Difference between revisions of "2015 USAMO Problems/Problem 5"
(→Solution) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Let <math>a, b, c, d, e</math> be distinct positive integers such that <math>a^4 + b^4 = c^4 + d^4 = e^5</math>. Show that <math>ac + bd</math> is a composite number. | Let <math>a, b, c, d, e</math> be distinct positive integers such that <math>a^4 + b^4 = c^4 + d^4 = e^5</math>. Show that <math>ac + bd</math> is a composite number. | ||
− | ===Solution=== | + | ===Solution 1=== |
Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works! | Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works! | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
~BealsConjecture | ~BealsConjecture | ||
− | === | + | ===Solution 2=== |
A more conventional approach, using proof by contradiction: | A more conventional approach, using proof by contradiction: | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Therefore, by contradiction, <math>ac+bd</math> is composite. | Therefore, by contradiction, <math>ac+bd</math> is composite. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Solution 3=== |
Latest revision as of 20:37, 11 February 2024
Contents
Problem
Let be distinct positive integers such that . Show that is a composite number.
Solution 1
Note: This solution is definitely not what the folks at MAA intended, but it works!
Look at the statement . This can be viewed as a special case of Beal's Conjecture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beal%27s_conjecture), stating that the equation has no solutions over positive integers for and . This special case was proven in 2009 by Michael Bennet, Jordan Ellenberg, and Nathan Ng, as . This case is obviously contained under that special case, so and must have a common factor greater than .
Call the greatest common factor of and . Then for some and likewise for some . Then consider the quantity .
.
Because and are both positive, , and by definition , so is composite.
~BealsConjecture
Solution 2
A more conventional approach, using proof by contradiction:
Without loss of generality, assume
Since , It is obvious that
We construct the equation (the right side is the factorization of the left) Which factors into: (by using and factoring)
If or equal zero, then equals or respectively, which is impossible because and because are distinct. Therefore the right side of the equation above is non-zero and the left side must be divisible by
If were prime,
We have
Which means that and neither nor can be multiples of meaning must be a multiple of and for some integer
But clearly this is impossible since .
Therefore, by contradiction, is composite.