x_2y_2 + \cdots + x_ny_n</cmath>is greater than any other pairings' sum.
 
Given that<cmath>x_1 \ge x_2 \ge x_3 \cdots x_n</cmath>and<cmath>y_1 \ge y_2 \ge y_3 \cdots y_n.</cmath>We have:<cmath>x_1y_1+x_2y_2 + \cdots + x_ny_n</cmath>is greater than any other pairings' sum.
  
Holder's Inequality
+
====Holder's Inequality====
 
If <math>a_1, a_2, \cdots, a_n</math>, <math>b_1, b_2, \cdots, b_n</math>, <math>\cdots</math>, <math>z_1, z_2, \cdots, z_n</math> are nonnegative real numbers and <math>\lambda_a, \lambda_b, \cdots, \lambda_z</math> are nonnegative reals with sum of <math>1</math>, then:<cmath>a_1^{\lambda_a}b_1^{\lambda_b} \cdots z_1^{\lambda_z} + \cdots + a_n^{\lambda_a} b_n^{\lambda_b} \cdots z_n^{\lambda_z} \le (a_1 + \cdots + a_n)^{\lambda_a} (b_1 + \cdots + b_n)^{\lambda_b} \cdots (z_1 + \cdots + z_n)^{\lambda_z} .</cmath>This is a generalization of the Cauchy Swartz Inequality.
 
If <math>a_1, a_2, \cdots, a_n</math>, <math>b_1, b_2, \cdots, b_n</math>, <math>\cdots</math>, <math>z_1, z_2, \cdots, z_n</math> are nonnegative real numbers and <math>\lambda_a, \lambda_b, \cdots, \lambda_z</math> are nonnegative reals with sum of <math>1</math>, then:<cmath>a_1^{\lambda_a}b_1^{\lambda_b} \cdots z_1^{\lambda_z} + \cdots + a_n^{\lambda_a} b_n^{\lambda_b} \cdots z_n^{\lambda_z} \le (a_1 + \cdots + a_n)^{\lambda_a} (b_1 + \cdots + b_n)^{\lambda_b} \cdots (z_1 + \cdots + z_n)^{\lambda_z} .</cmath>This is a generalization of the Cauchy Swartz Inequality.
  
Combinatorics
+
==Combinatorics==
Number Theory
+
==Number Theory==
Geometry
+
==Geometry==

Revision as of 19:12, 24 June 2020

Introduction

SINCE MY COMPUTER WON'T LOAD THIS FOR SOME REASON, I'LL BE UPDATING THIS AS I GO THOUGH :)

Ok, so inspired by master math solver Lcz, I have decided to take Oly notes (for me) online! I'll probably be yelled at even more for staring at the computer, but I know that this is for my good. (Also this thing is almost the exact same format as Lcz's :P ). (Ok, actually, a LOT of credits to Lcz)

Algebra

Problems worth noting/reviewing I'll leave this empty for now, I want to start on HARD stuff yeah!

Inequalities

We shall begin with INEQUALITIES! They should be fun enough. I should probably begin with some theorems.

Power mean (special case)

Statement: Given that $a_1, a_2, a_3, ... a_n > 0$, $a_{i} \in \mathbb{R}$ where $1 \le i \le n$. Define the $pm_x(a_1, a_2, \cdots , a_n)$ as:\[(\frac{a_1^x+a_2^x+\cdots+a_n^x}{n})^{\frac{1}{x}},\]where $x\neq0$, and:\[\sqrt[n]{a_{1}a_{2}a_{3} \cdots a_{n}}.\]where $x=0$.

If $x \ge y$, then\[pm_x(a_1, a_2, \cdots , a_n) \ge pm_y(a_1, a_2, \cdots , a_n).\] Power mean (weighted) Statement: Let $a_1, a_2, a_3, . . . a_n$ be positive real numbers. Let $w_1, w_2, w_3, . . . w_n$ be positive real numbers ("weights") such that $w_1+w_2+w_3+ . . . w_n=1$. For any $r \in \mathbb{R}$,

if $r=0$,

\[P(r)=a_1^{w_1} a_2^{w_2} a_3^{w_3} . . . a_n^{w_n}\].

if $r \neq 0$,

\[P(r)=(w_1a_1^r+w_2a_2^r+w_3a_3^r . . . +w_na_n^r)^{\frac{1}{r}}\].

If $r>s$, then $P(r) \geq P(s)$. Equality occurs if and only if all the $a_i$ are equal.

Cauchy-Swartz Inequality

Let there be two sets of integers, $a_1, a_2, \cdots a_n$ and $b_1, b_2, \cdots b_n$, such that $n$ is a positive integer, where all members of the sequences are real, then we have:\[(a_1^2+a_2^2+\cdots +a_n^2)(b_1^2+b_2^2+ \cdots +b_n^2)\ge (a_1b_1 + a_2b_2 + \cdots +a_nb_n)^2.\]Equality holds if for all $a_i$, where $1\le i \le n$, $a_i=0$, or for all $b_i$, where $1\le i \le n$, $b_i=0$., or we have some constant $k$ such that $b_i=ka_i$ for all $i$.

Bernoulli's Inequality

Given that $n$, $x$ are real numbers such that $n\ge 0$ and $x \ge -1$, we have:\[(1+x)^n \ge 1+nx.\] Rearrangement Inequality Given that\[x_1 \ge x_2 \ge x_3 \cdots x_n\]and\[y_1 \ge y_2 \ge y_3 \cdots y_n.\]We have:\[x_1y_1+x_2y_2 + \cdots + x_ny_n\]is greater than any other pairings' sum.

Holder's Inequality

If $a_1, a_2, \cdots, a_n$, $b_1, b_2, \cdots, b_n$, $\cdots$, $z_1, z_2, \cdots, z_n$ are nonnegative real numbers and $\lambda_a, \lambda_b, \cdots, \lambda_z$ are nonnegative reals with sum of $1$, then:\[a_1^{\lambda_a}b_1^{\lambda_b} \cdots z_1^{\lambda_z} + \cdots + a_n^{\lambda_a} b_n^{\lambda_b} \cdots z_n^{\lambda_z} \le (a_1 + \cdots + a_n)^{\lambda_a} (b_1 + \cdots + b_n)^{\lambda_b} \cdots (z_1 + \cdots + z_n)^{\lambda_z} .\]This is a generalization of the Cauchy Swartz Inequality.

Combinatorics

Number Theory

Geometry