Difference between revisions of "2022 AMC 12B Problems/Problem 22"

(Remark)
(Redirected page to 2022 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 23)
(Tag: New redirect)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Problem==
+
#redirect [[2022 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 23]]
Ant Amelia starts on the number line at <math>0</math> and crawls in the following manner. For <math>n=1,2,3,</math> Amelia chooses a time duration <math>t_n</math> and an increment <math>x_n</math> independently and uniformly at random from the interval <math>(0,1).</math> During the <math>n</math>th step of the process, Amelia moves <math>x_n</math> units in the positive direction, using up <math>t_n</math> minutes. If the total elapsed time has exceeded <math>1</math> minute during the <math>n</math>th step, she stops at the end of that step; otherwise, she continues with the next step, taking at most <math>3</math> steps in all. What is the probability that Amelia’s position when she stops will be greater than <math>1</math>?
 
 
 
<math>\textbf{(A) }\frac{1}{3} \qquad \textbf{(B) }\frac{1}{2} \qquad \textbf{(C) }\frac{2}{3} \qquad \textbf{(D) }\frac{3}{4} \qquad \textbf{(E) }\frac{5}{6}</math>
 
 
 
==Solution 1==
 
 
 
We use the following lemma to solve this problem.
 
 
 
---------------------------------------
 
Let <math>y_1, y_2, \cdots, y_n</math> be independent random variables that are uniformly distributed on <math>(0,1)</math>. Then for <math>n = 2</math>,
 
<cmath>
 
\[
 
\Bbb P \left( y_1 + y_2 \leq 1 \right) = \frac{1}{2} .
 
\]
 
</cmath>
 
 
 
For <math>n = 3</math>,
 
<cmath>
 
\[
 
\Bbb P \left( y_1 + y_2 + y_3 \leq 1 \right) = \frac{1}{6} . \textrm{ (Check remark for proof)}
 
\]
 
</cmath>
 
---------------------------------------
 
 
 
Now, we solve this problem.
 
 
 
We denote by <math>\tau</math> the last step Amelia moves. Thus, <math>\tau \in \left\{ 2, 3 \right\}</math>.
 
We have
 
 
 
<cmath>
 
\begin{align*}
 
P \left( \sum_{n=1}^\tau x_n > 1 \right)
 
& = P \left( x_1 + x_2 > 1 | t_1 + t_2 > 1 \right)
 
P \left( t_1 + t_2 > 1 \right) \\
 
& \hspace{1cm} + P \left( x_1 + x_2 + x_3 > 1 | t_1 + t_2 \leq 1 \right)
 
P \left( t_1 + t_2 \leq 1 \right) \\
 
& = P \left( x_1 + x_2 > 1 \right)
 
P \left( t_1 + t_2 > 1 \right)
 
+ P \left( x_1 + x_2 + x_3 > 1 \right)
 
P \left( t_1 + t_2 \leq 1 \right) \\
 
& = \left( 1 - \frac{1}{2} \right)\left( 1 - \frac{1}{2} \right)
 
+ \left( 1 - \frac{1}{6} \right) \frac{1}{2} \\
 
& = \boxed{\textbf{(C) } \frac{2}{3}} ,
 
\end{align*}
 
</cmath>
 
 
 
where the second equation follows from the property that <math>\left\{ x_n \right\}</math> and <math>\left\{ t_n \right\}</math> are independent sequences, the third equality follows from the lemma above.
 
 
 
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)
 
 
 
==Solution 2 (Clever)==
 
There are two cases: Amelia takes two steps or three steps.
 
 
 
The former case has a probability of <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>, as stated above, and thus the latter also has a probability of <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>.
 
 
 
The probability that Amelia passes <math>1</math> after two steps is also <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>, as it is symmetric to the probability above.
 
 
 
Thus, if the probability that Amelia passes <math>1</math> after three steps is <math>x</math>, our total probability is <math>\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot x</math>. We know that <math>0 < x < 1</math>, and it is relatively obvious that <math>x > \frac{1}{2}</math> (because the probability that <math>x > \frac{3}{2}</math> is <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>). This means that our total probability is between <math>\frac{1}{2}</math> and <math>\frac{3}{4}</math>, non-inclusive, so the only answer choice that fits is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(C) }\frac{2}{3}}</math>
 
 
 
~mathboy100
 
 
 
==Solution 3==
 
Obviously the chance of Amelia stopping after only <math>1</math> step is <math>0</math>.
 
 
 
When Amelia takes <math>2</math> steps, then the sum of the time taken during the steps is greater than <math>1</math> minute. Let the time taken be <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> respectively, then we need <math>x+y>1</math> for <math>0<x<1, 0<y<1</math>, which has a chance of <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>. Let the lengths of steps be <math>a</math> and <math>b</math> respectively, then we need <math>a+b>1</math> for <math>0<a<1, 0<b<1</math>, which has a chance of <math>\frac{1}{2}</math>. Thus the total chance for this case is <math>\frac{1}{4}</math>.
 
 
 
When Amelia takes <math>3</math> steps, then by complementary counting the chance of taking <math>3</math> steps is <math>1-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}</math>. Let the lengths of steps be <math>a</math>, <math>b</math> and <math>c</math> respectively, then we need <math>a+b+c>1</math> for <math>0<a<1, 0<b<1, 0<c<1</math>, which has a chance of <math>\frac{5}{6}</math> (Check the <b>Remark</b> section for proof.). Thus the total chance for this case is <math>\frac{5}{12}</math>.
 
 
 
Thus the answer is <math>\frac{1}{4}+\frac{5}{12}=\frac{2}{3}</math>.
 
 
 
==Solution 4 (Generalization, Induction)==
 
 
 
We can in fact find the probability that any number of randomly distributed numbers on the interval <math>[0, 1]</math> sum to more than <math>1</math> using geometric probability, as shown in the video below.
 
 
 
If we graph the points that satisfy <math>x + y < 1</math>, <math>0 < x, y < 1</math>, we get the triangle with points <math>(0, 1)</math>, <math>(0, 0)</math>, and <math>(1, 0)</math>. If we graph the points that satisfy <math>x + y + z < 1</math>, <math>0 < x, y, z < 1</math>, we get the tetrahedron with points <math>(0, 1, 0)</math>, <math>(0, 0, 0)</math>, <math>0, 0, 1</math>, and <math>(1, 0, 0)</math>.
 
 
 
Of course, the probability of either of these cases happening is simply the area/volume of the points we graphed divided by the total area of the graph, which is always <math>1</math> (this would be much simpler than my calculus proof above).
 
 
 
Thus, we can now solve for the probability that the sum is less than one for <math>n</math> numbers using induction.
 
 
 
<math>\textbf{Claim:}</math> The probability that the sum is less than one is <math>\frac{1}{n!}</math>.
 
 
 
<math>\textbf{Base Case:}</math> For just <math>1</math> number, the probability is <math>1</math>.
 
 
 
<math>\textbf{Induction step:}</math> Suppose that the probability for <math>n</math> numbers is <math>\frac{1}{n!}</math>. We will prove that the probability for <math>n+1</math> numbers is <math>\frac{1}{(n+1)!}</math>. To prove this, we consider that the area of an <math>n+1</math>-dimensional tetrahedron is simply the area/volume of the base times the height divided by <math>n+1</math>.
 
 
 
Of course, the area of the base is <math>\frac{1}{n!}</math>, and the height is <math>1</math>, and thus, we obtain <math>\frac{1}{n! \cdot (n+1)} = \frac{1}{(n+1)!}</math> as our volume (this may be hard to visualize for higher dimensions). The induction step is complete.
 
 
 
The probability of the sum being less than <math>1</math> is <math>\frac{1}{n!}</math>, and the probability of the sum being more than <math>1</math> is <math>\frac{n!-1}{n!}</math>. This trivializes the problem. The answer is <cmath>\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{2! - 1}{2!} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{3! - 1}{3!} = \boxed{\textbf{(C) }\frac{2}{3}}.</cmath>
 
 
 
~mathboy100
 
 
 
== Video Solution by OmegaLearn Using Geometric Probability ==
 
https://youtu.be/-AqhcVX8mTw
 
 
 
~ pi_is_3.14
 
==Video Solution==
 
 
 
https://youtu.be/WsA94SmsF5o
 
 
 
~ThePuzzlr
 
 
 
https://youtu.be/qOxnx_c9kVo
 
 
 
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)
 
 
 
==See Also==
 
 
 
{{AMC12 box|year=2022|ab=B|num-b=21|num-a=23}}
 
{{AMC10 box|year=2022|ab=B|num-b=22|num-a=24}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}
 

Latest revision as of 11:58, 4 December 2022