Difference between revisions of "1971 IMO Problems/Problem 4"
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Remarks (added by pf02, December 2024)== | ==Remarks (added by pf02, December 2024)== | ||
− | <math>\mathbf{Remark 1.}</math> The problem is incorrect. More precisely, | + | <math>\mathbf{Remark\ 1.}</math> The problem is incorrect. More precisely, |
question (a) is correct, but both statements of question (b) are | question (a) is correct, but both statements of question (b) are | ||
incorrect. The equality | incorrect. The equality | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
We will give a counterexample to the problem, making it clear that | We will give a counterexample to the problem, making it clear that | ||
− | + | (b) is wrong. Below, we will give a solution which proves statement | |
− | (a), and which answers the following questions | + | (a), and which answers the following questions: |
(b.1) Give conditions in terms of angles and sides of the tetrahedron | (b.1) Give conditions in terms of angles and sides of the tetrahedron | ||
− | when | + | when shortest polygonal paths exist, and show that in this case |
+ | infinitely may such paths exist. | ||
− | (b.2 | + | (b.2) Give a formula (in terms of angles and sides of the tetrahedron) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
for the length of the shortest polygonal path, when it exists. | for the length of the shortest polygonal path, when it exists. | ||
− | <math>\mathbf{Remark 2.}</math> The "solution" above is incorrect. The first part | + | <math>\mathbf{Remark\ 2.}</math> The "solution" above is incorrect. The first part |
(which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best, | (which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best, | ||
since it is not clear how it leads to the result. Very likely it is | since it is not clear how it leads to the result. Very likely it is | ||
Line 52: | Line 48: | ||
sense. | sense. | ||
− | <math>\mathbf{Remark 3.}</math> Below I will give the basic idea | + | <math>\mathbf{Remark\ 3.}</math> Below I will give the basic idea for solutions |
− | + | to this problem, and a counterexample to part (b) of the problem. | |
− | <math>\mathbf{Remark 4.}</math> Then, I will give a correct solution, proving part | + | <math>\mathbf{Remark\ 4.}</math> Then, I will give a correct solution, proving part |
− | (a) and the modified parts (b.1) | + | (a) and the modified parts (b.1) and (b.2) of the problem. During the |
proof, I will take a break to highlight the likely error made by the | proof, I will take a break to highlight the likely error made by the | ||
author of the problem. | author of the problem. |
Revision as of 16:05, 27 December 2024
Contents
Problem
All the faces of tetrahedron are acute-angled triangles. We consider all closed polygonal paths of the form defined as follows: is a point on edge distinct from and ; similarly, are interior points of edges , respectively. Prove:
(a) If , then among the polygonal paths, there is none of minimal length.
(b) If , then there are infinitely many shortest polygonal paths, their common length being , where .
Solution
Rotate the triangle around the edge until are in one plane. It is clear that in a shortest path, the point Y lies on the line connecting and . Therefore, . Summing the four equations like this, we get exactly .
Now, draw all four faces in the plane, so that is constructed on the exterior of the edge of and so on with edges and .
The final new edge (or rather ) is parallel to the original one (because of the angle equation). Call the direction on towards "right" and towards "left". If we choose a vertex on and connect it to the corresponding vertex on A'B'. This works for a whole interval of vertices if lies to the left of and and lies to the right of . It is not hard to see that these conditions correspond to the fact that various angles are acute by assumption.
Finally, regard the sine in half the isosceles triangle which gives the result with the angles around instead of , but the role of the vertices is symmetric.
Remarks (added by pf02, December 2024)
The problem is incorrect. More precisely, question (a) is correct, but both statements of question (b) are incorrect. The equality does not imply that there are any shortest polygonal paths, and when such shortest polygonal paths exist, their common length (where ).
We will give a counterexample to the problem, making it clear that (b) is wrong. Below, we will give a solution which proves statement (a), and which answers the following questions:
(b.1) Give conditions in terms of angles and sides of the tetrahedron when shortest polygonal paths exist, and show that in this case infinitely may such paths exist.
(b.2) Give a formula (in terms of angles and sides of the tetrahedron) for the length of the shortest polygonal path, when it exists.
The "solution" above is incorrect. The first part (which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best, since it is not clear how it leads to the result. Very likely it is incorrect. The second part, which claims to prove part (b) of the problem is clearly incorrect, since it claims to prove something which is not true. But it is incomplete/incorrect even where it should make sense.
Below I will give the basic idea for solutions to this problem, and a counterexample to part (b) of the problem.
Then, I will give a correct solution, proving part (a) and the modified parts (b.1) and (b.2) of the problem. During the proof, I will take a break to highlight the likely error made by the author of the problem.
Basic idea of a solution, and counterexample
[TO BE CONTINUED. SAVING MID WAY SO I DON"T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.]
See Also
1971 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 5 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |