Difference between revisions of "1974 IMO Problems/Problem 3"
Durianaops (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==Problem== Prove that the number <math>\sum^n_{k=0}\binom{2n+1}{2k+1}2^{3k}</math> is not divisible by <math>5</math> for any integer <math>n\ge0.</math> ==Solution== {{solu...") |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
− | {{solution}} | + | Everything that follows takes place in <math>\mathbb F_5(\sqrt 2)</math>, i.e. the field we get by adjoining a root of <math>x^2-2=0</math> to <math>\mathbb F_5</math>, the field with <math>5</math> elements. |
+ | |||
+ | We have <math>\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{2n+1}{2k+1}2^{3k}=\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{2n+1}{2n-2k}3^k=\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{2n+1}{2(n-k)}2^{-k}</math>. Now, this is zero iff it's zero when we multiply it by <math>2^n</math>, so we may as well prove that <math>\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{2n+1}{2(n-k)}\sqrt 2^{2(n-k)}\ne 0</math>. The LHS is <math>\alpha</math> from <math>(1+\sqrt 2)^{2n+1}=\alpha+\beta\sqrt 2,\ \alpha,\beta\in\mathbb F_5</math>. We have <math>(1-\sqrt 2)^{2n+1}=\alpha-\beta\sqrt 2</math>, so by multiplying them we get <math>-1=\alpha^2-2\beta^2</math>. If we were to have <math>\alpha=0</math>, then we would get <math>1=2\beta^2,\ \beta\in\mathbb F_5</math>, and this is impossible, since it would make <math>3=2^{-1}</math> a square <math>\beta^2</math> in <math>\mathbb F_5</math> (i.e. <math>3</math> would be a quadratic residue modulo <math>5</math>, and it's not). | ||
+ | |||
+ | The above solution was posted and copyrighted by grobber. The original thread for this problem can be found here: [https://aops.com/community/p359102] | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== |
Revision as of 14:58, 29 January 2021
Problem
Prove that the number is not divisible by for any integer
Solution
Everything that follows takes place in , i.e. the field we get by adjoining a root of to , the field with elements.
We have . Now, this is zero iff it's zero when we multiply it by , so we may as well prove that . The LHS is from . We have , so by multiplying them we get . If we were to have , then we would get , and this is impossible, since it would make a square in (i.e. would be a quadratic residue modulo , and it's not).
The above solution was posted and copyrighted by grobber. The original thread for this problem can be found here: [1]
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1974 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 4 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |