Difference between revisions of "1971 IMO Problems/Problem 4"

Line 20: Line 20:
 
==Remarks (added by pf02, December 2024)==
 
==Remarks (added by pf02, December 2024)==
  
<math>\mathbf{Remark\ 1.}</math> The problem is incorrect.  More precisely,
+
The solution above is incomplete and/or incorrect.  The first part
question (a) is correct, but both statements of question (b) are
 
incorrect.  The equality
 
<math>\angle DAB + \angle BCD = \angle CDA + \angle ABC</math> does not imply
 
that there are any shortest polygonal paths, and when such shortest
 
polygonal paths exist, their common length
 
<math>\neq 2AC \sin(\alpha / 2)</math> (where
 
<math>\alpha = \angle BAC + \angle CAD + \angle DAB</math>).
 
 
 
We will give a counterexample to the problem, making it clear that
 
(b) is wrong. Below, we will give a solution which proves statement
 
(a), and which answers the following questions:
 
 
 
(b.1) Give conditions in terms of angles and sides of the tetrahedron
 
when shortest polygonal paths exist, and show that in this case
 
infinitely may such paths exist.
 
 
 
(b.2) Give a formula (in terms of angles and sides of the tetrahedron)
 
for the length of the shortest polygonal path, when it exists.
 
 
 
<math>\mathbf{Remark\ 2.}</math> The "solution" above is incorrect.  The first part
 
 
(which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best,
 
(which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best,
 
since it is not clear how it leads to the result.  Very likely it is
 
since it is not clear how it leads to the result.  Very likely it is
 
incorrect.  The second part, which claims to prove part (b) of the
 
incorrect.  The second part, which claims to prove part (b) of the
problem is clearly incorrect, since it claims to prove something which
+
problem skips too many stepsSome of the arguments in the proof
is not trueBut it is incomplete/incorrect even where it should make
+
(e.g. the fact that <math>AB \parallel A'B'</math> are true but need proof.
sense.
+
I could make no sense of other arguments in the proof, so I can
 
+
not judge whether they are correct or not (I suspect not).
<math>\mathbf{Remark\ 3.}</math> Below I will give the basic idea for solutions
 
to this problem, and a counterexample to part (b) of the problem.
 
  
<math>\mathbf{Remark\ 4.}</math> Then, I will give a correct solution, proving part
+
I will give a solution along the same basic idea.
(a) and the modified parts (b.1) and (b.2) of the problem.  During the
 
proof, I will take a break to highlight the likely error made by the
 
author of the problem.
 
  
  
==Basic idea of a solution, and counterexample==
+
==Solution 2==
  
The basic idea in both the attempted solution above and in the solution
+
The basic idea is to "fold out" the tetrahedron into a polygon in
below is to "fold out" the tetrahedron into a polygon in the plane.
+
the plane. The path <math>XYZTX</math> becomes a collection of connected
The path <math>XYZTX</math> becomes a collection of connected segments with
+
segments <math>XY, YZ, ZT, TX'</math> with the unconnected ends <math>X, X'</math> on
ends on two line segments.
+
the two line segments <math>AB, A'B'</math>.
  
 
[[File:prob_1971_4_1.png|600px]]
 
[[File:prob_1971_4_1.png|600px]]
Line 74: Line 49:
 
confusion in the notation.
 
confusion in the notation.
  
The polygonal path <math>XYZTX</math> becomes <math>XYTZX'</math>.  It is clear that in order
+
The polygonal path <math>XYZTX</math> becomes <math>XYZTX'</math>.  It is clear that in order
to minimize <math>XYZTX</math>, we should make <math>XYTZX'</math> be a segment o a straight
+
to minimize <math>XYZTX</math>, we should make <math>XYZTX'</math> be a segment on a straight
 
line.  Furthermore, to minimize the segment <math>XX'</math>, we want to choose
 
line.  Furthermore, to minimize the segment <math>XX'</math>, we want to choose
<math>X \in AB</math> so that when we draw the line segment to its mirror image
+
<math>X \in AB</math> so that when we draw the line segment to its corresponding
<math>X' \in A'B'</math>, the length of <math>XX'</math> is as short as possible.
+
image <math>X' \in A'B'</math>, the length of <math>XX'</math> is as short as possible.
  
  

Revision as of 01:26, 28 December 2024

Problem

All the faces of tetrahedron $ABCD$ are acute-angled triangles. We consider all closed polygonal paths of the form $XYZTX$ defined as follows: $X$ is a point on edge $AB$ distinct from $A$ and $B$; similarly, $Y, Z, T$ are interior points of edges $BC, CD, DA$, respectively. Prove:

(a) If $\angle DAB + \angle BCD \neq \angle CDA + \angle ABC$, then among the polygonal paths, there is none of minimal length.

(b) If $\angle DAB + \angle BCD = \angle CDA + \angle ABC$, then there are infinitely many shortest polygonal paths, their common length being $2AC \sin(\alpha / 2)$, where $\alpha = \angle BAC + \angle CAD + \angle DAB$.


Solution

Rotate the triangle $BCD$ around the edge $BC$ until $ABCD$ are in one plane. It is clear that in a shortest path, the point Y lies on the line connecting $X$ and $Z$. Therefore, $XYB=ZYC$. Summing the four equations like this, we get exactly $\angle ABC+\angle ADC=\angle BCD+\angle BAD$.

Now, draw all four faces in the plane, so that $BCD$ is constructed on the exterior of the edge $BC$ of $ABC$ and so on with edges $CD$ and $AD$.

The final new edge $AB$ (or rather $A'B'$) is parallel to the original one (because of the angle equation). Call the direction on $AB$ towards $B$ "right" and towards $A$ "left". If we choose a vertex $X$ on $AB$ and connect it to the corresponding vertex $X'$ on A'B'. This works for a whole interval of vertices $X$ if $C$ lies to the left of $B$ and $D$ and $D$ lies to the right of $A$. It is not hard to see that these conditions correspond to the fact that various angles are acute by assumption.

Finally, regard the sine in half the isosceles triangle $ACA'$ which gives the result with the angles around $C$ instead of $A$, but the role of the vertices is symmetric.


Remarks (added by pf02, December 2024)

The solution above is incomplete and/or incorrect. The first part (which claims to prove part (a) of the problem) is incomplete at best, since it is not clear how it leads to the result. Very likely it is incorrect. The second part, which claims to prove part (b) of the problem skips too many steps. Some of the arguments in the proof (e.g. the fact that $AB \parallel A'B'$ are true but need proof. I could make no sense of other arguments in the proof, so I can not judge whether they are correct or not (I suspect not).

I will give a solution along the same basic idea.


Solution 2

The basic idea is to "fold out" the tetrahedron into a polygon in the plane. The path $XYZTX$ becomes a collection of connected segments $XY, YZ, ZT, TX'$ with the unconnected ends $X, X'$ on the two line segments $AB, A'B'$.

Prob 1971 4 1.png

Specifically, we rotate three faces around $BC$ so $\triangle BCD$ is in the same plane as $\triangle ABC$. Then we rotate two faces around $CD$ so that $\triangle CDA$ is in the same plane with the previous triangles. Finally, we rotate $\triangle ABD$ around $AD$, so that it is in the same plane with the other triangles. We denote $A', B', X'$ the new points corresponding to $A, B, X$, to avoid confusion in the notation.

The polygonal path $XYZTX$ becomes $XYZTX'$. It is clear that in order to minimize $XYZTX$, we should make $XYZTX'$ be a segment on a straight line. Furthermore, to minimize the segment $XX'$, we want to choose $X \in AB$ so that when we draw the line segment to its corresponding image $X' \in A'B'$, the length of $XX'$ is as short as possible.




[TO BE CONTINUED. SAVING MID WAY SO I DON"T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.]


See Also

1971 IMO (Problems) • Resources
Preceded by
Problem 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 Followed by
Problem 5
All IMO Problems and Solutions